The jury also returned $ 40 million in punitive damages after finding that the bank's
fraudulent actions caused harm to the parties.
Not exact matches
Specifically, he asserted the following
causes of
action: «(1) counts one and two -
fraudulent concealment and fraud; (2) count three - civil conspiracy; (3) counts four and five - negligence; (4) count six - negligent misrepresentation; (5) counts seven and eight - negligent hiring and retention; and (6) count nine - wrongful death and survival.
Filing Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy does not discharge all debts including student loans, current tax obligations, debts from willful and malicious injuries to persons or property, debts for personal injuries
caused from the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, debts from
fraudulent actions, Debts that were not included in the bankruptcy schedules in time to allow creditors to file proofs of claim (unscheduled debts), and child support or spousal support.
Debts which are not eligible for discharge are listed under the Bankruptcy Code 11 U.S.C. § 523 and include
fraudulent Actions, student loans (unless payment will impose an «undue hardship» to such an extent that the debtor will not be able to maintain even a minimal living standard), child and spousal support, current tax obligations, and debts from willful and malicious injuries to persons or property or debts for personal injuries
caused from the debtor's operation of a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.
You may not use the Site to develop, generate, transmit or store information (including, without limitation, Content) that: (a) in the sole and absolute discretion of Undead Labs, is deemed to be offensive; (b) is deemed unlawful, harmful, harassing,
fraudulent, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, hateful, sexually explicit, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable, nor may you use a misspelling or an alternative spelling to circumvent these restrictions; (c) consists of advertisements, promotions, solicitations, chain letters, pyramid schemes, investment opportunities or other unsolicited commercial communication; (d) is derogatory or harmful to the reputation of the Site, Undead Labs, or our directors, officers and employees in any way; (e) encourages the violation of any local, state, national, or international laws or regulations; (f) solicits other users» passwords and / or credit card information; (g) is anti-social, disruptive, or destructive, including, without limitation, «flaming,» «spamming» and «trolling»; (h) carries out any
action with a disruptive effect, such as
causing forum screens to scroll faster than other users are able to read, or setting up macros with large amounts of text that, when used, can have a disruptive effect on the normal flow of forum postings; (i) contains any user's personal information, including, but not limited to, such user's real name, address, phone number or private e-mail address, except that a user may communicate his or her own personal information in a private message directed to a single user; (j) forges headers or otherwise manipulates identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any message (k) in any way obstructs or otherwise interferes with the normal performance of another person's use of the Site; (l) constitutes harassment or a violation of privacy or threatens other people or groups of people; (m) is harmful to children in any manner; or (n) constitutes phishing, pharming or impersonates any other person, or steals or assumes any person's identity (whether a real identity or online nickname or alias).
But, here, two of the Second Circuit's active judges ruled against Marblegate, the dissent was by a senior judge who can not vote on an en banc petition, and the Second Circuit has historically granted fewer en banc rehearings than any other circuit court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or
fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential
causes of
action but did not analyze.
The motion judge refused to stay Haas's
action, determining that the «pith and substance» of most of the claims advanced by Haas related to the
fraudulent misrepresentation of facts that
caused Haas to enter into the shareholders» agreement, and were not contractual claims.
Hayward represents an important clarification of the circumstances in which the
cause of
action in deceit will lie, and it is obvious that that tort is, today, being invoked with some regularity in response to
fraudulent personal injury claims (see, eg, Direct Line Group Plc v Akramzadeh (High Court, unreported, 15 June 2016) in which an insurer sued in deceit 29 persons who had fraudulently made claims arising out of motor vehicle accidents).
The
causes of
action included breach of contract,
fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unjust enrichment and breach of constructive trust.
This crypto exchange has decided to distribute brochures in order to prevent damage
caused by scams or other
fraudulent actions.
That is why, as Bob Aaron says, and as Barry Lebowe says, that there is far more trouble
caused by the negative fallout from SPIS driven deals involving misrepresentations, innocent, negligent or
fraudulent in nature, whether these
actions reach the in - court stage, or not, than the public, nay, many lawyers realize.
Stephens v. Sponholz (251 A.D. 2d 1061)- purchaser's
causes of
action against seller for fraud and negligent misrepresentation stand; the «as is» and general merger clauses of the purchase agreement are not specific disclaimers and do not preclude a
cause of
action based upon fraud in the inducement of the contract; issues of fact remain as to whether seller made express
fraudulent representations concerning water in the basement of the house or actively concealed the problem and whether purchaser could have discovered the defect by the exercise of reasonable diligence.
Marshall v. Gallinger Real Estate Co. (222 A.D. 2d 1101)-
fraudulent misrepresentation; fraud
cause of
action fails where purchaser (i) noticed defective condition upon first visit to property, (ii) hired an engineer to inspect the property, and (iii) where there was no active concealment of defect.