Sentences with phrase «founded under the premise»

Not exact matches

«The searches were authorized by a federal magistrate judge, who had found probable cause to believe that the premises and devices searched contained evidence, fruits, and instrumentalities of conduct for which Cohen is under criminal investigation,» the Justice Department's filing said.

I do not find death to be such a desolate proposition under the assumed premise that there might be no heaven.

«We believe America was founded on the premise of uniting people from different countries, religions, and colors, and we welcome diversity under the enlightened understanding that it is not a weakness but rather our greatest strength.

They work under the premise that ambition and drive are traits that successful people also want to find in a potential partner.

Australian motor museum — Peter May finds one where the Avon runs through Yorkshire / Churchill's Daimler — The just restored Daimler that Winston Churchill used in the early 30's / Howard's Way — We visit the London premises of C.A.R. Howars vintage car dealer / VSCC Lakeland trial — Tom Threlfall has been mud - plugging in the Lake District / Circuit des Remparts — Toby Ross reports on a race around the old walled town of Angouleme / Down - under London to Brighton.

Claims under this coverage don't require a finding of fault, they just require that the injury have happened on your premises.

Sad stories have been told about cruel extortionists who extracted large cash rewards from grieving pet owners under the premise of having «found» their pets.

Although these do not qualify for the exemption based on owning four or fewer breeding females and selling puppies born and raised on your premises, APHIS might find their sale exempt under other provisions of the AWA regulations.

Serving food under the premise «Eat Local» you'll find traditional dishes with a modern twist.

Where a person has been arrested for an indictable (formerly an arrestable) offence, s 18 (1) of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE 1984), as amended by the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, empowers the police to enter and search any premises «occupied or controlled» by the person under arrest where the relevant officer has reasonable grounds for suspecting that he will find on the premises evidence relating to the indictable offence for which the person has been arrested, or evidence relating to some other indictable offence which is connected with or similar to that offence.

The owner of such premises may be found liable for injuries sustained by a child as a result of such exposure under the law of premises liability.

If a pregnant woman is injured on someone's premises and the injury is found to have been a cause of the death of the fetus she was carrying, the owner, operator, or manager of the premises may be held liable under the law of premises liability for the death of the fetus.

By invoking the personal information exemption under s. 21 (1), some tribunals appear to largely refuse or widely redact claims based on the broad definition of «personal information,» rather than utilizing the premise of production found under s. 10 (1).

The owners and operators of such premises may be found liable for such injuries under the law of premises liability.

Section 8 - 1801 (a)(1)(A) defines «at large» as follows: «The term «animal at large» means any animal found off the premises of its owner and neither leashed nor otherwise under the immediate control of a person capable of physically restraining it.»

As a threshold matter, in order for this Court to find that MQH and the Diocese owed a duty to the Chances under premises liability law, the injuries in question must have occurred on their property.

They are usually found under the «Termination», «Decommissioning», «Landlord Work» or «Tenant Work» clauses and dictate the condition in which the tenant must leave the premises once the lease is terminated.

L.B. Kaye International Realty Commercial Svcs., Inc. v. 100 Varick Realty (15 A.D. 3d 176) judgment awarding plaintiff real estate broker damages in the principal amount of $ 133,761.00 affirmed; appellate court does not disturb trial court's finding that defendant intentionally excluded broker from exercising the exclusive leasing rights it obtained under the brokerage agreement thereby entitling broker to full commission when defendant leased the premises covered by the agreement on its own.

2d 651) holding that no cause of action exists under the Property Condition Disclosure Act; court finds buyer entitled to $ 500.00 credit under RPL § 465 (1) where seller delivered an incomplete Property Condition Disclosure Statement; seller failed to perform the duty to deliver a Disclosure Statement pursuant to the PCDA when the statement was incomplete; cause of action exists under RPL § 462 (2) for willful failure to perform the requirements of the PCDA where (i) a deliberate misstatement or misstatements in a fully completed and timely delivered PCDS regarding the defective condition complained of (ii) that would tend to assure a reasonably prudent buyer that no such condition existed, and (iii) which a professional inspector might not discover upon an inspection of the premises that would meet generally accepted standards in the trade; definition of «willful failure to perform» acknowledges legislative intent not to alter the respective burdens of the buyer and seller in the transactions; statutory cause of action replaces buyer's burden of having to plead and prove the seller's active physical concealment of the condition with proof that the misstatement about the condition on the PCDS was deliberate