Mr. Keith Cressman, a Methodist minister, filed suit against the state alleging violations of his rights to freedom of speech, due process, and
the free exercise of religion under the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
Not exact matches
Actually this country prohibits the making
of any law respecting an establishment
of religion or impeding the
free exercise of religion, meaning that this country is not a country
under god.
If I
under stand correctly, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.
With their pro bono representation, I sued several Washington officials, among them Governor Gary Locke, arguing that the state's exclusion
of theology majors from the Promise Scholarship program violated my rights to
free speech,
free exercise of religion, and equal protection
under the laws.
In the narrower legal context, this Hayekian - Rawlsian debate usually manifests itself in arguments about whether the law should protect «negative rights,» that is, protect persons from government encroachment on their inalienable rights — like private property and
free exercise of religion, or whether the law should foster «positive rights,» that is, promote the rights
of people to receive tangible things like
free health care or housing
under the auspices
of equal treatment
under the law.