Sentences with phrase «free human beings who»

In Steiner's words, «Our highest endeavor [is] to develop free human beings who, of themselves, are able to give purpose and direction to their lives.»

Waldorf educators, whether they work in independent or in public schools, hold Rudolf Steiner's goal for education to be eloquently expressed in this quote: «Our highest endeavor must be to develop free human beings who are able of themselves to impart purpose and meaning to their lives.»

«Our highest endeavor must be to develop free human beings who, of themselves, are able to give purpose and direction to their lives.»

Not exact matches

Poloz has a free hand, but he's human; if you were facing a decision that could go either way, and you knew the person who is ultimately your boss favours one direction over the other, what would you do?

Yet, thinkers from Edmund Burke to Russell Kirk have shown the deeply anti-conservative bases of the social contract theory of Lockean (and Hobbesian) origin, one that is premised upon a conception of human beings as naturally «free and independent,» as autonomous individuals who are thought to exist by nature detached from a web of relationships that include family, community, Church, region, and so on.

As for theology, the word means speaking - of - God, which in Christian terms means speaking of the One who is Truth — the Truth Who makes us free in the deepest meaning of human liberatiwho is Truth — the Truth Who makes us free in the deepest meaning of human liberatiWho makes us free in the deepest meaning of human liberation.

«All methods and techniques — and of course all human beings who propound them — are merely instruments to help the student attain a methodless technique - free teacherless state.

If it were possible to have creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free, should not God have brought into existence such creatures instead?

Hope amidst suffering, hope when men know only defeat and despair, hope when death seems to smother out the shoots of life springing from the hearts of men, hope for our society, our world, our city, our schools, courts, prisons, legislatures, hope for our children, for our elderly, hope for all the millions of men and women over the face of this globe who simply want to live out their lives as free human beings not trampled down and stepped on by the overlords of this world.

No human being then is an absolutely autonomous individual who ought to be able to live his or her life without reference to any higher or more demanding truth in order to be complete, to be happy and to be free.

For a guide I would suggest Benedict XVI, who understood deeply that the quest for the truth of God which takes a living form in monasticism must lie at the foundation of any social order that is finally human and any political order that is truly free (See here and here).

The joy of the gospel of marriage springs from charity: 2 the same charity that compels bishops3 to faithfully proclaim the good news of marriage revealed in Christ; the same charity that is inseparable from the Truth, who frees the human person and reveals to him what it means to be human.4 Only in Jesus does every human being discover what it means to be truly human, to be made for God and to live in relationship with God, to have true happiness.

You might be surprised if I were to tell you that there are human beings who are free of diseases such as the ones mentioned (depression, anxiety, fear, etc) but does that mean you have to believe to be free from those ailments?

The Galatians are also encouraged to identify with Titus, who, with Paul's help, responded to the circumcision - free gospel of Christ instead of the human desires of the false brothers.

If your sin involved other human beings, or if you believe you need their help in keeping free of this sin, or you need their counsel, advice, or accountability, you should also confess this sin to another person you trust, or to a group of such people, who will love you no matter what and will help you through the temptations and addictions of this particular sin.

The only flawless, perfect human being free from sin who died in our place endure unbelievable suffering.

Many can now understand such judgements as that of Loren Eiseley, who did not speak of human difference from other creatures in the glowing terms of the Enlightenment: how we are «rational,» capable of «free will», and so on.

The Christian explanation of who we are as free persons might make more sense that Rousseau's account of human freedom as an inexplicable cosmic accident.

Satan is supposed to be exactly like human beings, with free will but, like Mark Twain observed, who prays for his soul?

It was God himself who, jealous of his prerogatives, was withstanding the free course of human investigation.

It is the human who love to innovate things by using the «free will» and here also greediness of power and supremacy that no one wants to discover or accept the truth...

And yet the actual situation of human existence is one in which the self is not really free, one in which people often do not have a clear sense of who they are, and one in which true personality is lost in various forms of enslavement to convention or mass - mindedness.

Though Barth failed to see how completely God's free love entailed human freedom, he did powerfully realize that human liberation is possible only if the God who creates and sustains this universe has the all - sufficient freedom and love to sustain that liberation.

It shows itself as power of love which challenges, gives life and frees human beings, at least those who hold themselves open to this offer.

Though Barth failed to see how completely God's free love entailed human freedom, he did powerfully realize that human liberation is possible only if the God who creates and sustains this universe has the all - sufficient freedom and love to sustain that Liberation.

Faced with these wonderful facts of human life (charity, beauty, etc), evolutionary reductivists default to subjectivity, assume that our impressions of value are illusory and see moral reasoning as a sophisticated mechanism to get what we really want (a free decoder ring to anyone who, without laughing, can explain my Petco experience in these terms).

Ellison and I regarded ourselves as being the heirs and continuators of the most indigenous mythic prefigurations of the most fundamental existential assumption underlying the human proposition as stated in the Declaration of Independence... Yes, it would be the likes of him... and me... the grandchildren of slaves freed by the Civil War, betrayed by Reconstruction... who would strive in our stories to provide American literature with representative anecdotes, definitive episodes, and mythic profiles that would add up to a truly comprehensive and universally appealing American epic.

The story of women being easily possessed by demons to distort God's message is totally unbiblical and must be stopped.If it were so, the woman who was sent by Jesus to herald the first resurrection Gospel, would have distorted.Yet Bible says, this same Magdalene was freed from bondage to demons.Anything that brings fear and bondage isn't the Gospel.The reason why the word seems not to be gaining ascendancy in some parts of the world is because of the coldness of the human heart.To blame it entirely on women is unscriptural.

