Sentences with phrase «framing policy questions»

That said, the realities of what families of different income and educational levels are paying for center - based programs are important to framing policy questions.

I would frame the policy question as «What mix of policies can we use to ensure economic growth and the benefits of that growth are shared by all».

Not exact matches

While framing the problem as a question of terrorist financing has helped to garner additional policy resources and international attention, it has been sold as a win - win for environmentalists and counter-terrorists alike.

The UNFCCC has a particular policy agenda — Kyoto, Copenhagen, cap - and - trade, and all that — so the questions that they pose at the IPCC have been framed in terms of the UNFCCC agenda.

Public views on even the most familiar of the policy questions surrounding stem cell research are easily swayed in either direction by different framings of the facts and formulations of the questions, and sometimes the same respondents offered starkly opposite answers to similar questions asked in different ways.

That said, it's not clear why the survey made the effort to frame these questions as matters of «federal policy.»

After providing the political and cultural contexts for the rise of the testing accountability movement in the 1960s that culminated almost forty years later in No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, this book then moves on to provide a policy history and social policy analysis of value - added testing in Tennessee that is framed around questions of power relations, winners, and losers.

We also need the policy makers to better frame the questions that they need the scientists help on.

Stephen H. Schneider, a Stanford University climatologist immersed in climate science and policy for decades, framed the question a different way in the title of the last chapter of his new book on the climate challenge: «Can Democracy Survive Complexity?»

Framing questions of economics, ethics and other aspects of policy as «science issues» does no favor for either science or politics.

In revealing that the policy debate will inevitably come down to finding a balance, Rosenberg's piece helpfully reminds readers that climate science only frames this question, but does not offer a clear answer on what to do.

While it is a scientist's job to answer genuine scientific questions, getting pulled into contrarian linguistic frames helps maintain the fiction that the science is still riven with fundamental equivocations and therefore too uncertain to form a reliable basis for public policy.

So, instead of framing the question of global climate policy in terms of national self - interest, how about we frame it in terms of «doing the right thing»?

In my lengthier comment I did not discuss conclusions, I discussed only the way the question should be framed IMO to apply logically to the policy question rather than to science considered as separate from the policy questions.

You tried to frame a question about policy - relevance of GCMs as a delegitimisation of «all of climate science» (your words).

The UNFCCC has a particular policy agenda — Kyoto, Copenhagen, cap - and - trade, and all that — so the questions that they pose at the IPCC have been framed in terms of the UNFCCC agenda.

«If environmental decisions are fundamentally framed as questions of economic welfare,» Sagoff concludes, «public officials and the public itself will opt nearly every time for whatever policy promises more economic growth, more production, and more jobs.»

Remember to frame your question in compliance with the Comments Policy and lastly, to use the Preview function below the comment box to ensure that any html tags you're using work properly.

The key is to frame your question as an inquiry about how soon the organization will begin benefitting from the policy by implementing it, and that you are excited to see that happen.

Hitherto the two guiding principles have been that a court should be very reluctant to question a prosecutorial decision, especially where it has been reached on policy or public interest grounds, and second that once the prosecution has framed its indictment the trial judge has no power to «go behind» it and enquire why it is presented in the way that it is.

The question from clients is most often framed something like, «How long does the policy have to be in force before it pays?»