Not exact matches
While I feel bad that there is a divide, I do not believe that the answer to put the tator tots back on the
free and reduced lunch program.
While it said there was «unclear» evidence that
free school
lunches raised attainment, it pointed to its own research on
free school breakfasts in disadvantaged schools delivering similar academic benefits to
free school
lunches, but «significantly improved» behaviour
and concentration,
and reduced absences.
«The key finding is that
while students prefer less - healthy school
lunch options, income constraints, particularly for those students receiving
free and reduced - price meals, cause these students to continue participating in the school
lunch program
and, hence, these students consume healthier meals,» Kropp said.
While the district was also beginning to see a greater range in terms of students» socioeconomic status, at the time of the initial course implementation, the district's rate of
free and reduced lunch was approximately 10 - 12 percent.
Specifically, we calculate growth for schools based on math scores
while taking into account students» prior performance in both math
and communication arts; characteristics that include race, gender,
free or
reduced - price
lunch eligibility (FRL), English - language - learner status, special education status, mobility status,
and grade level;
and school - wide averages of these student characteristics.
The students in Edison schools are disproportionately needy or of minority background; 65 percent are eligible for federal
free or
reduced - price
lunches,
while 55 percent are black
and 17 percent are Hispanic or Latino.
Moreover, they do so
while operating with similarly high percentages of students eligible for
free /
reduced lunch, similarly high student mobility rates, similar curriculum frameworks,
and similar per - pupil expenditures.2
«
While just 22 percent of students in Cumberland
and 29 percent of students Lincoln receive
free or
reduced - price
lunch, 86 percent in Central Falls
and 75 percent in Pawtucket do so.
All of this has been done
while the school, in the current economic climate, saw a 300 % rise in their numbers of
free and reduced lunch.
Given the facts that student needs are rising — poverty rates across Wisconsin have been rapidly increasing, with about 40 percent of schoolchildren now eligible for
free or
reduced lunch —
while financial support for schools at both the state
and federal level is falling, they have a tall order in front of them.
While about 40 percent of Wiseburn students come from families with incomes low enough to qualify them for
free and reduced - price
lunch, in one important way, Wiseburn is a wealthy district.
And while urban schools report the highest rates of low - income students (60 percent), even in the nation's suburban schools 40 percent of students are eligible for
free or
reduced - price
lunch.
While just 22 % of students in Cumberland
and 29 % of students Lincoln receive
free or
reduced - price
lunch, 86 % in Central Falls
and 75 % in Pawtucket do so.
In 2010, the percentage of students receiving
free and reduced lunch climbed above 50 percent in the Metropolitan School District of Lawrence Township,
while the percentage of students of color grew to 60 percent.
Local districts would continue to provide transportation
and food, including
free or
reduced lunches, to lab school students,
while also redirecting state
and local per - pupil dollars to the school's university leadership.
While there was initially some difficulty finding data on demographics
and free or
reduced -
lunch, data was eventually retrieved from the National Center for Education Statistics.