Sentences with phrase «found variable load»

Not exact matches

Exploring the effects of training variables, Bryanton et al. (2012) and Cotter et al. (2013) found that peak knee extensor moments increased with increasing depth (albeit with the same absolute loads).

Exploring the effects of training variables, Kellis et al. (2005) found that joint angles differed between relative loads but did not identify how the individual hip, knee and ankle joints differed; however, List et al. (2013) found that increasing load caused peak ankle angle to become more acute, from no load to 25 % of bodyweight, to 50 % of bodyweight.

Exploring training variables, Aspe and Swinton (2014) reported that greater relative loads produced greater levels of muscle activity but Li et al. (2013) found that greater relative loads did not lead to greater increases in muscle activity.

Exploring the effects of training variables, Kellis et al. (2005) found that joint angles differed between relative loads but did not identify how the individual hip, knee and ankle joints differed; however, McKean et al. (2010) reported that peak hip angle was more acute with load compared to no load, while both List et al. (2013) and Gomes et al. (2015) reported that peak hip angle became less acute with heavier relative loads.

Assessing the effect of training variables, Pearson et al. (2009) explored the effect of different relatives loads between 10 % — 100 % and found that mean power output increased to a peak at 50 % of 1RM before reducing to its minimum at 100 % of 1RM.

Comparing the effect of training variables, Clark et al. (2008) found that peak force output increased with greater relative load between 55 % and 80 % of 1RM performed on a smith machine using the Plyobrake system.

Assessing the effect of training variables, Newton et al. (1997) found a main effect of load on average and peak velocity during the bench press throw exercise.

Comparing the effects of different training variables, Swinton et al. (2011a) found that ground reaction forces increased with increasing relative loads from 10 to 80 % of 1RM with both the straight bar and hexagonal bar deadlifts.

Comparing the effects of different training variables, Swinton et al. (2011a) explored the effects of relative load between 10 — 80 % of 1RM and found that power outputs increased to a peak at 30 % of 1RM for straight bar deadlifts and to a peak at 40 % of 1RM hexagonal bar deadlifts, before reducing to a minimum at 80 % of 1RM.

Comparing the effects of different training variables, Swinton et al. (2011a) found that there was no difference in peak knee joint angles when using relative loads ranging between 10 — 80 % of 1RM with the straight bar and hexagonal bar deadlifts.

You can usually find them in either set denominations or as variable - load cards where you can choose how much to put on them.

The issue was hard to found because it was not in the form load event but in class - level variables.