Sentences with phrase «free interpretation of»

Matthew Darbyshire is taking over the Salon, providing visitors with a space of relaxation and discovery; Otto Berchem questions visitors about the Frac's collection; Rainier Lericolais invites them on an audio promenade between the LAAC and the Frac, a veritable poetic ramble and free interpretation of the region's history; and Angela Bulloch uses the wind to light up the AP2 hangar.

Vivid free interpretation of situations, objects, figures and a complex sign language in pop culture and extended cultural exchanges as they move through historical motifs and compositions, posing notions of an expressive self, this is the general starting point for the artistic work of Korean artist Sinae Yoo (* 1985).

Modern Combat is back in its fifth installment, a free interpretation of Call of Duty for tablets and smartphones.

Essay writing is a prosaic composition with a free interpretation of a problem.

Is my free interpretation of the Valentino Resort collection was a bit «too free»?

This also includes a very free interpretation of the third chapter of Genesis.

The posters he created are free interpretations of those movies that broaden the formal knowledge of one of the most important artists of our time.

Not exact matches

China president Xi Jinping is expected to present «the most authoritative interpretation» on China's 40 years of economic reforms and opening up as part of h's keynote speech, as well as announce the establishment of free - trade ports in Chinese provinces potentially including Hainan.

It's no wonder then that rules of origin are frequently open to interpretation in free trade negotiations.

If we free the Supreme Court from its bondage to a strict legal interpretation of the Constitution and those values articulated in that document, then the Court has lost its lawful authority to speak and we have lost our legal obligation to listen.

I would suggest that like anyone else, you are a free to make your own «interpretations of events, concerning your personal thoughts of your God» i.e..

The brochure for the latter states that it is open to the free exercise of scholarship in the interpretation of the Qur «an and invites non-Muslims to share in the debate.

Hence, only the first interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).

In dealing with the problem, they made free use of an allegorical method of interpretation, which was a legacy from ancient Greek scholarship.

The plea is to «break free» from a fundamentalist interpretation of the bible, which is a moralistic, ahistorical hermeneutic that bows to the authority of the «written word» (bibliolatry) more faithfully than to the Christ Jesus, the Living Word of God.

This difficulty lay like a great sorrow upon all theologians whose last norm of belief was nothing more certain than private interpretation of the Bible, and while it broke the faith of some, it serves also, paradox though it may seem, to explain how it was that so many non-Catholic exegetes found it easy to strip themselves of theological vesture and to plunge wildly with the higher critics into the maelstrom of that speculative free - for - all and devaluation of Christian dogma which followed.

However well - intentioned, the arguments of the restoration advocates are usually grounded in an epistemological skepticism that is alien to normal constitutional interpretation and harmful to the political morality on which free government is based.

Whatever the detailed provisions, however, they are not democratic unless they allow the political association to maximize the measure in which the taking, interpretation, and enforcement of political decisions is effected through full and free discourse.

If one lets the no - inherent - free - will interpretation of the less than 0.5 % of the Scriptures set the precedence on what the word of God says about man's free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning / interpretation of the majority of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.

But the Jacob stories emphasize a central point of interpretation: Israel's election is understood not as merited or earned, but as the free choice of Yahweh, for reasons known only to himself.

This, in my estimation, is the primary contribution of a process hermeneutic: that it draws our attention to the functional significance of the metaphysical lure while freeing interpretation from the strict logic of proximate lures.

You came by this so - called truth arbitrarily (if you did not, please feel free to explain how you evaluated thousands of interpretations against one another and managed to discern which one was the real truth), and then YOU PRESUME TO JUDGE OTHERS based on a «truth» you arrived at arbitrarily.

In Paul's interpretation of the events, there is only unity in the gospel, which is both revealed and circumcision - free.

His program of a thoroughgoing interpretation of the Christian message under the rubrics of history and eschatology looked like another interpretive tour de force, another exercise in killing the Oedipal father (or fathers, in the form of Barth and Bultmann) so that the children are free to pursue their own projects.

To commit one's time and energies, and his best interpretations and arguments, to decision in which others share must inevitably be an anxiety - inducing business unless one has a bit of a psychological free - swing about him.

We have read the free exercise claims and arguments put forward by the prochoice lawyers in the current wave of litigation, and in our judgment, these claims would not be meritorious under even the most generous interpretation of free exercise rights under RFRA.

The mind can and does provide justification for anything it chooses to, typically through selective out - of - context quoting and creative interpretation (innovation), and each mind is free to make its own choices.

