Sentences with phrase «fraudulent science by»

Not exact matches

«We became interested in the plight of people whose career trajectories were derailed because of someone else's unethical behavior — these were people who did nothing wrong themselves but suffered reputational damage merely by being associated with a fraudulent employer or company,» says Takuya Sawaoka of Stanford University, who published a paper today on the «moral spillover» effect in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

The most important work it is based on, that by the Skeptical Science group, is fraudulent with the authors having intentionally misrepresented their results.

Having read some of Mr Keenan's investigations and his postulations on aspects of climate science, I would suggest he is an astute detective who has exposed fraudulent scientific practices by a few climate scientists.

And fraudulent «studies» bought by the fossil fuel industries to dispute the reality of the temperature record are not science.

The New American has published many stories over the years debunking the claim that there is a «consensus of science» on man - made global warming, particularly exposing the flawed and fraudulent studies by Naomi Oreskes and John Cook that have been cited innumerable times to manufacture the «97 percent of scientists agree» myth.

The IPCC is continuing its tradition of fraudulent bogus climate science for the 2013 climate report by utilizing Climategate - style scientists that excel in global warming fabrication and suppressing research that challenges the blatant fabrication.

But the true climate change deniers first had their way, doing what is unforgiveable (or even fraudulent) in real science, by retrospectively changing old data until it served their ends, by portraying the Earth as a place of Gaian perfection with only modest diversions from the supposed «average» temperature.

Even if, for the sake of argument, all science conducted by the CRU was fraudulent, our understanding of global warming would not change.

CAGW is a farce of gigantic proportions, perpetrated by incompetant and / or fraudulent science and I have firm and specific reasons for saying that.

The mechanisms such interests use are many — influencing election outcomes by injecting huge sums of money into them (see the NYT editorial on the KOch Brothers and AB32, for example), installing fossil fuel employees in government bureaucracies (BP's ex-chief scientist is currently Head of Science at the DOE, one Steve Koonin, also of Caltech — welcome to the fossil fuel - academic complex), and distorting science to fit their agenda (witness the endless fraudulent claims about zero - emission combustion, despite the persistent absence of any stand - alone protoScience at the DOE, one Steve Koonin, also of Caltech — welcome to the fossil fuel - academic complex), and distorting science to fit their agenda (witness the endless fraudulent claims about zero - emission combustion, despite the persistent absence of any stand - alone protoscience to fit their agenda (witness the endless fraudulent claims about zero - emission combustion, despite the persistent absence of any stand - alone prototypes.)