As such, water rights activists call for the preservation and protection of freshwater sources so that all people may enjoy access to safe, clean, and
free drinking water supplies.
Not exact matches
Take a look at the expensive «energy»
drinks and vitamin
waters invading the supermarket and health food store shelves — energy we could all be getting in endless
supply and for
free just by eating whole foods and nothing more.
If your
water supply is clean —
free of bacteria and other microbes — and safe to
drink, you can wash bottles the way you would all your other dishes.
This
frees up northern
water supplies for other uses, such as
drinking and sanitation.
They advocated for cleaner, better - ventilated cars
supplied with pure
drinking water and
free of clearly sick people.
Drinking water free of chemicals like sodium fluoride and chlorine is essential because
water will help flush the waste away, but the chemicals dumped into most western public
water supplies will kill off good intestinal flora, and therefore should be avoided.
To which extent do you think the analysis of the ECJ in Case C - 43 / 10 Nomarchiaki on irrigation (environment) and
supply of
drinking water (human health) as imperative reasons of overriding public interest is transposalbe as a rule - of - reason - justification to the
free movement provisions?