«This is a sensible ruling that will help protect
free expression in Sweden,» said Mitch Stoltz, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
«We have already discussed the nature of the principles and values underlying the vigilant protection of
free expression in a society such as ours.
Inspired by these posts on workplace speech, Fox offers a «mini-review» of a book by Vanderbilt Professor Bruce Barry, Speechless: The Erosion of
Free Expression in the American Workplace.
Jesse Harris maintains a message - oriented art practice as a platform for direct communication of his personal politics and to discuss the limits of
free expression in culture.
Disputes over
free expression in the arts have always loomed as struggles between creativity and repression, transgression and outrage, candor and hypocrisy.
«Creative Time is dedicated to the ability of artists» voices to shape society, and the importance of
free expression in public space.
«Creative Time is dedicated to the ability of artists» voices to shape society, and the importance of
free expression in public space,» Creative Time Executive Director Katie Hollander said in the announcement.
Though those were dark days for
free expression in America, we still produced some beautiful films and stars back then.
«Faculty at private colleges and universities lack the constitutional protection of
free expression in their workplace because the First Amendment doesn't cover speech at work for private institutions,» he said.
You don't have, exactly,
free expression in China.
Instead this celebrated author has been reduced to a kind of billboard upon which almost any cause can be advertised, and it is in this purely functional guise that he is recognized in India, whether by supporters for whom «Salman Rushdie» represents the long siege of
free expression in that country, or detractors who gain visibility for a variety of unrelated agendas by threatening him.
Religious groups in this country have tried to stifle
free expression in music, literature and books, but the First Amendment of the Const / itution protects free speech, as well as the freedom to worship (or not worship) as you will.
Even if you control the minds of your people through hard grips on the local media, there is hardly anything you can do to gag
free expressions in this Twitter / Facebook / Youtube / Snapchat / Whatsapp generation.
Not exact matches
«I hear fearful voices calling for building walls and distancing people they label as others, for blocking
free expression, for slowing immigration, reducing trade and,
in some cases around the world, even cutting access to the internet,» Zuckerberg said during a Facebook conference
in April.
We will consider all available options, including those for appeal, to ensure that these networks on which the Internet depends continue to provide a
free and open platform for innovation and
expression, and operate
in the interest of all Americans.
«We will consider all available options, including those for appeal, to ensure that these networks on which the internet depends continue to provide a
free and open platform for innovation and
expression, and operate
in the interest of all Americans.»
FCC chairman Ajit Pai and two fellow Republican commissioners said the rules had deterred investment and innovation, while two Democrats
in the minority warned that the rollback would jeopardize
free expression and competition online.
«We must be open to alternative points of view, not alternative facts,» Cook said, while accepting the
Free Expression Award at the Newseum
in Washington, D.C, according to 9 to 5 Mac.
In a remarkable
expression of business interests» frustration with the House anti-reform stalwarts, a Wall Street Journal editorial last week criticized their obsession with border security as «a case of the Republican Party letting its blood - and - soil wing trump its supposedly
free - market principles.»
In the United States, the fair use defense is designed to protect
free speech and
free expression.
«We will hold talks and rallies and throw massive parties, all
in the name of
free expression and the First Amendment,» the post reads.
«When you have freedom of speech and freedom of
expression and don't get thrown
in jail by criticizing a bad idea, it's more likely bad ideas will get exposed, and it's not a coincidence oppressive regimes are also oppressive
in clamping down on
free speech.»
His ban from visiting Britain
in June 2009 has made him the «poster child» for
free speech, not only for Americans concerned about the cultural shift towards totalitarianism and their rights to freedom of
expression, but for people around the globe.
If the federal and state governments come
in and slap new regulations and oversight on these companies, it's their own fault for practicing elitist arrogance
in an attempt to shape a specific narrative that damages the very fabric of a society where the first amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the rights of
free expression and
free speech.
Can you point out where
in the Bill of Rights it states that the government must furnish, at reasonable cost, space for said
free expression?
♦
In a Wall Street Journal op - ed, Yale President Peter Salovey defends his university's dual commitment to «the principles of inclusion and
free expression.»
«Then, can
free people gather
in such a way as to respect one anotherâ $ ™ s freedom and not impair it, but to give it the opportunity for fullest
expression in the context of community?»