Aquinas was for them either a Pelagianizing theologian who relied too little on grace and left too much to human free will or a philosophical theologian who counted too heavily on human reason and too little on divine revelation.

And then there were bishops like Karol Wojtyła of Kraków, who grasped that the dignity of the human person was the battleground on which «the Church in the modern world» was contesting with various dangerous forces for the human future; who thought that coercion of consciences violated that human dignity; and who believed that the act of faith must be free if it is to be true, because the God of the Bible wants to be adored by people who freely choose to do so.

No; what makes one's pulse to bound when he remembers his own home under foreign skies, is never the rich man, nor the learned man, nor the distinguished man of any sort who - illustrates its history, for in all these petty products almost every country may favorably, at all events tediously, compete with our own; but it is all simply the abstract manhood itself of the country, man himself unqualified by convention, the man to whom all these conventional men have been simply introductory, the man who — let me say it — for the first time in human history finding himself in his own right the peer of every other man, spontaneously aspires and attains to a far freer and profounder culture of his nature than has ever yet illustrated humanity...

Some see Jesus as a very good man who preached love but had no supernatural origin, or as a man who understood human frailty and psychology and hence was able to free others of psychosomatic blindness, etc..

I have done, will do, and won't support anyone who does anything that blocks another free human being from living his or her life they way they wish.

But the claim that I had made, which Hasker quoted, was that the God of traditional free will theism could have created «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74).

It is especially puzzling why the deity of traditional free will theism, who created the universe for the sake of soul - building, would have taken over 10 billion years simply to set the stage, employing an evolutionary process involving hundreds of millions of years of animal suffering prior to the rise of human beings.

In a statement quoted by Hasker in his discussion of what he calls a «more subtle form» of the above argument (although it simply is my argument), I said that according to traditional free will theism it would have been possible for God to create «creatures who could enjoy all the same values which we human beings enjoy, except that they would not really be free» (Process 74).

And it is traditional free will theists who have implied, and sometimes explicitly said, that the whole universe was created for evoking moral and spiritual virtue in free human (and perhaps, on other planets, humanlike) souls, so that it is only this divine - human drama that contains intrinsic value.

Through the long centuries in which God was seeking to prepare the way for the «incarnation» — the coming in human flesh of Himself through the «Word,» the self - expression of Himself in the creation of the cosmos — He was seeking men who would willingly respond to «the light which lighteth every man» and slowly was finding some in the small minority of His «chosen people» who were struggling to understand what His Spirit, respecting their free will, was trying to say through them.

i guess we are lucky are parents were not gay or we would not all be here reading this the book allso says free will and ten comanments to live by its not up to us humans to judge when we all die we will know what we did right and what was wrong until then do what you do best to help keep the devil from taking over remember the devil and god have the same powers but only god can give you peace and love bottom line what or who you sleep with is your choice but don't keep rubbing my nose in it do your job and keep the rest to yourself

«There is real and genuine tolerance only when a man is firmly and absolutely convinced of a truth, or of what he holds to be a truth, and when he at the same time recognizes the right of those who deny this truth to exist, and to contradict him, and to speak their own mind, not because they are free from truth but because they seek truth in their own way, and because he respects in them human nature and human dignity and those very resources and living springs of the intellect and of conscience which make them potentially capable of attaining the truth he loves, if someday they happen to see it.

Verse 31:6 talks about those who preaches to take human away from worshipping One True God (pure monothiestic) and those who purchases their stories to be misguided are the same... the one who purchases these stories are not being forced but they are purchasing by their free wills that human will be judged for this «free will» that how they have used this «free will» when it comes to The Creator OR Creators...

IN PLURIMIS (On the Abolition of Slavery) Pope Leo XIII Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on 5 May 1888 The words of St. Gregory the Great are very applicable here: «Since our Redeemer, the Author of all life, deigned to take human flesh, that by the power of His Godhood the chains by which we were held in bondage being broken, He might restore us to our first state of liberty, it is most fitting that men by the concession of manumission should restore to the freedom in which they were born those whom nature sent free into the world, but who have been condemned to the yoke of slavery by the law of nations.»

Those who have not known this (and this is only knowable by God's grace, his free gift of revealing his love to us), have not known what is mostly deeply human about them.

Some contemporary writers suggest that the future is not predetermined but dependent on human beings who are free to respond to God's will or to bring upon themselves self - destruction.

We then join this God in the act of loving and freeing those who are in the chains and bonds and shackles of human corruption.

I have hit a spot of stagnation due to moving (something I didn't foresee between a giveaway and school), but realizing that this milkshake was just too good not to share, I developed the super human «gift» tonight to tell you not only who won the Bob's Red Mill gluten free cookbook + the goodie pack giveaway, but also to share with you a recipe that I have admittedly held out on for some time.

Another supporter is Al Gore who stated that initiatives like Meat Free Monday «represent a responsible and welcome component of a comprehensive strategy for reducing global warming pollution and simultaneously improving human health.»

This can be compared to humans with coeliac disease perhaps, or those who simply have a gluten allergy, and in that case, a diet free of gluten is commenced.

I am not a vegan warrior, I am a meat and dairy - free human who still remembers how yummy that stuff is and reminds herself regularly — I love the animals more.

And who knows how bad the Hurricanes might have thrashed Notre Dame if they hadn't made seven turnovers — three interceptions, one of which was returned 60 yards for a TD by free safety Pat Terrell, and four fumbles, two of which were recovered by Irish nosetackle Chris Zorich, the human groundhog.