Not exact matches
Emirates Skywards reserves the right in its sole discretion not to link a Member's Account or to credit a Member's Account
under this clause 15.4 or to cancel Miles already credited to a Member's Account
under a Tipping Offer, where Emirates has reason to believe that the identity of the Member does not match the identity of the transferor or where there has been any
fraudulent activity connected with the
transfer or conversion in relation to the Member's Account.
or allow to Run Compensation Suit Simultaneously with suits file by Bank Officials
under ARTHA RIN ACT with equal opportunity and equal right so as to restore total accountability, which will be similar to DRT (Debt Recovery Tribunal of INDIA)(B)- Considering the Heavy loss and Damages of Government Registered and Identified SICK INDUSTRIES of 1992 & 1996 of Private Sector due to Negligence, Violation of Contract & Non-Banking Activities etc. of Bank Officials and Policy Maker & need 100 % Weaver of all type of Bank loan liabilities to minimize their heavy loss and damages to certain extent
under LIMITATION ACT (C)- The system of keeping mortgage of Land & Properties from the Owner of Industries by Bank or any Loan Giving Agencies as Securities are mostly responsible for Malpractices and ever growing Corruption, &
Fraudulent Activities in Banking Sector, which are now proven matter and may kindly be completely abolished as a part of reform programs at earliest possible time to ESTABLISH ACCOUNTABILITY and Check Malpractices,
Fraudulent Activities which are now growing by large in Banking Sector or in other Loan Giving Agencies upto root Levels (D)-- All suits of Artha Rin Court may kindly be
transferred to Civil Commercial Court abolishing SECTIONS 12, 12 (khan) 18 (2) & (3) 19, 20, 21, 34,40, 41, 42, 44, 47 and 50 of ARTHA RIN ACT -2003 for the end of Justice.
The commissioner hearing the case found that the change to the premarital agreement was a
fraudulent conveyance under the Uniform Fraudulent Tra
fraudulent conveyance
under the Uniform
Fraudulent Tra
Fraudulent Transfer Act.
Therefore, the Court found that Husband's and Wife's attempt to
transfer Husband's separate property to the community by revising their marital property agreement was a
fraudulent conveyance
under the law.
The Court noted that,
under the
fraudulent conveyance law, a
transfer is
fraudulent if it is made in order to hinder or defraud a creditor.
We then took steps to amend the Statement of Claim to allege that the conveyance was void
under section 2 of the
Fraudulent Conveyances Act and that the Plaintiff was entitled to punitive damages for the defendant's attempt to fraudulently
transfer his assets to avoid judgment.
In the process, Justice Ikola, writing for a 3 - 0 panel of our local Court of Appeal, faced some interesting legal issues relating to fee entitlement
under the Uniform
Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA) or the «tort of another» doctrine.