Sentences with phrase «free concept in»

CAGE DIAPER is a new, hassle free concept in bedding products.

Cellist, composer, and improviser Tomeka Reid combines her love of groove with freer concepts in a set inspired by Scenes from the Collection.

Not exact matches

He also expressed doubt about the concept of embedding wage standards in a trade agreement:» It would establish a principle wage norm in free trade agreements, which is certainly outside the spirit of the World Trade Organization.»

The free mobile app, bearing the apropos tagline «your personal magazine,» is often compared to a magazine in concept because it looks and feels quite like one, albeit a smaller, interactive glossy tucked neatly into your smartphone or tablet.

Paco Underhill knows what they look at, what they buy and why, so get ready to put a huge dent in the concept of customers» free will.

I know a top 25 Texas law firm that is interested in joining forces in your plan; concept would be free legal services to the venture at the point you invest and to the point of profitability (90 days) to be sure the business is set up properly and well advised.

Naples also seeks to educate Millennials about Modern Portfolio Theory and the importance of consistent contributions in a tax - free environment, as well as diversification and rebalancing concepts to smooth long - term returns through bear and bull markets.

Discover how we can help your entire workforce gain a complete, consistent understanding of these concepts in our free Paycom Learning Toolkit.

These are similar in concept to commission - free ETFs (to see which brokers are the best for these, click here).

In addition to offering free office space for six months, the incubator will also provide companies with hands - on mentorship from Panagoulias and his co-founder, Raza Khan, shared business resources and discounts, weekly sessions to help design, challenge, test and validate the business / concept and access to seed funding and venture capitalists.

Realty Income shall be free to use any ideas, concepts, know - how or techniques contained in such communication for any purpose whatsoever, including but not limited to, developing, manufacturing and marketing products.

The free will concept is totally denied by god's supposed behavior in the bible and the claims of Christians.

In fact, even the concept of a religious foundation for Statehood guarantees theocracy, and as such should revolt all truly free men, ESPECIALLY Americans.

There is a film documentary that is pretty good which you can see here in full for free, but it distorts and waters down the concepts a bit.

@believer, I don't know if you'd call me an atheist, but I don't believe in a god or gods and, while open to the possibility that some may exist, am highly unlikely ever to believe in the Christian god, mostly because 1) most versions require an anti-scientific concept of «free will» and 2) I think there's abundant evidence of human creation of the Christian god concept.

Once you free yourself of the mental slavery of the god concept, you too will hear statements about «the bible being vetted and proven true» and either laugh or shake your head in sadness and disbelief for your fellow man.

Atheists have no great obligation to shoot down every incomprehensible, evidence - free, blathering theist's god concept in order to demonstrate some kind of impressive thoroughness!

The concept of once saved always saved takes a bit to get your head around but Gods grace is greater than our sin and greater than our good works it just takes faith in Jesus Christ to recieve Gods grace.In saying that to continue to sin as a christian is like playing with fire you will be burnt.Paul talks of the sexual immorality in corinthian church of the son and father that were sleeping with the same wife they were excommunicated from the church the members were not allowed to even eat with them until they repented.There are consequences for our actions.The other side to this is that if you continue to sin as a christian you are not walking by faith but walking by the flesh and are really backsliding.In the backslidden state you also become powerless and open to attack by satan as long as we walk in the flesh he can influence us to get worse not better.If we are walking in Christ satan may still try to tempt us but we are empowered by the holy spirit and overcome him and our faith increases.Both are saved by grace but one is powerless because of sin versus saved but an overcomer having been set free from sin i think this is what Paul was trying to explain.It is better to be an overcomer than overcome by sin.brentnz

«Paradoxical instances,» «aleatory points,» «dark precursors»: these, I would suggest, are the only divine elements in the Deleuzean chaosmos, «primitives» in both a methodological and metaphysical sense: «savage concepts» apparently resonating «with «things in their wild and free [not yet actualized] state» (cf. D&R xx).

Correlatively, understanding God involves growth in one's grasp of the concept «saved,» the capacity to discern one's own, and everything else's, healing and liberation from fault; but that is inseparable from, though not the same as, growth in one's grasp of the concept «free,» a capacity to respond appropriately to that salvation.

actually there is no free will, because we humans is part of god, our conciousness is his.therefore everything we do has a purpose only beyond our immediate comprehension or understanding.the problem lies in our concept or belief of the absoluteness of the philosophy of science, which by itself is part of gods evolutionary process, atheists has this mentality, but since they are part of the process so its gods will through us.

Muslims will NEVER be Americans!!!! They don't have the capacity to understand freedom and democracy!!!! Only through Jesus can anyone understand the concept of freedom!!!! There's a reason why all of the free nations in the world are Christian and all of the dictatorships are Muslim or communist (atheist)!!!!

American Christians seem to have no concept of freedom or American ideals... in which their religious beliefs are completely irrelevant to laws in a free, 21st - century United States.

I do believe that God created concept and the idea to have a Heaven and Earth by granting everything to have free will and set everything in motion as he allowed time to do so, because I think without time nothing that we know it really exist, and Carbon Datings would say otherwise.

You are correct about free speech: we should be American enough to accept the concept that you have the right to say what you did in your post.

Because God is communicating to mankind through the Scriptures in the Bible in a style that reeks with an obvious understood implication that the hearer / reader, mankind, has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject His call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts (some folk briefly refer to it as man's free will), I let the concept of mankind having this inherent ability be the precedence.

Grace is a powerful thing but to live a life of non-repentance only to use the «get out of jail free card» in one's dying breath is a twisted concept that has been theologically exploited by Evangelicals in order to «get the numbers up» and provide family members of those who have died with a warm feeling that their loved one made the right choice at the end.

