The school is 99 % African - American and 99 %
free and reduced lunch which has yet to be a hindrance to our students» success.
Not exact matches
The Yankton School District participates in the National School
Lunch Program sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)
which permits the school system to offer
free and reduced priced meals to students who qualify.
It's worth noting that these complaints tend to come from parents at schools in
which the
free /
reduced lunch population is low — most of these children are eating breakfast at home anyway,
and the inconveniences
and lost instructional time seem to outweigh any benefits of the program.
The Parsippany Hills, NJ high school mentioned in the Times report, at
which school food is being boycotted, has about 1,100 kids, 5 % of whom — or 60 students — qualify for
free and reduced lunch.
She found, for example, that the Kansas high school
which produced the widely - viewed «We Are Hungry» video has only 83 students, 29 of whom qualify for
free and reduced lunch.
Of course, I think there's also a larger issue at play here —
which is that society shouldn't stigmatize those who can't afford breakfast or
lunch at school
and students certainly shouldn't make fun of those purchasing
free or
reduced lunches.
Todd Drafall, the district's business manager, said the schools are open to providing healthy food options but are limited by finances,
which were further strained by a slight increase in the past few years of students qualifying for
free and reduced - cost
lunches.
This is certainly the intent of the National School
Lunch and Breakfast programs,
which offer
free and reduced meals to children, based on their families» income, as well as full - price meals to any student.
Phillips oversees the Norfolk Public Schools» nutrition department in Virginia,
which has about 63 %
free and reduced price
lunches.
At my younger child's elementary,
which has quite a few kids who qualify for
free and reduced lunch, the kids who don't qualify for the program are much more likely to bring a
lunch from home.
By doing away with a la carte snacks,
which had become the emblem of «I have money»,
and instead offering a variety of full meals (all of them covered under the
free /
reduced lunch program), we have achieved the ability to offer older students a wider variety of choices at lunchtime but also a fully equitable program, where literally there is no way to tell anymore who bought their meal
and who is eating
free.
The program,
which began in three schools last year, now operates in 11 elementary schools around the city
and in Cicero, where the population of students eligible for
free or
reduced lunches is 85 percent or higher.
Sal Valenza of the West New York School District in New Jersey,
which also serves primarily Latino students who overwhelmingly receive
free and reduced lunch, has also had positive feedback from the students
and administrators,
and says changes to nutritional standards nationwide could have a big impact.
The USDA,
which manages the NSLP, could not provide specific information about districts participating leaving program, but most that have come out publicly about dropping the program have predominantly white populations of students
and have a very low percentage of students receiving
free or
reduced - price
lunches.
The school also has a record number of students qualifying for
free and reduced lunches,
which is a sign that many families are struggling financially
and likely opting for cheaper, less healthy choices, she said.
As the New York Times article discusses more fully, the impetus for the price increase was a finding by the Center on Budget
and Policy Priorities, a research organization in Washington, that by keeping the price of the full meal too low, the paid meals were effectively being subsidized by the federal dollars
which are supposed to be allocated to the meals provided to kids who are on
free /
reduced lunch.
Eligible high schools are those in
which 50 percent or more of the students are eligible to participate in the federal
free and reduced - price
lunch program.
Frankenberg evaluated data from the National Center for Education Statistics» Common Core of Data from 2006 to 2013,
which provides annual school - level information about student's race
and ethnicity, as well as
free -
and reduced -
lunch data.
• Map performance on all of these measures against
free and reduced - price
lunch eligibility rates to determine
which schools are truly excelling at educating low - income students
and which schools are simply coasting along with an advantaged student body.
The survey sought to identify issues
and successful practices in «inclusive» STEM schools — schools that serve students from groups historically under - represented in STEM fields
and with a higher percentage of students who qualify for a
free or
reduced - price
lunch (
which is linked to family income)-- as opposed to «selective» STEM schools,
which recruit students who have higher levels of prior achievement.
Test scores among students of all racial
and ethnic backgrounds are higher in Texas than in Wisconsin, for example,
which has fewer students qualifying for
free -
and reduced - price
lunch.
These results add to evidence that boosting student achievement has few simple fixes — particularly in a school district like Houston, in
which 88 percent of students are black or Hispanic, about 30 percent have limited English proficiency,
and about 80 percent are eligible for
free or
reduced - price
lunch.
Test scores among kids of all racial
and ethnic backgrounds are higher in Texas than in Wisconsin, for example,
which has fewer students qualifying for
free -
and reduced - price
lunch.
Scholarship recipients in Florida must earn less than 185 % of the federal poverty line,
which is the income threshold for the federal government's
free and reduced lunch program.
Despite the model, the polished floors, new banners,
and students outfitted in spiffy olive
and khaki uniforms, the staff at Howland was quickly overwhelmed by the outsized needs of its student population,
which was 100 percent African American
and 98 percent eligible for
free or
reduced - price
lunch.
About one - third of charter school students were eligible for
free and reduced price
lunch,
which is about the same proportion as in all public schools.
The district is high poverty — more than 90 percent of students are on
free and reduced - price
lunch —
and culturally
and linguistically diverse,
which has sometimes created obstacles when trying to get parents more involved, Crater explains.
Columns (4)
and (9) report 2SLS estimates from specifications that add demographic controls,
which include dummies for female, black, Hispanic, Asian, other race, special education, limited English proficiency,
free /
reduced price
lunch,
and a female * minority interaction.
