Not exact matches
«Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his
faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers
of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that
act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall
of separation between Church & State.»
Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that
faith involves a
free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments
of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps
of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs
of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result
faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a justreason for changing or doubting that same
faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).
Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that
faith involves a
free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments
of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps
of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs
of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result
faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a just reason for changing or doubting that same
faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).
The
Free Churches assume baptism would be a mere symbolic
act, which follows conversion and a public confession
of the new
faith, aslo an
act of obedience.
If all men had kept
faith with each other from the first
act of free loyalty onwards, and if men in their freedom had always trusted God as the sparrows trust him in their lack
of freedom, then Jesus Christ might have been welcomed as the perfecter
of faith, its universalizer and guarantor.
If Christianity continues to tell you that WHEN you get your
act together — God will finally open his arms, the representatives
of this
faith are not understanding the premier principal
of God — through Christ he loves you NOW — but when his love begins to radiate into your personal life - your very personal life - you will make choices reflecting that reality — all other things, people, dogmas, Biblical interpretations — all
of that through the long centuries
of man — will be a drop in His eternal ocean and in that first eternal moment — won't matter - your needs now matter — Christ addresses need — with Himself — demands — with parabolic events — and refusal — with the end result
of free will — even the will to reject Him — when He would have done anything for you to not be rejected.
And then there were bishops like Karol Wojtyła
of Kraków, who grasped that the dignity
of the human person was the battleground on which «the Church in the modern world» was contesting with various dangerous forces for the human future; who thought that coercion
of consciences violated that human dignity; and who believed that the
act of faith must be
free if it is to be true, because the God
of the Bible wants to be adored by people who freely choose to do so.
All are
free to believe - or not believe -, all are
free to practice a
faith or not, and those who believe are
free, and should be
free, to speak
of and
act on their belief.»
Faith must be an
act of free will, or it can't be valid.
«Believing... that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his
faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers
of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that
act of the whole American people which declared that their Legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall
of separation between Church and State.»
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his
faith or his worship, that the legislative powers
of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that
act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should «make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof,» thus building a wall
of separation between church and State.
a)-- now requires «
faith»
Free Schools to conform to schedule 19 paragraph 4
of the Schools Standards and Framework
Act, which means that parents
of pupils at these schools can request to that their children be taught the locally agreed RE syllabus, instead
of a confessional syllabus, as is the case for parents
of pupils at VA schools — another welcome change.
Fear
Free will disclose your personal information, without notice, only if required to do so by law or in the good
faith belief that such action is necessary to: (a) conform to the edicts
of the law or comply with legal process served on Fear
Free or the site; (b) protect and defend the rights or property
of Fear
Free; and, (c)
act under exigent circumstances to protect the personal safety
of users
of Fear
Free, or the public.
The
Act recognizes that officials
of religious groups are
free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with the religious views
of their respective
faiths.
Courts must consider whether a reasonable person in the employee's circumstances would believe the employer to be
acting in good
faith to protect a legitimate business interest or whether that reasonable person would believe that the employer was expressing an intention to break
free of the employment agreement.
Contact us today for a
free consultation and see how we can help you hold your insurance company liable for their
acts of bad
faith.
With respect to the strip search and the car seizure, the trial judge held that, although the Province and the City did not
act in bad
faith and were not liable in tort for either incident, the Province's strip search and the City's vehicle seizure violated W's right to be
free from unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8
of the Charter.
This means that while the insurance company and its attorneys are generally
free to settle a lawsuit or go to trial at their own discretion without the input
of the actual defendant named in the lawsuit, they also must
act in good
faith and consider their insured's interests when making any decision.
The group
of representatives was reacting to a story which appeared in The Australian on Tuesday speculating that the Federal government proposes to remove the words «offend, insult, humiliate» from section 18C, as well as removing the requirement that a defendant must have
acted «reasonably and in good
faith» in order to be covered by the
free speech defences available under section 18D.
Noer - Pennington is a doctrine that allows parties to work together
free of antitrust scrutiny to create laws, regulation, or collaborate on litigation, even if this would create a restraint or monopoly, so long as the parties are
acting in good
faith and not taking the actions merely to interfere with the business
of another.