So throughout his writings, and in a great variety of ways, he elaborated his concept of the individual, of the person who is free to grow in Christian love, hope, joy and peace because he or she is not a spiritual slave to social context.

The gift of free will is a concept that our finite minds can barely grasp in its entirety.

What most Westerners don't understand is that people who have grown up under the Sharia Law and in the Middle East do not understand the concept of free speech.

Because God is communicating to mankind through the Scriptures in the Bible in a style that reeks with an obvious understood implication that the hearer / reader, mankind, has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject His call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts (some folk briefly refer to it as man's inherent - free - will capacity), I let the concept of mankind having this inherent ability be the precedence; and I interpret difficult passages that can possibly be interpreted to appear contradictory to that precedence (of mankind having inherent - free - will) in light of mankind having inherent - free - will capacity.

In accord with this concept of the free market came other freedoms to supplement and enhance it: the freedom of an individual to engage in enterprise, the freedom to speak his mind and worship his God, the freedom to choose those who govern, as well as protection from those who govern, through a system of «checks and balances» whereby each of the three branches of government curbed the power of the otherIn accord with this concept of the free market came other freedoms to supplement and enhance it: the freedom of an individual to engage in enterprise, the freedom to speak his mind and worship his God, the freedom to choose those who govern, as well as protection from those who govern, through a system of «checks and balances» whereby each of the three branches of government curbed the power of the otherin enterprise, the freedom to speak his mind and worship his God, the freedom to choose those who govern, as well as protection from those who govern, through a system of «checks and balances» whereby each of the three branches of government curbed the power of the others.

The concept of free will in relation to the christian view is an illusion.

there's really no room for the concept of an independent entity possessed of «will» in a worldview shaped by cause and effect; the only place for «will» to retreat to is the zone of true randomness, of complete uncertainty, which means that truly free will as such must be completely inscrutible [sic]... Statistical laws govern the decay of a block of uranium, but whether or not this atom of uranium chooses to fission in this instant is a completely unpredictable event — fundamentally unpredictable, something which simply can not be known — which is equally good evidence for the proposition that it's God's (or the atom's) will whether it splits or remains whole, as for the proposition that it's random chance.

This is not the place to show that this concept of freedom either exists explicitly in the creed of the Church or is implied by the teaching of Christianity, that free faith justifies, that salvation must be received from God in freedom and that the eternity of salvation is not an indefinite continuation of time but must be understood as the final result of history itself which is produced by freedom.

Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The Free Press, 1978, 35) This discussion is very important to Whitehead's concept of man because in a later discussion he denies that the inorganic occasions of the human body form a corpuscular society.

The question, therefore, is whether such a concept of a cause to which the infinite reality of pure act belongs as a factor constituting it without becoming an intrinsic constituent of the entity of the finite cause itself, but in some way remains free, detached from the process of becoming, but provides the real ground of the self - transcending operation of the finite agent itself, is a valid and demonstrable concept, or only a paradoxical and intrinsically self - contradictory construction which can only conceal the fact that our thought has reached an impasse.

Lovers do not want to be free, and the very concept of «free love», if this means love without commitment, is a contradiction in terms.

We used a similar concept to explain it to our kids: entry to heaven is free, if you do something God wants you to do, and no person says thank you, then God says thank you, and there's another jewel in the crown that you get to give to Jesus once you're in heaven (the crowns we throw down before the throne).

To take away individualism takes away the whole concept of free will which is essential in any relationship with God.

In both myth and poetry there is a freer and more fruitful use of words and concepts than prose, logic, or scientific description would allow.

The comparatively recent popularity of cognitive behaviorism, with its implicit nod to free will in its emphasis on the importance of beliefs, concepts, and ideas as well as environment in influencing human attitudes and conduct, shows that in some circles determinism is being somewhat moderated.

Griffin defines this concept in various ways, but as applied to his critique of free - will theodicies, the illuminating power of a theodicy is closely tied to the degree to which individuals find it convincing.

The concept of free will contradicts the normative character of the postmodern values and in particular of the right to choose, the supreme value of the new culture.

According to Hartshorne, all thought — if free of absurdity or inconsistency — represents something necessary (and so never simply future) or else something contingent (and so now future, or once future).28 In either case, the modal concept is related to the experienceable, furnishing a potential datum for knowledge or awareness.

Yet the extent to which the meaning of the term is inextricably related to historical research must be explained in some detail, if the concept is to be freed from the ambiguity which continues to haunt it.

Although the principles of AA are so supposed to be for everyone regardless of religion (or lack thereof), in practice the concept of a «Higher Power» to a free thinker is a huge issue... if I don't believe in a Higher Power, how can I get through the 12 steps?

Basic concepts analyzed by St. Thomas — concepts of the human person, conscience, liberty, the source of political power in the people, and the twin principles of the consent of the governed and the «mixed regime» — provided rich soil for the free institutions that were to arise much later in history.

There he says, one, that the shift from the concept of «the State's role as providers of equal opportunities to every citizen» to that of providing education, health and other social services «to those who can afford to pay» is a U-turn in public policy which «has been made surreptitiously by administrative action without public discussion and legislative sanction»; two, that the total commercialization of social sectors is «alien even to free market societies»; and three, that «the ready acceptance of self - financing concept in social sectors alien even to free - market societies is the end result of gradual disenchantment with the Kerala Model of Development», which has been emphasizing the social dimension rather than the economic, but that it is quite false to present the situation as calling for a choice between social development and economic growth.

Consequently, each specialized discipline has a kind of autonomy in that each is free to contribute its basic concepts and insights to the over-all generalized description which is metaphysics.