In their unpublished research,
which is now being peer - reviewed, Waddington
and Berends studied the standardized test scores of low - income, public school students (grades 3 - 8) who qualified for
free or
reduced - price
lunch and who used a voucher to switch to a private school.
Her suburban school,
which reported about 74 percent of its students on
free and reduced lunch last year, earned a school performance grade of «F» in 2014 - 2015
and experienced soaring teacher turnover of more than 26 percent.
Thirty - three percent of suburban kids —
and three out of every five black
and Latino kids in suburbia — attend schools where more than half their peers are on
free and reduced lunch (
which essentially means that there is at least a one - in - two chance that they are poor themselves).
We are a high - poverty, minority - majority school in
which 80 percent of our students qualify for
free or
reduced - price
lunch and 35 percent are English learners.
Bambrick - Santoyo credits his method with creating successful 90/90/90 schools (
which means 90 %
free or
reduced - price
lunch, 90 % students of color
and 90 % proficiency).
Districts will verify their number of low - income students once every our years,
which aligns with the requirements or federal
free and reduced lunch qualification.
In the face of so many challenges
and obstacles — designing new curricula aligned with Common Core, teaching a large population of English language learners
and grappling with the reality that 75 percent of their students qualify for
free or
reduced price
lunch — Burton's teachers wanted a protected, regular time slot to come together, look at data
and figure out
which of their teaching methods worked
and which ones didn't so they could bring their students along on a path toward success.
The Cabarrus County district,
which includes Concord, N.C., has 39 schools
and 30,000 students, 43 percent of whom are eligible for
free or
reduced - price
lunch.
So the 5,000 - student district —
which is 49 percent Hispanic
and 44 percent white, with about 25 percent qualifying for
free or
reduced - price
lunch — decided to radically alter its high school.
These last two were key factors for the kids who attended the pilot, 86 % of
which qualify for
free or
reduced - price
lunch, since transportation access
and food security are economic barriers to school choice for families who have lower household incomes.
In support of this goal, CEL staff
and consultants have provided job - embedded training, modeling instructional strategies
and coaching teachers within the context of their schools
and their classrooms It's happening, for example, in Vernon Parish at West Leesville Elementary,
which houses grades two through four, with 70 % of students qualifying for
Free and Reduced Lunch.
The program would provide $ 1,000 for each «gifted
and talented» student who is already eligible for
free or
reduced - price school
lunches,
which means the household's annual income is at or below $ 45,510 annually for a family of four.
Also, if you read one stat from the WR article, a significant gap was
free and reduced lunch,
which isn't all minorities
and is a reflection of poverty not race alone.
For example, a 2010 New York state charter school law requiring charter schools to mimic the demographics of the surrounding neighborhood — implemented to address gaps in English language learner
and special education enrollment at charter schools — might mean, if enforced, that a school in upper Manhattan's District 6 would need to enroll a student population in
which 98 percent are eligible for
free or
reduced - price
lunch, a commonly used measure of low - income status.64
The program has a 10 percent window of families that must pay a monthly tuition fee, because they don't meet the eligibility requirements —
which, as in Dallas ISD's program, stipulate eligible four year - olds must have limited English proficiency, qualify for
free or
reduced lunch, be homeless or in foster care,
and / or have a parent active in the military, as Breitbart Texas reported.
Special - education students
and those who are eligible for
free - or -
reduced - price
lunch qualify for differentiated aid,
which helps districts cover additional expenses associated with those students.
We meet Principal Garcia of P.S. 65, a low - performing school in
which 99 percent of students receive
free or
reduced - priced
lunch and the majority are from immigrant families.
Cross-referencing those schools with the
Free and Reduced Lunch data (
which is often used as an indicator of low income status), we can see that the schools that qualify have significantly fewer socioeconomically disadvantaged students.
For a district qualifying under this paragraph whose charter school tuition payments exceed 9 per cent of the school district's net school spending, the board shall only approve an application for the establishment of a commonwealth charter school if an applicant, or a provider with
which an applicant proposes to contract, has a record of operating at least 1 school or similar program that demonstrates academic success
and organizational viability
and serves student populations similar to those the proposed school seeks to serve, from the following categories of students, those: (i) eligible for
free lunch; (ii) eligible for
reduced price
lunch; (iii) that require special education; (iv) limited English - proficient of similar language proficiency level as measured by the Massachusetts English Proficiency Assessment examination; (v) sub-proficient,
which shall mean students who have scored in the «needs improvement», «warning» or «failing» categories on the mathematics or English language arts exams of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System for 2 of the past 3 years or as defined by the department using a similar measurement; (vi) who are designated as at risk of dropping out of school based on predictors determined by the department; (vii) who have dropped out of school; or (viii) other at - risk students who should be targeted to eliminate achievement gaps among different groups of students.
Over half of the 2013 honorees serve a student body more than 40 percent of
which is eligible for
free and reduced price
lunch.
We use panel data in Washington State to study the extent to
which teacher assignments between fourth
and eighth grade explain gaps between advantaged
and disadvantaged students — as defined by underrepresented minority status (URM)
and eligibility for
free or
reduced price
lunch (FRL)-- in their eighth grade math test scores
and high school course taking.
We find schools that are hyper - segregated by race;
and we find schools that do not reflect the cultural
and economic profile of the communities in
which they are situated (for as Ms Lecker reports charter schools underserve English language learners
and they often underserve the most economically disadvantaged children, as measured by eligibility for
free and reduced lunches).