Sentences with phrase «free decisions for»

Not exact matches

When you create this system for your nutrition, you're freeing up your brain power for big decisions in your business.

Buru Energy and APPEA have commended the Shire of Broome for its decision to vote down an anti-gas declaration that sought to declare the region frack - free.

The decision about whether to stick with free listings, enter the PFP universe, or combine the approaches depends on your budget, your competitors» strategies, and a sense for how your target audience will respond (many users dislike paid placements, especially those that look too much like free search results).

And if it doesn't go well, feel free to beat yourself up for a few minutes, but then make sure you learn from it so that next time you add that piece of information to your decision - making process.

«Automation creates a stress free, clear - minded environment for people to focus on more meaningful financial decisions, rather than day - to - day bills,» explains Certified Financial Planner Samuel Rad.

It is perfectly natural to be intimidated, but our goal at BiggerPockets is to help you overcome your fears and your countless questions by providing as much free information as possible to help you make the best decisions for your own needs.

The Conservative government's decision to double contribution limits for Tax - Free Savings Accounts (TFSA) is both unnecessary and unfair.

To help entrepreneurs in their decision making, TMX.com provides free online toolkits that include a number of educational and information resources on going public, including listing requirements for specific industries.

For those impacted by recent disaster events, SBP has free, vital, and easy to understand step - by - step guides to help homeowners make smart, informed decisions during a stressful time: Navigating FEMA Avoiding Contractor Fraud Effective DIY Mold Remediation Filing Insurance Claims

We believe that our Board of Directors should be free to make compensation decisions to further and promote the best interests of our shareowners, rather than to qualify for corporate tax deductions.

You have the option of going for a paid - for binary options robot, but is this a good decision when there is an alternative that is free?

However, in a consumer market, «buy apple ipod» or «purchase Toshiba laptop,» or «free shipping keurig k — cup coffee» are realistic keywords to bid on for late stage purchasing decisions.

Make it clear that the information you're giving out for free is important and can help them make the right decisions.

The horrible part is that if you had bought your stock a few weeks before this decision was made and the distribution paid out at the end of the year, you would effectively be paying more than 25 years of investment tax for someone else that got to cash out scot - free.

Free Votes have more priority for us in making decision to add new coins to GoUrl Gateway than Paid Votes.

A free product trial, on the other hand, may not be as educational in nature, but it's still a very valuable offer for existing leads you're trying to nurture and who are closer to making a purchasing decision.

Venue reform was the one piece of comprehensive legislation that had broad support in Congress, so while the court's decision frees up capacity for patent reform advocates to tackle other problems with the patent system, the hard fights are still to come.

Once you know that you can make an informed decision as to whether you will earn a higher return from a tax free state or national municipal bond fund or a taxable bond fund of a similar credit quality and average maturity (which is generally going to provide higher before tax returns) is going to be better for you.

So our nonfoundationism is a decision against the progressive devotion to History; the point of life is to keep the people around right now as alive, free, and comfortable as possible, not to use them as fodder for some glorious future.

I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»

However, even most public goods should be left in the hands of the public, where virtue must guide, and where free persons are accountable for their decisions.

The fact that there are ramifications for choosing not to doesn't mean you don't have the ability to make the decision for yourself... free will.

These decisions can never simply be made for us in advance by others — if that were the case, we would no longer be free.

For even if we grant that God's free decision is temporally emergent though intrinsically nontemporal, Whitehead seems to grant, and Ford and Brown clearly do, that God's freedom is solely the freedom of his primordial envisagement.

Wisdom decisions are where there is no clear mandate and so I'm free to discern and decide for myself what to do.

In this» nexus of circumstances, of the free words of contingent men, through which a decision of God's will is effected, we thus see that God has plans for Naaman.

It is central to this proposal, however, to stress that when a school makes such a decision to be «open,» «interconfessional,» or whatever, it should not delude itself into claiming that it merely provides a «theologically neutral arena» and «level playing field» for free theological inquiry and exchange of opinion.

For all democratic institutions in a state are meant to secure the necessary freedom for indi - viduals and groups to produce free initiatives and decisions outside the sphere of social manipulation and planniFor all democratic institutions in a state are meant to secure the necessary freedom for indi - viduals and groups to produce free initiatives and decisions outside the sphere of social manipulation and plannifor indi - viduals and groups to produce free initiatives and decisions outside the sphere of social manipulation and planning.

