Sentences with phrase «founded by atheists»

The town of Whig CA was founded by Atheists, but the towns population according to the.

In fact, communism, which by the way, was founded by atheists, hates religion.

Again, this country was not founded by atheists.

>> >» Our country was founded by atheists.

Second, don't believe that this country was founded by atheists.

Not exact matches

Wherever in the world you find christians, you also find atheists by the truckloads.

I've found that atheists and especially atheists here regurgitate arguments put forth by Dawkins and Hitchens et al. as much as any Christian quotes the Bible.

Atheist try to fight their guilt by either finding and maginifying mistakes that Chritsians make or by trying to make a case in heir minds that God is not real.

Another thing to remember... the US was intended to be a secular republic by the founding fathers, many of whom had religious convictions, and some of whom were deists or atheists.

I find it interesting that the apparent atheists who feel the need to make themselves feel better by criticizing the bible and Christianity with snide little comments would even waste their time reading a blog — about belief.

but it is exasperating to be told by the religious that atheists are perhaps lesser beings as god only favours those who reject what nature tells us is the truth, I find the god myths boring and in no way inspiring.

According to the work produced by David B. Barrett's religious statistics organisation (FYI, the man was a Christian no less) atheists number more than Jews, Sikh's, Shintos, Baha'is, Jains, combined, and if you want to consider all «non - religious / secular / agnostic / atheist» together, since the whole «non-religion» movement is kinda riddled with people who find conontations of words like «atheist» to be bad enough to not want to declare themselves atheist, you'll find the number of that non-religious group also amounts more than those religions plus buddhism, and taoism or even Confucianism.

As an atheist, I find myself increasingly embarrassed by the level of intolerance shown by other atheists.

Of course, one may find atheist in large groups, or find banners, t - shirts... As an atheist myself I am overwhelmed by religious doctrine which I prefer to be absent from.

Out of all the postings on this site today, I found «Derp's «post the most fascinating and informative, as well as deeply revealing.Even after boasting of what seems to be a practically perfect live by any measure, he informs us that he takes pleasure in mocking and ridiculing those of faith who are presumably his opposite; I can only wonder if, given all his supposed accomplishments, he is smart enough to realize how deeply revealing of his true character his remarks are.As a believer, I rarely engage in arguments with my atheist friends, and like to think I wouldn't lower myself to the level of juvenile name - calling and personal attacks against whatever my atheist friends hold dear.Most of the time we simply agree to disagree; when they hold forth with misinformation or ignorance on their assumed «knowledge «of my faith, I try to gently correct them; I certainly don't allow any disagreements we have to devolve into hateful insults and name - calling.

Also find it interesting how the atheist are coming by the hordes to the Belief Blog.

It is just like atheists to step over His seeds that get blown by the wind to find their way to fertile grounds.

The revelational rap against apologetic theology is that it either engages in a sellout to the «world» (the self - disclosure of God being so utterly relativized by human wisdom that Christians are unable to tell atheists anything that they don't already know), or it is an exercise in various intellectual imperialisms, such as: «We can prove the existence of God» or «If human culture really understood itself, it would find that it is striving toward that which we already have.»

A philosophy professor by background, he recently founded the New College of the Humanities with fellow British atheists Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker.

That is seriously offensive considering our country was founded by mostly atheists.

I'd submit that the SBNR, like the atheist, is defined first and foremost by their rejection of structured belief systems they find invalid.

I was brought here by the Florida Dove's Church man of God upon his threat to burn the Quran and what I found was that all here were cursing and few being moderate or defending and found that the majority who were cursing to be either atheists or similar while those defending were those of Heavenly faiths.

The country was not founded by a bunch of atheists.

Considering atheists are being effected by religion a lot more than the average person (whether self inflicted or not) it makes sense you'd find atheists commenters on religious artcles.

I have seen a lot of bad behavior from christians, (or those claiming to be) I was also incredibly surprised to find so many nonchristians, whether they be from varying religions, or agnostics and atheists, to have good behavior, and even exhibit «fruit of the spirit», what I once considered to be a way to test the faith, or rather character of a christian, (they will know them by their fruit).

The common trait I have found among most Atheists is a void of unhappiness expressed by witty sarcasm which they believe makes them appear right.

