Sentences with phrase «fraudulent payments by»

Instructed in a case involving numerous allegations of fraudulent payments by a director to another company in which he was a shareholder

Not exact matches

To subvert employees who set up dummy corporations and then submit fraudulent bills, analyze all payments to new or unfamiliar suppliers by running Dun & Bradstreet credit checks or otherwise verifying each new company's authenticity.

The business may not become aware of the fraudulent requests until they are contacted by their vendors to follow up on the status of their invoice payment.

Imagine selling someone a US$ 3,000 watch online, only to see the transaction disputed by the issuing bank two weeks after the payment was made due to a fraudulent charge.

One of the counts reads: «That you Dr. Raymond Dokpesi and Daar Investment and Holding Company Limited between October 2014 and March 19, 2015 in Abuja, conducted procurement fraud by means of fraudulent and corrupt act, to wit: receipt of payment into the account of Daar Investment and Holding Company Limited with First Bank of Nigeria Plc of public funds in the sum of N2, 120,000,000 from the account of the office of National Security Adviser (NSA) with the Central Bank of Nigeria for the funding of media activities for the 2015 presidential election campaign for the People's Democratic Party (PDP) and you thereby committed an offence contrary to section 58 (4)(b) of the Public Procurement Act, 2007 and punishable under Section 58 (6) & (7) of the same Act».

«That you Mohammed Ahmed Katun while serving as an Assistant Director, Pension Department of the Office of Head of Service of the Federation on or about the 14th day of August, 2009 within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, obtained by false pretences and with intent to defraud various sums of money amounting in the aggregate to N24, 660,675.00 (Twenty Four Million, Six Hundred and Sixty Thousand, Six Hundred and Seventy Five Naira only) from the Federal Government of Nigeria through the Pension Account held by the Office of the Head of Service of the Federation of Nigeria through fraudulent payments described as collective allowances into your bank account maintained with Ecobank Nigeria Limited (former Oceanic International Bank Plc) and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 1 (1)(a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1 (3) of the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006.»

He, however, declared the payment of $ 1.092 billion in the Malabu oil deal into an escrow account at JP Morgan, London, by the former ministers as fraudulent, stressing that the money should have been paid into the Federation Account or the Consolidated Revenue Fund.

We do not reduce royalties by fees such as payment processing fees (by PayPal e.g.), retailer discounts, costs due to erroneous or fraudulent transactions or credit card charge - backs.

We do not reduce royalties by fees or costs such as payment processing fees (by PayPal e.g.), retailer discounts, costs due to erroneous or fraudulent transactions or credit card charge - backs.

While the higher minimum payment Chase probably can justify since the balance transfer offer didn't specify it would be different than the card's overall terms (although if they aren't applying it uniform to all cardholders, that could be a problem for them), changing the interest rate on the promotional offer by imposing this new «service fee» on exactly the same accounts still benefiting from such an offer is outright fraudulent if you ask me.

Eligible taxi travel includes GST, toll and all other costs included in the fare, but excludes cancellation fees, payments that are reversed or refunded, booked trips that are not completed, payments which are suspected or deemed by ingogo to be fraudulent and any amount for which you have been provided with credit by ingogo or which has been subsidised by ingogo in any way (in whole or in part).

Many STT readers will be aware that both the Australian government (where are you Greg Hunt) and the Clean Energy Regulator have been conspicuously silent amid allegations of fraudulent payments running to hundreds of millions of dollars relating to RECs — aka Large - scale Generation Certificates (LGCs)-- created by non-compliant wind factories such as Waubra, -LSB-...]

Acting in a dispute between banker and an English plc customer over responsibility for losses from fraudulent payments brought about by a «vishing» scam.

Appeared in Uzinterimpex v Standard Bank [2008] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 456, a major Court of Appeal case involving allegations of a fraudulent call by a London bank on an advance payment guarantee, constructive trust and conversion.

We have represented clients in grand jury investigations regarding, among other things, possible fraud by employees who have manipulated the books and records of their employer, trustees who have misstated the assets of trusts, government contractors who have submitted claims for payment based on fraudulent accounting, and auto dealers who have falsely reported inventory.

By: Jassmine Girgis PDF Version: BIA Preference Payments: Evidence Rebutting the Presumption must be Objectively Reasonable Case Commented On: Gustafson (Re), 2018 ABQB 77 (CanLII) Introduction Legislation that governs fraudulent preferences applies if a debtor elects to pay only one or... Continue reading →

The NPRM would have allowed covered entities on their own initiative to disclose to law enforcement officials protected health information that the covered entity believed in good faith constituted evidence of criminal conduct that arose out of and was directly related to: (A) The receipt of health care or payment for health care, including a fraudulent claim for health care; (B) qualification for or receipt of benefits, payments, or services based on a fraudulent statement or material misrepresentation of the health of the individual; that occurred on the covered entity's premises or was witnessed by a member of the covered entity's workforce.

Piikani Energy Corp. (Bankrupt), Re 2013 ABCA 293 Bankruptcy — Setting aside transactions prior to bankruptcy — Fraudulent preferences — What constitutes a non-arm's length transaction A bankruptcy trustee applied to set aside pre-bankruptcy payments made by a corporate bankrupt to two individuals, L and M, as being fraudulent preferences (Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIAFraudulent preferences — What constitutes a non-arm's length transaction A bankruptcy trustee applied to set aside pre-bankruptcy payments made by a corporate bankrupt to two individuals, L and M, as being fraudulent preferences (Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIAfraudulent preferences (Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), s. 95).

