Our team of legal professionals strives to provide clients with timely information needed to make well -
founded decisions in their case.
Not exact matches
Nicola Sturgeon was speaking at First Ministers Questions after judges
found in favour of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde which was appealing against a
decision of the Court of Session
in Edinburgh last year
in the
case of Mary Doogan and Connie Wood.
The bishops of Missouri have taken a cautious middle position and
found the
decision in the Nancy Cruzan
case to be acceptable.
«
In light of the unforeseeable changes in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raqu
In light of the unforeseeable changes
in established first amendment law set forth in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raqu
in established first amendment law set forth
in recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raqu
in recent
decisions of the United States Supreme Court,» the court said, «justice demands that we analyze the present
case in light of the protections found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raqu
in light of the protections
found in the Minnesota Constitution.&raqu
in the Minnesota Constitution.»
Justice Emmett handed down his much anticipated
decision in the ACCC v Metcash merger
case,
finding in favour of Metcash.
The ACCC has announced it will appeal the Air Cargo cartel
decision; the
case failed at first instance because the Court
found there was no relevant «markt
in Australia».
Normally I can
find massive flaws
in Wenger's
decisions and tactics, but
in this
case I must say the players were primarily to fault for the weak play.
let's face it, everyone and his brother has known what our deficiencies have been for several years, so why can't our management team seem to identify our weaknesses and aggressively target the necessary additions... the only plausible answer is we aren't willing to pay even close to market value for the players we clearly need and if we do actually get to the table we seem to make insulting bids that simple infuriate the team
in question... for years Wenger has said he couldn't
find any world class players to fill our voids, which seems to suggest that he thinks we currently have upwards of 40 world class players on our existing roster... if that is the
case he should never be
in charge of making personnel
decisions... buying late
in the window is so problematic, for obvious reasons, and especially since this year was supposed to be different (sarcasm)
I suppose it is a
case of seeing how he does
in pre-season and then making a
decision but it is probably best to try and
find a good loan spell for him.
The court, whose
decision is final, said
in a statement Tuesday that it had examined the cycling union's biological passport program as a part of Caucchioli's
case and «
found that the strict application of such program could be considered as a reliable means of detecting indirect doping methods.»
The
findings in this study also provide new evidence for pediatricians as they provide guidance to breastfeeding mothers who may be considering incorporating formula into their infant's diet, and they may have implications for
decisions around the use of donor human milk
in cases when supplementation is needed.
The Second Circuit
found that a new Supreme Court
decision narrowing public corruption laws
in a
case involving former Virginia Gov. Robert McDonnell required different instructions than those used by Manhattan U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni.
«However, this remains a very complex
case involving legal advice relating to the
decision in question, particular features of the children's background and an external agency responsible for
finding and providing the foster carers concerned.»
What you
find at the end is that the people whose
decision should ordinarily carry the day are left traumatised and disillusioned only for the circle to be repeated
in another four or two years as
in the
case of local government elections.
«That is a significant part of this
decision, that they
find sufficient evidence not only because it means he could be retried but also because it shows there is sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction
in this
case upon retrial,» he said.
In at least one case, the candidate's decision to bow out appears to be a strategic move by the Senate Republicans in hopes of finding someone stronger to run for a seat they very much need to keep — especially now that they have four empty seats to defen
In at least one
case, the candidate's
decision to bow out appears to be a strategic move by the Senate Republicans
in hopes of finding someone stronger to run for a seat they very much need to keep — especially now that they have four empty seats to defen
in hopes of
finding someone stronger to run for a seat they very much need to keep — especially now that they have four empty seats to defend.
«This prosecution, based on information provided by someone of utterly unreliable credibility, seeks to criminalize conduct that the Supreme Court of the United States recently
found to be not unlawful,» Percoco's attorney Barry Bohrer said
in a statement, referring to the high court's recent
decision in a
case involving former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell.
The
decision found that a quid pro quo arrangement must show some kind of direct benefit to the person paying the alleged bribes — or,
in de Blasio's
case, the legal campaign contributions.
