Not exact matches
The
study was funded by EnCana, the drilling company whose
wells the EPA had initially blamed for the contamination.Though the role of
fracking remains contested, the advising scientists recommend that the EPA should qualify its conclusions about the risks posed by acknowledging gaps in the existing data and concerning cases like Pavillion.
The EPA's
study found that between 25,000 to 30,000 new
wells were drilled each year between 2011 and 2014 and that 9.4 million Americans live within a mile of a
fracking site.
Further, the Duke
study did not detect
fracking fluids in any of the
wells tested.
One
study out of Duke University found a higher - than - average presence of methane in water
wells located close to
fracking operations, but methane in groundwater can come from a variety of sources, including organic decomposition near the surface.
He obviously also does not realize that once this decsion was reached, a reversal would require changing again the SGEIS which will now presumably point out the problems with
fracking as
well as the Health Department's
study.
There was a time when the administration was preparing to allow a limited number of
wells in the Southern Tier, as trial - ballooned in the New York Times in 2012, and as evidenced by its extraordinary care in editing and delaying a federal
fracking study around that time to lessen the appearance of environmental risk.
A two - year
study of
fracking wells in Los Angeles, conducted by consultants Cardno Entrix and funded by the oil industry, monitored 15 environmental factors before and after
fracking, including groundwater chemistry, vibration at the surface and at depth, and methane release.
A new
study has found that a small number of gas
wells are releasing significant quantities of methane into the air even before they are hydraulically fractured, or
fracked.
«By measuring naturally occurring ammonium and iodide in numerous samples from different geological formations in the Appalachian Basin, including flowback waters from shale gas
wells in the Marcellus and Fayetteville shale formations, we show that
fracking fluids are not much different from conventional oil and gas wastes,» said Jennifer S. Harkness, lead author of the
study and a PhD student at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment.
By measuring an uptick in online searches as
well as social media chatter and mass media coverage, Ion Bogdan Vasi, an associate professor of sociology at the UI and corresponding author of a new
study, demonstrated how local screenings of Gasland — a 2010 American documentary that focused on communities affected by natural gas drilling — affected the public debate on hydraulic
fracking.
As
fracking and refracturing become more common to make
wells produce more oil and gas, it adds to an already fraught competition among agriculture, aquatic ecosystems, and municipalities for water supplies, the
study says.
Last year, for instance, an industry - funded
study on the methane emissions from
fracking wells was published in the prestigious journal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Now a
study has shown that the real safety concern is the proximity of water
wells to gas
wells, and that
fracking does not appear to increase the risk of water contamination.
The researchers found 532
wells, or 1.3 percent of those
studied, that were
fracked about 300 meters or less from the surface — within the depth range of drinking water
wells.
Because the location of so many
wells is not known - a common phenomenon in many regions where
fracking takes place - the
study uses a mathematical model to predict the likelihood that the hydraulically induced fractures of a randomly placed new
well would connect to an existing wellbore.
As debate roils over EPA regulations proposed this month limiting the release of the potent greenhouse gas methane during
fracking operations, a new University of Vermont
study funded by the National Science Foundation shows that abandoned oil and gas
wells near
fracking sites can be conduits for methane escape not currently being measured.
The
study, to be published in Water Resources Research on October 20, demonstrates that fractures in surrounding rock produced by the hydraulic fracturing process are able to connect to preexisting, abandoned oil and gas
wells, common in
fracking areas, which can provide a pathway to the surface for methane.
The most recent such
study, published in Environmental Science & Technology, finds that at least 6,900 oil and gas
wells in the U.S. were
fracked less than a mile (5,280 feet) from the surface, and at least 2,600
wells were
fracked at depths shallower than 3,000 feet, some as shallow as 100 feet.
Amy Townsend - Small, the lead researcher for GRO and a UC assistant professor of geology, says the UC
study is unique in comparison with
studies on water
wells in other shale - rich areas of the U.S. where
fracking is taking place — such as the Marcellus Shale region of Pennsylvania.
The team applied the technology, called pressurized magic angle spinning, to
studies involving underground carbon storage,
fracking wells, and tracking complex chemical reactions in fuel production.
None of the
wells in the area were being
fracked at the time, and none were in the «flowback» stage, according to the
study.
The
study, «Toward a
better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development,» was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and undertaken by Dana R. Caulton and Paul B. Shepson of Purdue and a host of co-authors, including Anthony Ingraffea and Robert Howarth, Cornell scientists who are prominent foes of
fracking, along with Renee Santoro of Physicians Scientists & Engineers for Healthy Energy, a nonprofit group that has been critical of
fracking * (Ingraffea is affiliated with the group, as
well).
[11:20 p.m. Updated Prompted by Twitter discussions (more evidence that 140 characters can matter) I'm adding this note to stress that publicity has preceded peer review on research supportive of
fracking, as
well, as was the case recently with a State University of New York, Buffalo,
study.]
The
study found no evidence of contamination from chemical - laden
fracking fluids, which are injected into gas
wells to help break up shale deposits, or from «produced water,» wastewater that is extracted back out of the
wells after the shale has been fractured....
Like in Dallas, TX which recently passed a measure prohibiting oil and gas
wells within 1,500 feet of homes, a de facto
fracking ban, and Los Angeles, which approved a moratorium on
fracking until the impacts of the practice can be more thoroughly
studied.
For more information, go to
Fracking and air pollution According to the
study conducted by professor Robert W. Howarth of Cornell University, «3.6 % to 7.9 % of the methane from shale - gas production escapes to the atmosphere in venting and leaks over the lifetime of a
well.»
The Duke
study found no evidence of contamination from chemicals in the
fracking fluids that are injected into gas
wells to help break up shale deposits, or from produced water.
The Lisa Mckensey
study and report shows that living within a half mile of a
fracking well results in a 66 percent increase in cancer.
A
study by Carnegie Mellon University noted that the amount of water required to drill all 2,916 of the
fracking wells in the Marcellus Shale in the first 11 months of 2010 would equal the amount of drinking water used by just one city, Pittsburgh, during the same period.
Now a new
study aimed to
better understand cumulative effects of natural occurrences and new anthropogenic pathways, through
fracking - drilling.
Studies have suggested that
better management can minimize the risk of
fracking related earthquakes.
Researchers have just reported the results of their
study into the source of water contamination related to
fracking wells in Pennsylvania and Texas.
Another
study showing how
fracking is hardly an unqualified
good as it's proponents would have you believe: A new
study shows that while in the short term hydraulic fracturing
wells will likely have little impact on tourism, over time the increased
Don't look to this
study for an objective and
well - reasoned scientific analysis of the relative risks for people living near
fracking operations, though.
«When it comes to the proximity of active oil or gas
wells, there is no definitive evidence that
fracking impacted 2015 home values,» the Ballotpedia
study concluded.