And the churches will find a way to separat the believers and by default give us atheists the upper hand as now we will face smaller groups lead by small voices instead of one group with one voice... the battle shall be epic!

Couldn't you also make the case that: If you listen to tesimonies shared rather than anti-atheist bigots, you'd find yourself surprised by how Christian active atheists really are...?

After 58 years wondering about all of this, I found an intriguing book «I Don't Have Enough Faith to be An Atheist» by Norman LGeisler and Frank Turek.

I find it ironic that the pioneering work done by Christian scientists are being held in high regard by the atheist scientists of today.

Atheists and agnostics are more driven by compassion to help others than are highly religious people, a new study finds.

What I find most interesting, as evidenced by many of the comments here, is that it brings out the contemptuous remarks and finger pointing of the true - believers and the purportedly objective atheists.

When the Founding Fathers talked about liberty, they never even imagined how idiotic and evil some Americans would be by becoming atheists and Sodomites.

You've met enough atheists on this board by now to know that atheists find the communists governments as repugnant as you do.

I'm an atheist, too, and I find displays of religion as a response to an attack motivated by religion somewhat ironic (though not quite as perverse as stepping over 2500 dead bodies to find a 90 - degree angle and then hoisting it up and saying «see, god is here!)

Also, I believe that if all Americans were given a vote to decapitate either «The Religious» «atheists» or «No one» you would find a majority of voting for «No one» with «atheists» being a close second bolstered by the Christian vote who really would not mind adding blasphemy laws and turning the US into a Christian Taliban.

I find it funny that atheists have much to say on the religious by pointing out the faults but lack the integrity to create a more ideal and truthful perspective of what is justice and the right way...

I find the comments by the atheist on all message boards disheartening.

As an Atheist I find the extreme approach taken by some other Atheists insulting.

These are the real Atheist people that I'm talking about who actually, seriously, study to find their quest of God's existence by studying science.

I agree, it should be called «the Atheist Blog» I DO find it very comforting that more and more people of reason are commenting on here every month, (because the anonymity of the internet allows us to do so without fear of being murdered by a xstian) We «nones» are growing in number each day.

Hence we find the apologist Justin, for example, declaring» scarcely a century after Jesus» that «those who, before Christ, led a life accompanied by reason are Christians, even if they were known as atheists.

On the contrary, he finds it useful to ponder an array of reductionist attempts to explain the existence of religion, from that which seeks to pinpoint the area of the human brain or the specific genes connected to religiosity to that which sees religion as a malfunction of the human mind or a vestigial remnant from a primitive stage of human development suitable only for whimpering, immature dullards (a point of view championed by the new atheists).

This country was either founded by completely blind morons who were ignorant and should have been Atheists in the first place or... maybe they were on to something, and that's what made the United States the greatest country in the world.

I like most atheists found our way free of religion by a method of study and reasoning.

For example, it's unusual to find an atheist that believes in ghosts or any type of paranormal «phenomena», Sasquatch, visitation by aliens, witchcraft, crystal healing, homeopathy, etc..

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others - those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence fo the lord our God the reason we are here...

some that with out self thought knowledge who called themselves athiest are really confused and truelly believe what they are saying even when wrong they believe to be telling the truth now that is not all atheist some are really cruel and mean to deceived others — those who are not stading in solid ground are those worth reaching out to - cause they need to know truth from false testimony... those who trully know God can not depart from him but there are those who blindly fight their way away from him... evil is blind and can't see the presence of god — that was God's course for rebelion... only a pure soul can be reach by the creator now that is not that easy to keep so its only through faith and the acceptance of jesus sacrifice for the human race that is posible to find the way and acceptance required by God in his second agreement to menkind... jesus was the lamb who took all our sin so even with a blind soul one can find the way to the creator and at one time if any find themselves in the presence of the lord our God the reason we are here...

Just type down the word «religion, jesus, god» in the CNN search box and you will find a large number of articles with pages of commentaries made by atheists using name calling toward a small amount of religious people compare to atheists who are posting.

Unlike God Is Not Dead, where the atheist professor is portrayed as blindly antagonistic toward people of faith, Martin's frustrations with religion are reasonable and relatable, especially given the circumstances, and I found myself nodding along as he urged Philomena to confront the evil done to her by the Church.