Not exact matches
Regular First Things readers know that the late Father Richard John Neuhaus never tired of arguing that the First Amendment contains not two religion clauses but one: «no establishment» and «
free exercise» are not two
free - floating
provisions at occasional loggerheads with each other but....
What, do you suppose, was the evil that the Founders had in mind when they adopted the First Amendment's Religion Clause with its «
free exercise» and «no establishment»
provisions?
If the
exercise work rate is
free to vary, then experimental interventions such as changes in ambient temperature, oxygen content of the inspired air, energy substrate availability or the
provision of incorrect distance feedback all alter the power output (pacing strategy), whereas the rate of increase in RPE has been found to be similar between conditions.13 20 21 24 — 26
The question now facing the court is whether such
provisions, if used to exclude organizations from aid programs based solely on the organization's religious status, violate the federal Constitution's guarantee of
free religious
exercise.
This means that excluding religious schools may violate not one but three separate constitutional
provisions: the equal protection clause, the
free exercise clause (which protects the
free exercise of religion), and the
free speech clause.
Furthermore, as we know,
free movement in the EU has been achieved through negative integration (the direct application of the Treaty
provisions on the fundamental freedoms to remove obstacles in national laws) or through positive measures (secondary EU legislation, harmonising national measures affecting the internal market), without the need of conferring investment rights or special remedies for EU undertakings or citizens
exercising their freedom of movement.
Its
provisions are intended to protect the rights of UK and EU citizens and «enable the effective
exercise of rights derived from union law and based upon past life choices, where those citizens have
exercised free movement rights by the specified date».
Considering the current rhetoric of those advocating withdrawal from the EU based on or around the need to control (and reduce) immigration, including from (at least some member states of) the EU, the negotiations about transitional
provisions and / or the creation of domestic
provisions for the «transfer» of those currently
exercising EU
free movement rights into one or other category under the Immigration Rules may well themselves be not without difficulties.