A regulation based on a robust
framework of science can be adjusted as the analysis matures.
Instead of seeing large collaborations of meticulous, careful, critical scientists, we instead see a small team of incompetent cowboys, abusing almost every aspect of
the framework of science to build a fortress around their «old boys» club», to prevent real scientists from seeing the shambles of their «research».
1) Is «CAGW» as they insist on calling it a falsifiable theory within the Popperian
framework of science?
The project was pursued within
the framework of the Science for Life Laboratory (SciLifeLab) collaborative research initiative at Uppsala University.
Should the ontology of the cosmological
framework of science be as limited as the ontology of science itself»?
They work with
the framework of science where everything has to be proven using the scientific method, yet on Sunday they throw all of that out the window and pray to some form of imaginary being that has zero proof of it's existence.
Not exact matches
While the concept
of the semantic tree may only be familiar to those with a computer
science background (here's a pretty good basic explainer from Quora, if you're interested), the gist
of Musk's advice should be clear to anyone: don't wade into the weeds
of a subject before you have a conceptual
framework — the main ideas and debates at the heart
of the discipline — mastered.
Even though it contains nothing that even vaguely resembles «
science,» this 1910 book provided the intellectual
framework for thousands
of personal wealth - building seminars.
Another problem is that NASA earth
science is more than people — it's buildings, systems, and machines that are now woven into the
framework of the space agency and could not cheaply or efficiently be extracted.
Buyer persona development must be coupled with the techniques
of the social
sciences of social and business anthropology to develop a new role and
framework for being
of value to strategy within organizations.
The Faith movement has this principle at the heart
of its approach to the formation
of young Catholics, seeking to foster an inquisitive approach to the faith, just as in the natural
sciences, and to develop such intellectual curiosity within a theological
framework that is faithful to Christ's Magisterium and to our understanding
of the created universe.
In
science, the word theory refers to a well - supported, well - established
framework for understanding a set
of observations (e.g., the theory
of gravity, the theory
of relativity, germ theory, etc).
«
Science fiction fulfills many
of the same needs for wonder and awe that religion used to fill, but within the context
of a more intellectualized, scientific
framework.
In
science, as distinct from theology, a critical comparison
of the competing theories,
of the competing
frameworks, is always possible.
Normal
science, says Kuhn, consists
of work within the
framework of a paradigm which defines a coherent research tradition.
Thereby they guide the direction
of normal research, which is «an attempt to force nature into the preformed and relatively inflexible boxes that the paradigm supplies».18 Like solving a puzzle or playing a game
of chess, normal
science seeks solutions within an accepted
framework; the rules
of the game are already established.
A self - limiting God, the humble God
of revelation, makes more sense within an evolutionary
framework than in any others that have been proposed so far by
science.
The ethical
framework for biological
science must be based on the same principles
of truth and meaning by which we as Christians judge all things, material and spiritual.
The Supreme Court has dealt the creationists a crushing blow, and state boards
of education are beginning to adopt «
science frameworks.»
The teacher's approach to such problems might start from three assumptions: (a) the teacher should be concerned with how
science fits into the larger
framework of life, and the student should raise questions about the meaning
of what he studies and its relation to other fields; (b) controversial questions can be treated, not in a spirit
of indoctrination, but with an emphasis on asking questions and helping students think through assumptions and implications; an effort should be made to present viewpoints other than one's own as fairly as possible, respecting the integrity
of the student by avoiding undue imposition
of the lecturer's beliefs; (c) presuppositions inevitably enter the classroom presentation
of many subjects, so that a viewpoint frankly and explicitly recognized may be less dangerous than one which is hidden and assumed not to exist.
In the Faith synthesis, the «Unity - Law
of control and direction» is the key philosophical
framework in which to develop an orthodox, dynamic theology that can have an invigorating and enriching relationship with the natural and medical
sciences.
Likewise, the disciplined imagination
of speculative reason can surmount the interminable conflicts between man and nature, mind and body, freedom and determinism, religion and
science, by assigning each its rightful place within a larger systematic
framework.
Scientists and thinkers have developed a variety
of conceptual
frameworks — ecology, for example — that attempt to intellectually grasp this great need to make sense, to organize complexity; but I think it is a fundamental mistake — be we scientists, ministers, or otherwise — to think that only
science and engineering and business are attempting to deal with this problem
of complexity, simultaneity, and constant change.
Laudato Si does not explain how modern
science can recover a sense
of humility and wonder, nor does it lay down a natural - law
framework for the proper development
of technology.
