They found voucher students were 21 percent more likely to graduate high school, and declared the program was «one of the most effective urban dropout prevention programs yet witnessed.»
The Milwaukee study found increased high school degree and college persistence with voucher students, while the DC study
found voucher students had increased high school graduation.
(We don't know what the long - term effects of vouchers are, though a study of DC
found voucher students graduated at higher rates.)
Similarly, in Louisiana, research after the first and second years of the program
found voucher students performed worse than their public school counterparts, but after three years, performance was roughly similar across both groups.
The CTBA report ignores entirely previous research from the Brookings Institution, a random - assignment study — the gold standard of social science research — that
found voucher students in Milwaukee scored six Normal Curve Equivalent points higher than the control group in reading and 11 points higher in math.
Not exact matches
Funding a Private School Education
Find out how to fund your child's private school education, including education scholarships, financial aid option, school
vouchers, education tax credits and K - 12
student loans.
More than 700,000
students in more than 1,200 New York City schools — including large high schools in all five boroughs — would face higher class sizes, have fewer teachers and lose after - school academic and enrichment programs if President - elect Trump makes good on a campaign promise to pull billions of federal dollars away from public schools to pay for private
vouchers, a UFT analysis has
found.
A report released this month by the city's public advocate, Letitia James,
found that thousands of
students with disabilities who were given the
vouchers weren't receiving services to which they were entitled.
Americans» support for using public funds to pay for
students to attend private schools apparently was growing even before the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision upholding the Cleveland
voucher plan,
findings from this year's Phi Delta Kappa / Gallup poll on public attitudes about education suggest.
From James Coleman's early observational studies of high schools to the experimental
voucher evaluations of the past 15 years, researchers have routinely
found that similar
students do at least as well and, at times, better academically in private schools than in public schools.
While the impact of
vouchers on African American
students was large, the impact of a
voucher offer on the college enrollment rate of Hispanic
students was
found to be a statistically insignificant 2 percentage points.
The Wolf / Kisida / Rhinesmith survey
found that most private schools that opted not to accept
voucher students were very concerned about threats to their «independence, character, or identity.»
Previous research has
found that the negative impact of
student mobility was only a fraction of the negative impact of Louisiana's
voucher program.
Henry Levin likewise asserts that «the evaluators
found that receiving a
voucher resulted in no advantage in math or reading test scores for either [low achievers or
students from SINI schools].»
We followed
students who participated in a
voucher experiment in New York City in the 1990s, and
found that African - American
students who won a
voucher were more likely to go to college than those who were not offered the opportunity.
Paul E. Peterson speaks with Patrick Wolf of the University of Arkansas about his study
finding that
students in Milwaukee who received
vouchers to attend private schools were 2 - 5 percentage points less likely to be accused or convicted of crimes than comparable
students who attended public schools.
In fact, there have been seven scientifically valid random - assignment analyses of
voucher programs, and all seven
found either that all
voucher students perform significantly better than their nonvoucher contemporaries, or at least that most of them do (in some studies the results for black
students, the majority of participants, are positive, while the results for other
students fail to achieve statistical significance).
A study comparing the performance of
students using
vouchers to attend private school in Milwaukee with
students who attend public schools
found that
students in both groups are exhibiting similar levels of growth.
The debate has reignited with last month's release of the third year LSP reports, which
found no statistically significant difference between
voucher students and the control group.
Paul E. Peterson, a prominent
voucher researcher and a professor of government at Harvard University,
found last year that black
students using the
vouchers...
The Devil Is in the Details of the Latest Supposedly Negative Study of DC's Voucher Program (The Washington Examiner) Marty West's perspective on new
findings on
vouchers and
student performance in DC schools.
In Chile,
students are
found in four types of schools: elite schools that do not accept
vouchers and charge considerably more than the
voucher; for - profit
voucher schools; nonprofit (usually religious)
voucher schools; and municipal schools.
While her primary focus — and the focus of many media reports about her — has been on
vouchers, tax credits, and education savings accounts, organizations she has led or helped
found have also advanced other reform initiatives, such as accountability for
student learning and more - rigorous academic standards.
The Commission, chaired by Dr. Paul Hill of the University of Washington, carefully reviewed the research on the impact of school choice on
student achievement and included in its report the following statement: «The most rigorous school choice evaluations that used random assignment...
found that academic gains from
vouchers were largely limited to the African - American
students in their studies.»
The study
found that minority
students who received a school
voucher to attend private elementary schools in 1997 were, as of 2013, 10 percent more likely to enroll in college and 35 percent more likely than their peers in public school to obtain a bachelor's degree.