The Harvard president said she would allow the black Mass to continue, citing the value of
free expression on campus, but planned attend a prayer ceremony Monday night at St. Paul's Church
in Cambridge.
And all you hear is «freedom of
expression» and «we live
in the
free world» garbage.
More recently, theologians and church leaders from denominations that have historic ties with churches
in the north have encouraged African Christian
expressions that are
free of northern acculturation, are faithful to the gospel and draw upon traditional African
This is,
in fact, the ultimate
expression of
free will: the
free will to accept or reject the God who gave us that
free will.
Consistent with that attitude's deepest wisdom, our intellectuals, even of the left - wing, are often employed
in «our institutions of higher learning and are permitted relatively
free expression because we know that they are really no threat to us.
«Even though starting a government meeting with a religious prayer is offensive to many, considered a violation of our const.itution by many, makes many feel ostracized and as if their voice will not be given equal consideration to those who are religions, I think we should still start of government meetings with prayers because this is a country that believes
in the
free expression of ones beliefs and opinions without fear of percecution.»
Recreationalist Charles Brightbill is too inclusive
in describing play as «the
free, pleasurable, immediate, and natural
expression of animals.
dvdrichards1115 -»... this is a country that believes
in the
free expression of ones beliefs and opinions without fear of percecution.»
Ong is atypical, however,
in his pointing out that work, too, «is an
expression of freedom and joy» when authentically pursued.67 Ong rightly understands that it is false to draw a distinction between play as individual,
free, and spontaneous, and work as collective, intentional, and ordered.
(Bultmannian spiritualizing, for which, if God is the Wholly Other, all these manifestations are just forms of
expression with no real content, is certainly quite unacceptable, for why should not the Almighty be
free to act
in this way too?)
One side of me wants people to speak their minds freely, the other half wants that
free expression to go through a «common - sense» filter
in the individual's head.
«Full and
free discourse» is,
in other words, a summary
expression of the internal conditions of discourse noted earlier: equal freedom of all participants to advance and contest any claim and the arguments for it, and uncompromised commitment on the part all participants to seek the truth.
If, that is, God is
in a significant sense a
free agent, some at least of his actions will not be necessary
expressions of his intrinsic nature.
If we succeed
in changing the hierarchies we have imposed on people according to their race and color and sex, then we can have a world of persons, of horizontal relationship rather than hierarchy, a world of
expression rather than oppression, where «there are no more distinctions between Jew and Greek, slave and
free, male and female,» where we are all «one
in Christ Jesus.»
Moreover,
in 1970 the Associated Members of the Episcopal Conference of Eastern Africa, which includes the Catholic bishops of Kenya, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda and Zambia, affirmed the declaration as a basis for parents» right to choose their children's education and for the right of
free expression and association.
Yet liberalism as a political theory, understood as a cooperative enterprise for mutual advantage among
free and equal persons, is considered by friend and foe alike the essential
expression of what it means to he a political animal
in the modern West.
Such groups have claimed that federal hate crimes laws will silence preachers, ignoring those laws» robust protections for
free speech and religious
expression, as well as the experience
in the many states with such protections already
in place.
An adequate formulation or
expression of this,
free from objections, is fraught with immense difficulty because of the inevitable ambiguity of words, which is not easy to eradicate even
in technical usage.
He is doing as Jesus did and expressing love at the same time which is as Jesus intended... doing these things
in love is
in the Bible but Jesus did not explicitly state who to express that love... It seems God left some room for
free expression of love.
The intense experience of the personal encounter with God is expressed
in free and open emotional language that satisfies the quest for spirituality and enriches religious
expression and popular culture.
Douthat believes that there is a full scale war being waged by secularists against the
free expression of Judaism and Christianity (
in particular) outside of house of worship walls, and gets into some reasons for the attack on the first liberty area mentioned
in the First Amendment.
In any case, none of these reactions, fortunately, restricts the cartoonist's right to free expression (which is also part of his livelihood, in a lot of cases
In any case, none of these reactions, fortunately, restricts the cartoonist's right to
free expression (which is also part of his livelihood,
in a lot of cases
in a lot of cases).
These were willing to shed all the inherited and supposedly unchangeable dogmas
in order to be
free to explore fresh forms and
expressions of the Christian faith which would be more relevant to the new cultural and intellectual climate.