Sentences with phrase «free by your argument»

So all medications should be free by your argument.

Not exact matches

Byron Fitzgerald, Manager of the Litigation Section of the CBSA would later characterize the argument made by Finance and the Conservative Party that iPods could come into the country tariff free under 9948 using end use certificates is «perpetuating a fraud»:

The argument is the same in places such as India as it is in North America: that Facebook, a giant, rich corporation, is skewing the equality of the Internet in its favour by giving users some parts of it for free while the rest remains «for pay.»

Trump appeared to undermine the U.S. national security argument on Monday by tweeting that the tariffs would «come off» Mexico and Canada if they agreed a «fair» new deal in talks on the future of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

While I truly want to be with you on the hands - off - free - market argument, I just have to believe that these rules are in place for good reasons... like making sure your sweet Granny don't get fleeced by a huckster.

The emigration - fueled growth of religious pluralism and internal religious splits found in practically all of the colonies» combined with the principled arguments leading toward religious liberty put forth by William Penn, Roger Williams, and later Thomas Jefferson and James Madison» led, in meandering and often inadvertent fashion, to the principles of «no establishment» and «free exercise» of religion embodied in the First Amendment.

Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that faith involves a free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a justreason for changing or doubting that same faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).

Slave labor, he believed, was unfair competition to «free labor,» and that argument was carried forward by Abraham, who was a free labor advocate throughout his years as a Whig and, later, as a Republican.

Faithful to it, Vatican I recognised that faith involves a free act which can not «be produced necessarily by arguments of human reason» (DS 3035, 3010); hence the Council added to those external signs the «internal helps of the Holy Spirit» so that the former might be «most certain signs of divine revelation adapted to every intelligence» (DS 3009f, 3033f); as a result faith relies on «a most firm foundation» and «none can ever have a just reason for changing or doubting that same faith» (DS 3014, 3036; 2119 - 2121).

The free will argument is a lame tactic used by apologists in an attempt to address the problem of evil.

No man [should] be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor [should he] be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor... otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief... All men [should] be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and... the same [should] in no wise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities.

We have read the free exercise claims and arguments put forward by the prochoice lawyers in the current wave of litigation, and in our judgment, these claims would not be meritorious under even the most generous interpretation of free exercise rights under RFRA.

First, the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights has been making free exercise arguments for abortion for twenty years, and these claims were routinely rejected even by pro-choice courts, even before Smith.

If somebody votes for a party that you don't agree with, you're free to argue about it as much as you like; everybody will have an argument but nobody feels aggrieved by it.

Under the authority of God's free Word, she contends — her work retains some Barthian glosses — Christian identity is constituted «by a community of argument concerning the meaning of true discipleship.»

i am sorry J.W but i don't believe there is a god of any kind... if there was a god, why would such a so called all powerful being allow for the treatment of its creation by its creation... the argument of free will is an old and tired one... if the existence was true and the laws put in place to honor such a creature were equally upheld by god then i would have been punished a long long time ago and so would have the majority of people... believer or not!

It's just not true, the argument goes, that it makes any sense to say that we're free and self - centered individuals by nature.

Full debate requires that the argument stretch to the ultimate ideal by which all activities of the state ought to be informed, and this means that citizens should be free to advance and defend any religion they find convincing.

(After being in a few porn shops, I find it very difficult to believe the argument put forth by some that porn frees people from hang - ups.)

So these «internal» arguments against free will theism are purely ad hominem, drawing upon ethical views that free will theists are thought to accept but which need not be shared by the process theist making the argument.

Judas Iscariot and the Myth of Jewish Evil by Hyam Maccoby Free Press, 213 pages, $ 22.95 Maccoby is noted, or notorious, for his argument, made here once again, that anti-Semitism is inherent in Christian faith.

St Thomas Aquinas wades into the argument by afrming that «divine causality alone can move man's will from within, yet leave it free» (I - II q. 9 a. 6).

In a statement quoted by Hasker in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74).

On the far side of the older argument over the compatibility of Catholicism and democracy, this book seeks to convince us that the principles and practices of the free society are made necessary by Catholic teaching.

«Be it therefore enacted by the General Assembly, that no man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship place or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but that all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or afflict these civil capacities.»

Small touches elsewhere build up to improve the experience delivered by PES 2016, such as more realistic crowds, new replay cut - scenes (including frighteningly lifelike arguments with referees) and free - kick spray.

In separate memos, Bharara's prosecutors blasted arguments by former state Senator Skelos and ex-Assembly speaker Silver that their convictions will be tossed — thanks to ex-Virginia gover Bob McDonnell — and therefore they should remain free on bail as they seek appeal.