The revelation
of God, given in Scripture, is regarded as authoritative only insofar as it provides clarifying images which illuminate experience as it is critically interpreted by reason.Theology within this
framework articulates the meaning
of the inherited tradition
of the Christian community in the light
of empirical knowledge supplied by the
sciences.
Imaginative reason in the form
of a speculative philosophy such as Whitehead's can surmount the interminable conflicts between man and nature, mind and body, freedom and determinism, religion and
science, by assigning each its rightful place within a larger systematic
framework.
Religious leaders, I think, face alternatives not easily reconciled: to try to form communities in which biblical imagery and ideas provide an alternative vision to our cultural ones, or to engage in a process
of mutual critique, edification, correction and revision
of frameworks that are informed both by our religious traditions and by the
sciences and culture.
Wilson's «consilience» aims to provide a comprehensive
framework for relating all the various disciplines
of knowledge under the banner
of natural
science.
Over the last five - hundred years
science has found universes far beyond our imagination, it has broken the
framework of the Judeo creation myth and traced the evolution
of life out
of some primordial muck.
He explains more precisely what he means in his response to the critics: «in using the word faith I refer to the metaphysical
framework, sharedby monotheism and
science (but not by many other cultures),
of a rational ground that underpins physical existence.
It has been replaced by a variety
of frameworks, among them a «vital movement in the social
sciences which construes and explicates human reality in terms
of the theatre and dramaturgy.»
By placing the dialogue between religion and
science within a
framework that strongly engages many
of the most important currents
of contemporary theology, Haught accomplishes what few others have.
Isabelle Stengers, who is a close collaborator
of Prigogine, and who, in fact, «holds the pen,» is very much interested in Whitehead's conceptual
framework and feels that it is quite adequate to address problems raised by contemporary
science, such as the emergence
of order and newness.
Science aims to answer the whys and hows
of the natural universe, while religion aims to lay a
framework for morality and social conduct.
Now in mathematics insight into the relationship among ideas may indeed be «self - authenticating», at least within the
framework of accepted axioms and rules; but in
science this is not the case because one is not dealing with relationships among ideas alone.
When in reality,
science is the
framework of gods thoughts.
We need a
science and technology reinterpreted within a new
framework which takes the organic and spiritual dimensions
of reality seriously along with the mechanical.
They are seeking what has been called post-modern paradigms for «an open secular democratic culture» within the
framework of a public philosophy (Walter Lippman) or Civil Religion (Robert Bellah) or a new genuine realistic humanism or at least a body
of insights about the nature
of being and becoming human, evolved through dialogue among renascent religions, secularist ideologies including the philosophies
of the tragic dimension
of existence and disciplines
of social and human
sciences which have opened themselves to each other in the context
of their common sense
of historical responsibility and common human destiny.
A general ontology is designed to provide a
framework for interpretation
of such areas as experience,
science, art, ethics, and religion.
While
science does tend to mold reality in fixed and static
frameworks, the history
of this very
science itself is a series
of creative advances forward, and these are the workings
of intuition.
Moreover, within the
framework of these rubrics, it does not really make sense why Whitehead from 1912 on wrote and published — in addition to studies in natural philosophy and natural
science — a series
of what may be called contributions to popular philosophy, a genre which the secondary literature usually passes by In our reconstruction
of the development
of Whitehead's basic philosophical problem the significance
of this phase
of his activity becomes obvious.
Far from being anti-scientific or anti-intellectual, the notion
of ethics informed by religious faith provides a
framework for the application
of that which we learn from
science» a
framework which
science alone can not elucidate.
I am interested in the consequences
of adopting a
framework of process cosmology for research in the neural and behavioral
sciences.
Not only has daily life been transformed by
science — for example, we no longer look to the realm
of the sacred for a
framework to organize our lives — even Western religion itself has become more rational, less «superstitious.»
One important one is that we absorb from the age
of science and technology the materialistic
framework within which it was developed.
It works under the Philippine regulatory
framework, called the Biosafety Committee
of the Department
of Science and Technology (DOST - BC), which oversees IRRI's IBC and, through the IBC, all research on GM rice at IRRI.
Rooted in sound
science and common sense, these principles provide a
framework of an overarching philosophy: Listen to your baby, and trust your instincts!
Programs are aligned with the Massachusetts Department
of Education
frameworks with strands in Life
Science, Earth
Science, History, and / or Geography.
As
of 2016, the mechanism and effects
of climate change are integrated into the Massachusetts
Science, Technology, and Engineering
Frameworks for grades 9 - 12.
Programs are aligned with the Massachusetts Department
of Education
frameworks and cover strands in Life
Science, Earth
Science, History, and Geography.