Sentences with phrase «fraud actions involving»

In court, his practice covers not only the general range of commercial disputes embraced in his arbitration practice but in addition he has appeared as Counsel in a number of fraud actions involving recovery of stolen property, Ponzi schemes, resolution of disputes between shareholders / joint venturers, breach of fiduciary duty, tortious conspiracy, professional negligence, structured financial products including Islamic finance.
David Joseph has acted as Sole or Junior Counsel in a number of complex fraud actions involving inter alia complex interlocutory relief, recovery of stolen property, resolution of disputes between shareholders / partners, allegations of fraud and deceit, breach of fiduciary duty and restraint of use of performance bonds and letters of credit.

Not exact matches

The firm represents clients in a wide variety of litigation and appellate matters, including matters involving real property, real estate finance, construction, development disputes and transactions, intellectual property disputes, business disputes, personal injury, fraud, shareholder disputes, and adversarial actions in bankruptcy court.
MomLifeTV believes it is necessary to share information in order to investigate, prevent, or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud, situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person, violations of our Terms of Use, or as otherwise required by law.
«We have taken decisive action against those who have been involved in this extremely serious, large scale, organised fraud of English language tests.
The trustees also authorized the district's lawyers to take legal action against any parties involved in any election fraud and agreed to ask the education commissioner to order a new vote for the two board seats.
We may also share information if it becomes necessary in order to investigate, prevent, or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud, situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person, violations of our Terms of Service, or as otherwise required by law.
We believe it is necessary to share information in order to investigate, prevent, or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud, situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person, violations of Inner Bonding's terms of use, or as otherwise required by law.
Believe it is necessary to share information in order to investigate, prevent or take action regarding illegal activities, suspected fraud, situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person, violations of Author Solutions, LLC's terms of use, or as otherwise required by law.
It may be necessary to share information in order to investigate, prevent, or take action regarding suspected or actual illegal activities, including without limitation, fraud, situations involving potential threats to the physical safety of any person, or as otherwise permitted or required by law.
Crowd funding and Internet offers: Small startups are among the risky investment categories, and the JOBS Act is likely to elongate a recent trend of more investigations and enforcement actions involving Internet fraud.
Levi & Korsinsky has expertise in prosecuting investor securities litigation and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud and represents investors throughout the nation, concentrating its practice in securities and shareholder litigation.
Grounds for removal may include, but are not limited to: violation of the Code of Conduct, Terms of Use, or Terms and Conditions; fraud; overtly dishonest posting; conviction for animal cruelty, neglect or any animal - related crimes; pending legal action involving the seizure of pets or other serious animal - related crimes; convictions for other crimes that include a prohibition on posting on family sites or the internet; violating the terms of your adoption contract with Petfinder visitors; failure to respond to direct inquiries from Petfinder via the contact information you have provided us; failure to modify any violations of the Terms of Use and Code of Conduct.
Everything about its actions and deliverables reeks of corruption, fraud, and propaganda, and everyone involved with it has been tained.
I have been involved in a variety of matters including cases involving undue influence, fraud, duress, joint accounts, constructive trust, contested and uncontested guardianships and fiduciary removal actions involving attorneys in fact, trustees, and personal representatives.
Acting for the defendants in respect of substantial and complex fraud claims arising out of a commercial transaction, which involved dealing with freezing injunctions obtained against the defendants and the co-ordination of actions in various jurisdictions.
These agencies investigate and file civil regulatory actions involving violations ranging from unregistered offerings to securities fraud.
During his 21 - year legal career, Mr. Goldberg has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts throughout the United States involving claims of retaliation, discrimination, wrongful termination, fraud, defamation, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract, as well as commercial contract disputes, civil RICO, ERISA, trade secrets and restrictive covenants, corporate governance disputes, minority shareholder disputes, partnership disputes, Madoff counseling and defense, advancement and indemnification proceedings, whistleblower actions (SOX and CEPA), executive compensation counseling, litigation, and arbitration, international litigation and arbitration, antitrust litigation and arbitration, products liability litigation, environmental and toxic tort litigation, and securities fraud.
Ms. Field has experience defending financial institutions in complex litigation, consumer class actions and litigation involving fraud claims, federal consumer credit laws, unfair business practices and other commercial matters.
Mr. Marx focuses on white collar criminal matters and regulatory enforcement actions, and has considerable experience with investigations and prosecutions involving healthcare fraud, securities fraud, commercial bribery, accounting improprieties, research misconduct, export violations, antitrust violations and conflicts - of - interest.
He has experience in a variety of litigation matters, including actions involving the fiduciary duties of directors, officers, and controlling stockholders, mergers and acquisitions litigation, securities fraud litigation and other corporate governance disputes.
Her experience includes both first - party and third - party insurance disputes involving claims for copyright infringement, misappropriation of likeness / right of publicity, trade disparagement, class action securities fraud, Department of Justice and grand jury investigations, actuarial malpractice, class action predatory lending, class action right - of - way / trespass, class action property and environmental damage, class action toxic tort, personal injury / class action mass tort, insurance broker - agent liability, and reinsurance.