The absence of the information about house movements on the back of the bedroom tax — called a «spare room subsidy» by the government — raises questions about arguments from ministers that the policy was designed to save money and free up existing stock to cut housing queues.

Libertarians often argue that people should be free to risk «brain damage» by using drugs — but «brain damage» undercuts the libertarian argument that people tend to choose wisely or rationally.

The argument against free will is that each decision we make is completely influenced by our previous life experience, so that given a certain choice this experience will trigger us to respond in a certain way, which is not a free choice.

He starts out his argument straight away by admitting that machines build hypertrophy just as well as free weights.

Consequently, I consider that the axis of future arguments and researches on this issue should mostly revolve around the following issues: the political interests and reasons behind the debate regarding the prohibition of Islamic outfits and whether the rights of women that follow the Islamic dress code are violated by the religion of Islam and their families or by the Western idea of «how a free woman should be».

Though the answer is easy, the free eBook The Complete User Guide To Moodle Chapter 3 by Lambda Solutions will give you all the arguments that support this answer.

This argument was echoed by the New Schools Network, which supports the opening of free schools, saying that they had provided more places at a lower cost.

He further defended the business strategy by saying this: «The argument that information wants to be free is only said by those who want it for free.»

I understand very well the mentality that a «dead tree» book is «something» that people pay for without argument because it's a material object while an ebook seems to be regarded (even by many fans of the medium) as something that costs «nothing» and should therefore be free or very cheap, which brings me to...

It doesn't help that the exact same argument (letting readers read for free creates new customers) is used by --

«As lawyers, it was our job to put a legal framework around what was already a compelling argument based on the plain language of the trust, the charter and the school's founding documents, and confirmed by 155 years of free education.

(There is also the argument from the practical: I suspect that if you could put a straw into the seabed and suck out enough free methane to change the world, the oil companies would have figured it out by now...)

It carries the implication that climate science is otherwise free of debate, and that denialist views, rather than having lost the argument by the standard processes of science, have instead been suppressed by some form of political correctness.

The «freedom of speech» argument was echoed by ExxonMobil's legal team, as well as numerous other conservative groups including the Pacific Legal Foundation, and Heritage Foundation and the recently - formed Free Speech in Science Project, a group created by the same lawyers who defended the Competitive Enterprise Institute in the past.

... that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them.

Similarly, Monbiot claims that climate change deniers — the ones he compares nuclear sceptics to — have not produced their scientific arguments from an objective, transparent, impartial basis; they are driven by a commitment to a «free - market ideology», or more straightforwardly, by their lust for profit.

I liked his argument that it was st range that «free market conservatives» who seemed to think that the market could solve pract ically any problem have decided that the market can't deal with climate change by imposing a cost on carbon emissions.

Arguments of the type summarized in Emanuel, Neelin, and Bretherton, 1994 suggest that attempts to alter the free tropospheric temperature profile will modify temperatures by a rather indirect path — heating perturbations will modify the circulation in a way that then modifies the temperature and humidity of the air near the surface, which finally puts you on a different moist adiabat.

The appeals court agreed with Koch's argument that he and the others at the party were detained, questioned, and not free to leave the «to - be-smelled» line created by the policeman.

1898)(«no one can obtain the exclusive right to publish the laws of a state»)(Harlan, J., sitting by designation); Nash v. Lathrop, 142 Mass. 29, 6 N.E. 559 (Mass. 1886)(«Every citizen is presumed to know the law thus declared, and it needs no argument to show that justice requires that all should have free access to the opinions, and that it is against sound public policy to prevent this, or to suppress and keep from the earliest knowledge of the public the statutes or the decisions and opinions of the justices.»).

This argument was not made by any of the parties in this case and the Advocate - General used the international law argument to conclude that EU - law was not applicable at all, whereas the CJEU — in my view — stays quite cryptic about how to fit in the interplay between EU - law and international law in its framework / criteria of judging free movement cases.

The jury's role is always the same - show up, be selected and sworn in, listen to the opening and closing arguments and the evidence that the judge admits under the rules of evidence, listen to the jury instructions from the judge, deliberate and render a verdict based upon that deliberation in a manner set forth on a jury verdict form that the jury is provided with by the judge, they do this for sub-minimum wage jury fees, a few free meals, and maybe a parking or transit voucher.

The ECJ rightly dispatched with the rather outlandish argument that since Treaty provisions on free movement of capital would be affected by the EUSFTA, the EU enjoyed exclusive competence pursuant article 3 (2) TFEU (see paras. 229 - 238).