Since the Bible is written in androcentric, grammatically masculine language that can function as generic inclusive or as patriarchal exclusive language, feminist interpretation must develop a hermeneutics of critical evaluation for proclamation that is able to assess theologically whether scriptural texts function to inculcate patriarchal values, or whether they must be read against their linguistic «androcentric grain» in order to set free their liberating vision for today and for the future.

In the end he plainly allows the interpretation that the free will is preeminent in the moral architecture of the self.

This oral tradition was supposed to have been inspired on Mt. Sinai together with the written law, though it often actually adjusted the requirements of the ancient laws to new circumstances and customs by rather free interpretations.

As secretary of the Cambridge University Free Trade Association, he wrote in 1923: «We must hold to free trade, in its widest interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with usFree Trade Association, he wrote in 1923: «We must hold to free trade, in its widest interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with usfree trade, in its widest interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with us....

Gospels and epistles alike offer a field of study in which the labour of criticism and interpretation may initiate us into the «many - sided wisdom «which was contained in the apostolic Preaching, and make us free to declare it in contemporary terms to our own age.

It is incipiently rational, because its attention is directed to data supplied by the receptive consciousness, and insofar as the reflective consciousness becomes free from the dominance of the unconscious, these data must play a larger and more direct role in their own interpretation.

With a subjective interpretation and adjudication of such cases, we need reassurance that such would not restrict the free exercise of religion for our chaplains and military personnel.

If the left insists on the liberal interpretation of our constitutional and political institutions in an uncompromising effort to defend the ever - expanding role of the state to secure the practical liberty of individuals, the right defends the free - market system and uncompromisingly rejects any restraint on the unfettered economic choices of individuals.

Its immediate effect was to leave Paul and those who shared his view free to continue the Gentile mission with the support of the leaders of the Jerusalem church, but with an interpretation of Jesus» life and teaching different in some important respects from their own (cf. Chap.

The Calvinists on the other hand have their particular bias, precedence, of man having no inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their ideas of unconditional election and irresistible grace.

The Arminians have their particular bias, precedence, that initially fallen man did not have inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their idea of universal prevenient grace that gave all of fallen mankind a free will capacity (at some time after the fall) to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts.

My interest in Barth as moral theologian suggests to me that his interpretation of the Reformed tradition (as equally concerned with God's glory and the free action of creatures) was deeply important in his theological growth.

In the third paragraph I, upfront, indicated my bias as to what I believe is the Biblical precedence which is that fallen mankind has the inherent - free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts which biased my interpretation of John 6:25 - 71 — and my interpretation indicates that section of Scripture can be understood (interpreted) to be consistent with the precedence I mentioned.

Members of davidhayward.ca... I'm doing a one hour Webinar today, FREE to members, on «Dream Interpretation 101».

Third, the implementation of free trade policies based on the idea that specialization furthers growth and appeal to fallacious interpretations of the principle of comparative advantage have left large portions of the Third World unable to feed themselves.

It is the Reason of Plato at work, freeing us from old, stale habits of thought in the expectation that out of the resulting conversation, from the very turmoil and confusion of interpretations at war with one another, can emerge in good time a better understanding and a better practice of what it is to become and be within human communities.

Biblical scholar Paul Hanson writes, «Perhaps the best way to begin to understand shalom is to recognize that it describes the realm where chaos is not allowed to enter, and where life can be fostered free from the fear of all which diminishes and destroys» («War and Peace in the Hebrew Bible,» Interpretation, vol.

I won't waste time posting Jefferson / Madison quotes, but simply refer to the Establishment Clause, Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists and Reynolds v U.S. (1878) which referencing the Jefferson letter's «separation» language in interpretation of the Establishment / Free Exercise clauses states: «Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader of the advocates of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured.»

And since we are not burdened with the need to come up with one good interpretation that incorporates all of these — as is the literalist — we are free to choose for ourselves the one which best helps us to understand Jesus and to respond to his message.

Is it evidence of a shortcoming of Scalia's interpretation of the Free Exercise Clause?

It depends on your denomination and interpretation of complicated theological topics like predestination and free will.

We are now free to explore this meaning without being restricted to a particular concept or interpretation which because of our pre-suppositions, we think the word «resurrection» must possess.

[2] One canget a glimpse of how far this can go in some of the more extreme interpretations of Maximus the Confessor, in which it is suggested that, without the fall, the Incarnation would not have taken place in the person of Jesus, but in a «universal» incarnation in human nature through man's free co-operation with divine grace.