Prior to joining Williams Montgomery & John, he practiced for four years at another Chicago - based civil litigation firm where he represented real property developers, motor vehicle dealers, lending companies, food manufacturers and family owned businesses as both plaintiff and defendant in commercial litigation matters involving breach of contract, fraud and disputes under the Uniform Commercial Code, and defended his clients in consumer class action litigation.
DEG - Deutsche Investitions («DEG») v Koshy and Gwembe Valley Development Co v Koshy and related actions Acted for a state - owned German bank in a long running dispute arising out of an investment in Zambia, involving originally insolvency issues and claims in fraud and for breach of director's fiduciary duties.
Mr. Moreno has acted as lead associate in complex securities fraud class actions under Section 10 (b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and has defended derivative claims involving California, Nevada, and Delaware corporations.
Paul has extensive experience in commercial fraud investigations and cases, and asset tracing actions, having been involved in some of the seminal «Mareva» or worldwide freezing order cases
Willie has prosecuted and defended claims involving breach of contract, tortious interference, state and federal antitrust, common law and statutory fraud, misappropriation of trade secrets, negligent misrepresentation, business disparagement, state and federal securities actions, product liability, nuisance, trespass, conversion, insurance coverage, corporate governance, breach of fiduciary duty, shareholder oppression, and qui tam.
He represents clients in federal actions involving conspiracy, bank fraud, aviation fraud, health care fraud, environmental crime, securities fraud, and tax fraud.
His business litigation work includes trying cases involving intellectual property disputes, breaches of contract and fiduciary duties, business torts, corporate espionage, defamation, whistleblowing and qui tam actions and securities fraud.
Representation of a life insurer faced with a nationwide class action involving claims of fraud and discrimination through alleged use of race - based underwriting practices.
On top of that, they should know the area of law that is involved in your class action (e.g. consumer fraud, contract law, drugs, etc.) and demonstrate a successful record handling similar cases.
Commercial Litigation — Lead attorney in international fraud and breach of contract action resolved in client's favor on summary judgment including recovery of all attorneys» fees; Served as first - chair defending a loan servicer in complex civil litigation involving declaratory judgment action and cross-claims for commercial torts; Second chair for seven day jury trial involving claims for indemnification and statutory business conspiracy; Won summary judgment as the lead counsel on behalf of a charitable trust in litigation over a commercial lease termination; Represented financial institutions in commercial tort actions; Represented finance company in AAA Arbitration.
I have prosecuted and defended adversary cases within the United States Bankruptcy Court for both debtors and creditors involving dischargeability actions and claims of fraud.
Defended multinational bank against securities fraud claim in case in which the court denied class action certification in decision involving the efficient market hypothesis and fraud on the market theory.
One of the cases presented to me at this moot was Kathryn Leah Smithen v. Law Society of Upper Canada, dealing with an applicant who «disclosed a criminal history of 38 or 39 convictions for fraud - related offences between 1979 and 1993, several outstanding civil judgments, two judgments entered against her in actions involving fraud, two terminations of employment for cause, and two declarations of bankruptcy.»
Whether your case involves allegations of the breach of a fiduciary duty, undue influence or fraud, our lawyers are ready to take whatever action is necessary to help you protect your assets.
Howell's practice focuses on the representation of clients in high - stakes government investigations and enforcement actions involving alleged securities and accounting fraud, healthcare billing and recordkeeping improprieties, bribery and corruption, and violations of the Civil False Claims Act.
The firm's Asia - based investigation team regularly represented clients operating in China in response to US government inquiries and enforcement actions involving allegations of bribery, money laundering, sanctions violations and financial fraud.
Arbitrated and mediated class actions involving consumer fraud, antitrust, health insurance, wage and hour, and employment discrimination issues
His representation of managed care clients focuses on significant commercial disputes involving provider fraud and abuse, class actions, drug coverage, insured class actions, and commercial contract disputes.
He has represented clients in a wide variety of commercial disputes, including claims involving securities fraud, breach of contract, class actions, partnership disputes, trade secrets, common law fraud, and commercial torts.
He focuses on complex commercial litigation, particularly contract actions, fraud, breach of fiduciary duties and other business torts, intra-company disputes and business divorce claims involving partnerships and LLCs, employment claims, and derivative and class action claims.
Defending leading international pharmaceutical companies in the defence of products liability and consumer fraud class actions involving various drugs and other products
Representation of a major corporation in an action involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud, and unfair trade practices in connection with a failed joint venture.
Representation of a major developer in an action involving allegations of breach of contract, fraud, and unfair trade practices in connection with a failed acquisition of an apartment building.
Phil's experience in consumer class action defense includes successfully defending Fortune 500 clients in nationwide and multistate class action litigation involving allegations of consumer fraud, false advertising and product defects.
Secured dismissal of federal class action complaint for financial services client involving allegations of unfair competition and fraud.
She also represents receivers in actions by the government to take over companies involving Ponzi schemes or fraud.
He has represented clients in matters involving partnership disputes, derivative actions, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, theft of trade secrets and real estate disputes and transactions.
Those class actions have involved a wide variety of subjects, including antitrust / unfair competition, consumer fraud, RICO, ERISA, employment discrimination, environmental issues, product - related matters and securities.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z