This, of course, does not mean that there; is, avoidably as well as unavoidably, much that is «undemocratic» in the Church, if for no other reason than that the baptized children must slowly be led by the Church to a free and responsible decision of personal faith without which no adult can be a member of the Church in the fullest sense.

If the future decision of God is constitutive for the actual being of individuals, it is hard to see how they are free to choose their own fate.

As a free citizen in a free country, shouldn't I be able to make that decision for myself?

Socinus really believed in human freedom and argued that God can not know our free decisions eternally, for they are not eternally there to be known.

Rather than viewing it as a decision made for the sake of living a life free from the world's demands, Augustine agonized over the «evils» of sexuality in a doctrinal context that virtually denied the human capacity for free moral decision.

It is not just free - floating groups banded together for narrow political gain, but an intelligent form of life requiring the constant engagement of its members in discussion and decision - making, in defining and redefining its goals and purposes.

In the other model are seven «liberal - free» characteristics in the philosophers» tradition, which Kimball summarizes thus:» (1) Epistemological skepticism underlies (2) the free and (3) intellectual search for truth, which is forever elusive, and so all possible views must be (4) tolerated and given (5) equal hearing (6) with the final decision left to each individual, (7) who pursues truth for its own sake.

The free man has no purpose here and means there, which he fetches for his purpose: he has only the one thing, his repeated decision to approach his destiny.

That doesn't mean it isn't your choice, and it's not my job to make your choices, if you believe you can make the best decisions for yourself, and you don't need God, that is your God given right after all, God gave you that right, to make your own decisions with a free will, for you to decide upon what is good or bad as laid out in Biblical principles (as a matter of fact historicly).

Yet God is the One who values and uses, because God incorporates into the divine life which is everlasting the good that takes place in the historical sequence; and God overrules or uses for good that which comes from the «vain imagination of foolish men» in their sin and defection — and, we may add, from anything else that is evil or wrong thanks to the free decisions made by the creatures in their divinely granted capacity to choose among relevant possibilities.

However powerful are the effects of Adam's fall in intensifying the inclination for concupiscence and sinning, the free will and the moral ability to make decisions between good and evil are not impaired.

Those, on the other hand, who say that they are in despair are generally such as have a nature so much more profound that they must become conscious of themselves as spirit, or such as by the hard vicissitudes of life and its dreadful decisions have been helped to become conscious of themselves as spirit — either one or the other, for rare is the man who truly is free from despair.

However, Pilate still had free will, for the decision was his.

It is tantamount to blasphemy for anyone to argue that man is capable, of his own free will, to make a decision for Christ, when the Son of God says in words that can not be misunderstood, «No man can come to me, except the Father... draw him» (Spencer, TULIP, 42).

Conservatives are praising the decision as a firm stand against liberalism, while progressives are hailing Waltke as a martyr for the cause of truth and free thought.

Holly its not about how we feel its the decision you made to accept Jesus so you are saved and you are now part of Gods family and the body of Christ.The enemy likes to play mind games to make us doubt our faith especially as a new believer.The word tells us that when we believe in Jesus we are saved.John 3:16 Personally i do nt believe we can lose that as it is a free gift not based on what we do right or do wrong.As he died for us while we were still sinners..

Most scholars praise Jackson for «widening» the reach of his opinion by converting the religious freedom claim into a free speech claim, and the decision is routinely treated as one of the strongest vindications of civil liberties in twentieth - century American law.

Assumption of control by any one member of the group can have as a consequence the denial to others of the proper exercise of their capacity for free decision.

For if anybody had a sure knowledge of his future this very knowledge would either leave the space of his freedom still open and unknown, and would demand that he should take note of the situation of his freedom, or if the free decision were already included in the knowledge, this would be all the more a demand actually to make this decision.

The unlimited freedom of everybody to claim absolute freedom for everything works like a sort of secret brain - washing by anonymous powers which does not necessarily abolish freedom but narrows in advance the sphere in which the individual can make his free decision.

For it behaves as if I were involved with the free decision of another only when I make the same decision, but not before.

If salvation depends on YOU making an informed, mature, free - will decision for Christ... salvation is no longer free.