And contrary to the claim that
vouchers hurt public schools, the report
found that
students at Milwaukee public schools «are performing at somewhat higher levels as a result of competitive pressure from the school
voucher program.»
If these children differ from
students who won a
voucher but failed to use it in ways that are related to
student achievement, it could bias our
findings.
The 2013
voucher study
found that being offered a
voucher had the effect of increasing college enrollment for African American
students but not for other
students.
We
find that the offer of a
voucher increased college enrollment within three years of the
student's expected graduation from high school by 0.7 percentage points, an insignificant impact.
As NPR's Cory Turner reports, the study
finds that public school
students in Indiana who used a
voucher to switch to a private school tended to backslide academically after switching schools, but if the
students remained in the private school long enough, their performance improved.
Peterson and Matthew Chingos published a study in the Summer 2013 issue of Education Next, «The Impact of School
Vouchers on College Enrollment,» that found that African - American students benefited the most from receiving v
Vouchers on College Enrollment,» that
found that African - American
students benefited the most from receiving
vouchersvouchers.
«Nine [of the 10] studies
find that
vouchers improve
student outcomes, six that all
students benefit and three that some benefit and some are not affected,» he writes.
A recent study of Milwaukee's older and larger
voucher program
found that 94 % of
students who stayed in the program throughout high school graduated, versus just 75 % of
students in Milwaukee's traditional public schools.
The Institute of Education Sciences study headed up by Patrick Wolf
found students more likely to graduate from
voucher schools in Washington, D. C. Kevin Booker, Tim R. Sass, Brian Gill and Ron Zimmer
found the same for charter schools in Chicago and Florida.
We
find that
vouchers have a moderately large, positive effect on the achievement of African - American
students, but no discernible effect on the performance of
students of other ethnicities.
One study published in the Summer 2013 issue of Education Next
found that
vouchers significantly boosted college enrollment rates for African American
students.
Instead she claims that the similar Milwaukee
finding of higher educational attainment from
vouchers is questionable because «75 % of the
students who started in a
voucher school left before graduation.»
We
found that that college enrollments for low - income, African American
students who used a
voucher to go to private elementary school increased by24 percent.
Using an experimental design, the study
found no clear effects of using a
voucher to enroll in a private school on
students» test scores four years later.
For instance, a 2015 study of a privately funded
voucher program in New York City
found that being offered a
voucher to attend a private school increased college enrollment rates among black and Hispanic
students by 4.4 percentage points, a 10 percent gain relative to the control group, and also increased bachelor's degree completion rates among black and Hispanic
students by 2.4 percentage points, a 27 percent gain.
We
found that low - income
students who used a
voucher to enroll in a private school in ninth grade subsequently graduated from high school, enrolled in a four - year college, and persisted in college at rates that were 4 — 7 percentage points higher than statistically similar Milwaukee
students who started in public schools in ninth grade.
The study, «The Louisiana Scholarship Program,» by Anna J. Egalite and Jonathan N. Mills,
finds that the transfers resulting from the LSP
vouchers statewide «overwhelmingly improve integration in the public schools
students leave (the sending schools), bringing the racial composition of the schools closer to that of the broader communities in which they are located.»
A 2013 study
found that
students using
vouchers to attend private schools, 70 percent of whom were black, were 5 percent more likely to enroll in a four - year college after graduating than were a carefully matched sample of
students in Milwaukee public schools.
Yet the evaluation also
found that using a
voucher improved
students» chances of graduating by as much as 21 percentage points.
We
find Deb O'Shea, St. Pat's principal, who withstands criticism about her school's decision to accept
voucher students, arguing that it has changed the school for the better.
The main
findings were not affected when the study estimated different kinds of models and made the sample larger by including
students that became eligible for a
voucher in any year after the program initially started in 2007.
In Ohio, the
findings were positive: The introduction of
voucher competition modestly improved the outcomes of
students who remained in their public schools — in the range of one - eighth of the magnitude of the black - white test - score gap.
School choice researchers are
finding that
vouchers may impact
student test scores and later attainment outcomes in different ways.
Only one study, conducted by Jay Greene and Marcus Winters and focusing on the D.C.
voucher program,
found that
voucher competition had no effect on the test scores of non-participants, while no empirical study of acceptable rigor has
found that a U.S. private - school - choice program decreased the achievement of public school
students.
Our
findings also speak only to the achievement gains of
students using
vouchers to switch to a private school in grades 5 — 8.