«
In our
case study, we
found that employers often saw breastfeeding as a personal
decision, and therefore were unwilling to bring up the issue to their employees, even at crucial moments, such as when mothers file the required paperwork for family medical leave.
A report released
in March by the UK Department for Business, Innovation and Skills suggests an answer: «It appears to be more a
case of ignorance rather than
decisions to go
in other directions due to well -
founded negative views [of STEM careers],» it says.
In a 2006 study of jury
decision making, social psychologist Samuel Sommers of Tufts University
found that racially diverse groups exchanged a wider range of information during deliberation about a sexual assault
case than all - white groups did.
Improved diagnostic tests are on the horizon, but we need huge efforts to increase their accuracy, use them for active
case finding in the community, and eventually make them available
in low income countries so as to inform treatment
decisions and preserve the efficacy of any new antibiotic drugs for TB,» says lead author of the Commission Professor Keertan Dheda, University of Cape Town.
Hepburn says DARPA wants to
find technologies that U.S. health officials can use to make
decisions in the
case of an outbreak.
The U.S. Supreme Court last week let stand a lower - court
decision finding that Arizona school districts could be sued for damages
in federal court,
in a
case brought by an employee who claimed she was fired for objecting to district requests that she affix a flagpole to her wheelchair to make her more visible to students.
The
decision marks the first time a school district has been
found negligent
in a
case involving a student's suicide, and legal observers say the
decision could precipitate an avalanche of liability claims against school systems.
The course's
case study - based approach challenged me to place myself
in the leadership position, play out different scenarios, and build my confidence
in navigating complex
decisions as well as working with teams to
find creative solutions.
The court distinguished the Jordan and Kotterman
decisions as to this point,
finding that the facts were different
in those
cases.
In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in the Seattle - Louisville case, Jon served as Co-Chair of the Montclair, New Jersey Taskforce on School Integration, which found ways to preserve that district's controlled choice program without relying on individual student rac
In the wake of the Supreme Court's
decision in the Seattle - Louisville case, Jon served as Co-Chair of the Montclair, New Jersey Taskforce on School Integration, which found ways to preserve that district's controlled choice program without relying on individual student rac
in the Seattle - Louisville
case, Jon served as Co-Chair of the Montclair, New Jersey Taskforce on School Integration, which
found ways to preserve that district's controlled choice program without relying on individual student race.
The Supreme Court regularly sends back pending
cases for a re-airing after it renders
decisions that seem legally relevant, but such a move does mean that the court believes there is a «reasonable probability» that a lower court may come to a different
decision in light of its
findings.
Maeve soon
finds herself entangled
in a
case with a thousand leads that all seem to point nowhere, and it doesn't help that her boss, whom she trusts more than almost anyone, is starting to make
decisions that Maeve
finds questionable at best.
It also gives the grieving spouse or partner time to make
decisions, or
in some
cases find work outside the home, without worrying about finances.
While it still reversed the district court dismissal and remanded the
case back to the court,
in its most recent
decision, the 9th Circuit based its discussion on the U.S. Supreme Court's
finding in Dudenhoeffer that there is no presumption of prudence for employee stock ownership plan fiduciaries beyond the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) exemption from the otherwise applicable duty to diversify.
Unprejudiced and positive tests are therefore greatly needed, and these can only be
found in show and trials under judges who have the common interest so keenly
in view that they will allow neither friendship nor personal bias to control the awards; men who will bear ever
in mind that upon their
decision will greatly depend the future reputation of the animal
in the stud, and who will therefore examine carefully each specimen before them, giving due credit to beauty and blood, but
in all
cases where possible requiring also performance were they pronounce a favorable verdict».
However, she did cite one
case by the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1920, Nicchia v. New York, and alleged that the
decision found that it was «unconstitutional to have breed - specific ordinances» (her exact words).