Two were family law cases, one involving an attack on fraudulent conveyances perpetrated by a husband who owed support and equalization payments.

Earlier this year, the British government published an official report revealing the potential of blockchain technology to save millions of pounds by preventing fraudulent welfare payments.

Conducted a review and audit of numerous pay documents, travel vouchers, and invoices to identify doubtful and improper payments initiated recovery by collections of fraudulent payments.

214 DOS 97 Matter of DOS v. Laymon - accounting to client; bad check; deposits; failure to pay judgments; proper business practices; jurisdiction; DOS retains jurisdiction after expiration of license (for failure to pay renewal fee) where acts occurred during licensure; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.1 by depositing clients» funds into operating account and failing to maintain special bank account; violation of 19 NYCRR 175.2 for failing to account to client; broker engaged in fraudulent practices by accepting monies he was required to retain in escrow, depositing said monies into his operating account, failing to return same to its rightful owner and by purporting to make refunds by issuing bad checks; in light of broker's financial inability to do so, failure to promptly satisfy judgments was not a demonstration of untrustworthiness; there was no violation of 19 NYCRR 175.3 (b) where broker was not managing rental properties; real estate broker's license revoked; reapplication for broker's license conditioned upon proof of payment of restitution with interest and proof of satisfaction of judgment with interest

107 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Sosis - subject matter jurisdiction; due process; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; deposits; fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction if at the time the disciplinary proceeding was commenced by proper service of a notice of hearing and complaint the party was (i) licensed to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (ii) an applicant for either a license or for the renewal of a license to engage in regulated real estate activities, or (iii) eligible to automatically renew the prior license under the two - year limitation provision of RPL § 441 (2); ex parte hearing is permissible upon proof of proper notice of hearing; DOS has subject matter jurisdiction where party was licensed at the time proceeding was commenced and, where at time of hearing, although not licensed was eligible to automatically apply to renew pursuant to RPL § 441 (2); licensee operated a real estate brokerage business under an unlicensed name; licensee unlawfully retains deposit funds after deposit monies were delivered on the condition that same were to be disbursed only on the principal's consent and approval and said consent and approval was not given; licensee's illegal exercise of right of ownership over his principal's funds spawns conversion and constitutes a fraudulent practice; DOS fails its burden of proof to establish licensee failed to deposit trust funds in a segregated escrow account, engaged in fraud and changed business location without notice to DOS; restitution ordered in the amount of $ 1,900 plus interest, fine of $ 1,000 and any further application for licensure shall not be considered until applicant pays said fine and provides proof of payment of restitution

1 DOS 98 Matter of DOS v. Fiumera - proper business practices; broker licensed in her individual name violates RPL § 440 - a when not also licensed as an associate broker while working under the name and auspices of another broker; broker not required to disgorge commission where individually licensed and additional associate broker's license would be issued pro forma upon payment of licensing fee; broker did not engage in fraudulent practice when advised homeowner that radon report was acceptable when reasonably acted upon advice given to her by the party taking the test; broker's offer to pay for remedial work indicates a good faith offer of settlement; $ 250 fine

79 DOS 99 Matter of DOS v. Pagano - disclosure of agency relationships; failure to appear at hearing; proper business practices; unauthorized practice of law; unearned commissions; vicarious liability; fraudulent practice; jurisdiction; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof of proper service; DOS has jurisdiction after expiration of respondents» licenses as acts of misconduct occurred and the proceedings were commenced while the respondents were licensed; licensee fails to timely provide seller client with agency disclosure form prior to entering into listing agreement and fails to timely provide agency disclosure form to buyer upon first substantive contact; broker fails to make it clear for which party he is acting; broker violates 19 NYCRR 175.24 by using exclusive right to sell listing agreement without mandatory definitions of «exclusive right to sell» and «exclusive agency»; broker breaches fiduciary duties to seller clients by misleading them as to buyer's ability to financially consummate the transaction; broker breaches his fiduciary duty to seller by referring seller to the attorney who represented the buyers when he knew or should have known such attorney could not properly protect seller's interests; improper for broker to use listing agreements providing for broker to retain one half of any deposit if forfeited by buyer as such forfeiture clause could, by its terms, allow broker to retain part of the deposit when broker did not earn a commission; broker must conduct business under name as it appears on license; broker engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in preparing contracts for purchase and sale of real estate which did not contain a clause making it subject to the approval of the parties» attorneys and were not a form recommended by a joint bar / real estate board committee; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using sales contract which purported to change the terms of the listing agreement to include a higher commission; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness and incompetency in using contracts of sale which were unclear, ambiguous, vague and incomplete; broker failed to amend purchase agreement to reflect amendment to increase deposit amount; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in back - dating purchase agreements; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness in participating in scheme to have seller hold undisclosed second mortgage and to mislead first mortgagee about the purchaser's financial ability to purchase; broker demonstrated untrustworthiness by claiming unearned commission and filing affidavit of entitlement for unearned commission; DOS fails to establish by substantial evidence that respondent acted as undisclosed dual agent; corporate broker bound by the knowledge acquired by and is responsible for acts committed by its licensees within the actual or apparent scope of their authority; corporate and individual brokers» licenses revoked, no action taken on application for renewal until proof of payment of sum of $ 2,000.00 plus interests for deposits unlawfully retained