The 600 - plus - page report that resulted looks at a variety of ways fracking could have an effect on local drinking water: withdrawing millions of gallons of water needed to frack a well, improperly mixing chemicals with the water at the well, injecting that
fracking fluid into the ground at high pressure to fracture rock as much as two miles beneath the surface, handling the contaminated water then produced by the well and finally improperly storing or disposing of that water.
Moreover, scientists suspect that the injection of used
fracking fluid into deep disposal wells may have triggered dozens of recent small earthquakes in northeastern Ohio and north Texas.
California officials have ordered an emergency shut - down of 11 oil waste injection sites and a review of over 100 others in the Central Valley for fear that companies may have been pumping
fracking fluids into drinking water aquifers.
A separate study at Cornell University recently identified yet another mechanism increasing the risk of carrying contaminants from the path of
the fracking fluids into clean groundwater reservoirs: the same properties that make the fluids effective at fracking help fracking fluids dissolve contaminants like heavy metals that up until now have clung safely to soils in the form of colloids.
Not exact matches
If they survive, then it will be a good demonstration that
fracking is unlikely to harm New Yorkers, even if some of the
fracking «
fluid» seeps
into our underground aquifers.
As the toxic
fracking fluids migrate
into the local water table, it will add some extra pizazz -LRB-!)
Improperly drilled wells or faulty well casings can leak
fracking fluids and methane gas
into nearby aquifers and water wells.
That surge has coincided in time and place with the boom in unconventional oil and gas extraction such as hydraulic fracturing, or «
fracking,» in which high - pressure
fluid is injected
into the ground to break up the underlying rock and release trapped gas or oil.
In 2011, in response to growing public concern about the possible environmental and human health effects of
fracking wastewater, Pennsylvania's Department of Environmental Protection requested that the discharge of
fracking fluids and other unconventional oil and gas wastewater
into surface waters be prohibited from central water - treatment facilities that release high salinity effluents.
But Clarens says
fracking fluids could theoretically leak
into aquifers, because the wells must be dug through shallow layers where the aquifers lie in order to reach shales.
California officials have ordered an emergency shut - down of 11 oil and gas waste injection sites and a review more than 100 others in the state's drought - wracked Central Valley out of fear that companies may have been pumping
fracking fluids and other toxic waste
into drinking water aquifers there.
Investigations by The New York Times last winter revealed that sewage - treatment plants processing
fracking wastewater are discharging radioactive
fluid into public waterways, in some cases upstream of intake sites for drinking water.
But according to a panel of geologists at the AAAS Annual Meeting, the culprit isn't hydraulic fracturing, or «
fracking,» in which geologists crack open subsurface rocks to extract oil and gas; instead, it's the processes associated with pumping wastewater and other
fluids back
into the ground.
Fracking has already drawn considerable scrutiny from environmental groups, unhappy homeowners, and teams of lawyers who blame the drilling method for polluting pristine rivers, turning bucolic farmlands
into noisy industrial zones, and leaking enough methane to make ordinary tap water as flammable as lighter
fluid.
Fracking — or hydraulic fracturing — is a process in which rocks are deliberately fractured to release oil or gas by injecting highly pressurised
fluid into a borehole.
Typically,
fracking involves injections
into impermeable rock layers that inhibit the spread of
fluid and increase pore pressure.
My concern is that many will read the title, «Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania,» and immediately infer that residual treatment water (i.e.,
frack fluid) is most likely to leak
into groundwater from depths of several thousand feet.
The study found no evidence of contamination from chemical - laden
fracking fluids, which are injected
into gas wells to help break up shale deposits, or from «produced water,» wastewater that is extracted back out of the wells after the shale has been fractured....
It's from instances where waste
fluids — for example, the water used in
fracking — are injected deep
into the earth.
Then a mixture, commonly known as
fracking fluid, of water (90 percent), sand (9.5 percent) and chemicals (0.5 percent) is pumped
into the well under high pressure to create micro-fractures in the shale and free the natural gas or oil.
During offshore
fracking, a significant amount of
fracking fluid returns to the surface and is either discharged
into the ocean or transported for onshore ground injection.
«What's even more inexcusable is that some
fracking fluids were discharged directly
into the ocean without any scientific understanding of how these chemicals impact ocean ecosystems,» said Sekich.
Fracking opened up vast swaths of once - quiet forest and farmland to the constant grinding of truck traffic heading to drilling rigs that operate all day and night, poisoning the air with diesel fumes and sometimes spilling toxic drilling
fluids onto fields and
into streams.
The Duke study found no evidence of contamination from chemicals in the
fracking fluids that are injected
into gas wells to help break up shale deposits, or from produced water.
Even the Obama - era Environmental Protection Agency, which harbored little affection for the energy industry, concluded that
fracking is «unlikely to generate sufficient pressure to drive
fluids into shallow drinking water zones.»
But the idea stressed by
fracking critics that deep - injected
fluids will migrate
into groundwater is mostly false.
In any case, after the
frack fluid is captured, the well is capped with a group of pipes and valves, commonly known as a «Christmas tree,» that direct the gas
into into the pipeline and processing system.
Did
fracking fluids ever contain industrial waste mixtures which, if pumped
into the ground for non-gas production purposes, would have been regulated as hazardous waste?
During the
fracking process, millions of gallons of
fracking fluid — a mixture of water, sand and toxic chemicals — are injected
into the ground to break up the shale and release natural gas.
But
fracking, which involves the high - pressure injection of water or a
fluid mixture
into a borehole to create cracks in deep - rock formations through which gas or petroleum can flow, is inherently dangerous.