The ASPCA expects animal sheltering organizations to make every effort to
find adoption or placement options for the animals
in their care, while also recognizing that shelters require discretion to make the best
decisions for those animals and the communities
in which they live, particularly
in cases involving severe behavior or medical issues or dogs deemed dangerous under applicable law.
In both
cases, you'll
find fast paced game play with snap
decision making.
But then I
found the beautiful Appendix the Court created for the
decision, and I realized it deserved a permanent place
in the history of the
case, a book of its own.
2) As above, advocacy is inevitably to be
found in some (most) scientists when it comes to defending their ideas and intellectual work (although
in most areas of science, the knock - on of this advocacy [
in terms of policy
decisions] is much less than is the
case presently
in climate science).
The
decision references a previous
case in which «the court
found that certain published comments were not defamatory because they were so ludicrous and outrageous as to be unbelievable and therefore incapable of lowering the reputation of the plaintiff
in the minds of right - thinking persons.»
PARENTEAU: It's testing these theories which are very similar against a body of state law,
in different states as you just mentioned, and so it's probing, it's trying to
find a breakthrough
case where you can
find a state supreme court willing to make a really bold
decision finding not only a right to a healthy environment, or a safe climate, stable climate, but also
finding a duty on the part of the government to take real tangible action to address that.
In Mass. v. EPA, the Court based its
decision partly on the view that an endangerment
finding would not lead to «extreme measures,» such as an outright ban on motor vehicle greenhouse gas emissions.76 However, requiring tens of thousands of small sources to obtain PSD permits and 6.1 million to obtain Title V permits annually would be an extreme
case.
Prohibition — which you promote — is command and control regulation with police action enforcing the will of the state; privatization — which is the only answer to the AGU
findings — devolves power from the state's command and control structure (
in this
case the EPA and judiciary) to the individual
decisions of how to spend their money and how much to demand for their services by hardworking American families.
The CJEU answered that even a
decision of non lieu (i.e. a
finding that there was no ground to refer the
case to a trial court because of insufficient evidence) is a
decision on the merits of the
case and bars further prosecution
in another Member State.
I took a few days off last week and was disappointed to return and
find that the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had issued a
decision barring the webcasting of a hearing
in a recording industry file - sharing
case pending
in federal court
in Boston.
Unfortunately, for those interested
in following
decisions on patent remedies,
in most
cases the patents are
found invalid, not infringed or a settlement is reached prior... [more]
In a 9 - 0 decision, the Alabama Supreme Court agreed, finding that the product had been substantially altered after leaving the possession of CNH America and remanded the case back to the trial court for entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of CN
In a 9 - 0
decision, the Alabama Supreme Court agreed,
finding that the product had been substantially altered after leaving the possession of CNH America and remanded the
case back to the trial court for entry of judgment as a matter of law
in favor of CN
in favor of CNH.
Pursuant to South Carolina Rule of Family Court 26 (a & b): An order or judgment pursuant to an adjudication
in a domestic relations
case shall set forth the specific
findings of fact and conclusions of law to support the court's
decision.
However, trials often call for creativity
in the absence of clear guidance, and anyone considering taking legal action to redress an injury should consider
finding counsel capable of making informed, calculated
decisions in order to best present the
case.
I believe, with respect, that this approach or principle can be
found well expressed
in a
case that was cited to us, Lebon Construction Ltd. v. Wiebe (1995), 10 B.C.L.R. (3d) 102 (C.A.), a recent
decision of this court.
The Court
found that the interpretation of insurance contracts involves a unique blend of the general principles of interpretation applicable to all contracts and the unique principles applicable
in the insurance setting.22 While courts have
found that the «language of the policy» is the most important factor
in determining whether coverage is granted or excluded, courts have
found that where there is genuine ambiguity or doubt, the duty to defend ought to be resolved
in favour of the insured.23 Similarly other insurance law principles should be considered, such as the principle that coverage provisions should be construed broadly and exclusion clauses should be construed narrowly.24 It was this last principle that the Court looked to
in making a
decision in this
case.