Sentences with phrase «fraud against appellants»

4 Mar. 28, 2018)(unpublished), respondents filed cross-claims for breach of contract, indemnity, and fraud against appellants, with respondents winning on their cross-claims except for the fraud claim to the extent of $ 1,311,772.

Not exact matches

Ilford Cellular v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 435 (TC) David Bedenham acted for HMRC in this appeal against a denial of input tax on the basis that the relevant taxable supply was connected with MTIC fraud and the Appellant should have known of that connection.

Ilford Cellular v HMRC [2013] UKFTT 435 (TC) VAT appeal against a denial of input tax on the basis that the relevant taxable supply was connected with MTIC fraud and the Appellant should have known of that connection.

While the first defence does not apply in this case, the motion judge accepted the respondent's evidence that he was innocent of any wrongdoing and unaware of the fraud perpetrated against the appellant.