In recent weeks, I've written posts about two new legal startups, LawTova and Text to Ticket, and described ties they appeared to have to another legal startup, QuickLegal, that shut down amid
fraud allegations concerning its founder Derek Bluford.
This development doesn't invalidate the questions I raise below about LawTova's connections to QuickLegal, another startup that shut down amid
fraud allegations concerning its owner.
Not exact matches
«I am sure that Members on both sides of the House are
concerned when they read of
allegations of electoral
fraud, including those alleged to have taken place at elections this year.
SERAP in a statement today by its deputy director Timothy Adewale said, «While we welcome the reported disclosure of
fraud and corruption in the SIP and the request to the EFCC to probe the
allegations, we are
concerned that sufficient details about the
allegations have not been disclosed.
The work and pensions secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, said in a statement that he had been so
concerned about the problems he had written to former Labour ministers — including Hodge — for permission to release papers from their time in office relating to the
fraud allegations.
But it is a big step from
concerns about a document to an
allegation tantamount to
fraud.
But as I looked into it, it appeared to have several people involved in its management and operations who were previously involved with the management and operations of the now - defunct startup QuickLegal, which closed its doors after this blog reported
allegations of
fraud and other misconduct
concerning its CEO.
Successfully defended application on behalf of the Lawyers» Professional Indemnity Company (LawPro) against judgement - creditor
concerning allegations of the improvident sale of real property,
fraud, negligence and conspiracy.
Investigations have
concerned allegations of: securities, accounting, tax and other
frauds; insider trading; corrupt payments; financial reporting and disclosure improprieties; noncompliance with professional and regulatory standards; environmental crimes; pretexting; anti-money laundering violations; and discriminatory conduct.
Recent examples of Jane's work include: acting for a British retail and commercial bank in a breach of contract dispute (with Andrew Hochhauser QC); acting for a professional association football club in a dispute
concerning breaches of fiduciary duty (with Paul McGrath QC); acting as sole Counsel for a pharmaceutical company in an injunction dispute against a senior employee (and successfully obtaining a garden leave injunction); and acting in a complex, multi-party dispute containing
allegations of
fraud (with Daniel Oudkerk QC).
Represented a national health care provider in a federal health care
fraud investigation
concerning allegations of overbilling and beneficiary inducement.
We regularly advise our clients
concerning new regulatory initiatives, ways to avoid and address
allegations of billing or insurance
fraud, and strategies to minimize and recover wrongful claim denials and underpayments.
He has advised both clubs and private individuals in relation to settlement agreements, stay applications, strike out applications, arbitration proceedings and FA disciplinary proceedings
concerning matters such as: agent fees, player transfers, contractual disputes and
allegations of
fraud and unlawful means conspiracy.
We have acted for individuals in internal investigations
concerning benchmark rates including LIBOR and EURIBOR, the
allegations of manipulation of the FX markets, as well as
allegations of corruption,
fraud, computer misuse, sanctions breaches and money laundering.
Signet — Representation of Signet in consolidated securities class action alleging securities
fraud concerning alleged «gem - swapping», sexual harassment
allegations that were raised in an employment arbitration, and purportedly lax credit standards.
Richard is on a small panel of counsel who are regularly instructed by Royal Mail Legal Services
concerning allegations of
fraud against Royal Mail and Post Office Limited, both by members of the public and employees.
The
allegations concerned a letter of credit
fraud committed against banks.
The trial court rejected the Broker's claims for lost commissions and also the Developer's
allegations concerning violations of the state's consumer
fraud act.