The posters he created are
free interpretations of those movies that broaden the formal knowledge of one of the most important artists of our time.
This also includes a very
free interpretation of the third chapter of Genesis.
Is
my free interpretation of the Valentino Resort collection was a bit «too free»?
Essay writing is a prosaic composition with
a free interpretation of a problem.
Modern Combat is back in its fifth installment,
a free interpretation of Call of Duty for tablets and smartphones.
Vivid
free interpretation of situations, objects, figures and a complex sign language in pop culture and extended cultural exchanges as they move through historical motifs and compositions, posing notions of an expressive self, this is the general starting point for the artistic work of Korean artist Sinae Yoo (* 1985).
Matthew Darbyshire is taking over the Salon, providing visitors with a space of relaxation and discovery; Otto Berchem questions visitors about the Frac's collection; Rainier Lericolais invites them on an audio promenade between the LAAC and the Frac, a veritable poetic ramble and
free interpretation of the region's history; and Angela Bulloch uses the wind to light up the AP2 hangar.
Not exact matches
China president Xi Jinping is expected to present «the most authoritative
interpretation» on China's 40 years
of economic reforms and opening up as part
of h's keynote speech, as well as announce the establishment
of free - trade ports in Chinese provinces potentially including Hainan.
It's no wonder then that rules
of origin are frequently open to
interpretation in
free trade negotiations.
If we
free the Supreme Court from its bondage to a strict legal
interpretation of the Constitution and those values articulated in that document, then the Court has lost its lawful authority to speak and we have lost our legal obligation to listen.
I would suggest that like anyone else, you are a
free to make your own «
interpretations of events, concerning your personal thoughts
of your God» i.e..
The brochure for the latter states that it is open to the
free exercise
of scholarship in the
interpretation of the Qur «an and invites non-Muslims to share in the debate.
Hence, only the first
interpretation is meaningful, and it can not be used to deduce from the existence
of (genuine) moral evil the nonexistence
of benevolent omnipotence, since «whether the
free men created by God would always do what is right would presumably be up to them» (GPE 271).
In dealing with the problem, they made
free use
of an allegorical method
of interpretation, which was a legacy from ancient Greek scholarship.
The plea is to «break
free» from a fundamentalist
interpretation of the bible, which is a moralistic, ahistorical hermeneutic that bows to the authority
of the «written word» (bibliolatry) more faithfully than to the Christ Jesus, the Living Word
of God.
This difficulty lay like a great sorrow upon all theologians whose last norm
of belief was nothing more certain than private
interpretation of the Bible, and while it broke the faith
of some, it serves also, paradox though it may seem, to explain how it was that so many non-Catholic exegetes found it easy to strip themselves
of theological vesture and to plunge wildly with the higher critics into the maelstrom
of that speculative
free - for - all and devaluation
of Christian dogma which followed.
However well - intentioned, the arguments
of the restoration advocates are usually grounded in an epistemological skepticism that is alien to normal constitutional
interpretation and harmful to the political morality on which
free government is based.
Whatever the detailed provisions, however, they are not democratic unless they allow the political association to maximize the measure in which the taking,
interpretation, and enforcement
of political decisions is effected through full and
free discourse.
If one lets the no - inherent -
free - will
interpretation of the less than 0.5 %
of the Scriptures set the precedence on what the word
of God says about man's
free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning /
interpretation of the majority
of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.
But the Jacob stories emphasize a central point
of interpretation: Israel's election is understood not as merited or earned, but as the
free choice
of Yahweh, for reasons known only to himself.
This, in my estimation, is the primary contribution
of a process hermeneutic: that it draws our attention to the functional significance
of the metaphysical lure while
freeing interpretation from the strict logic
of proximate lures.
You came by this so - called truth arbitrarily (if you did not, please feel
free to explain how you evaluated thousands
of interpretations against one another and managed to discern which one was the real truth), and then YOU PRESUME TO JUDGE OTHERS based on a «truth» you arrived at arbitrarily.
In Paul's
interpretation of the events, there is only unity in the gospel, which is both revealed and circumcision -
free.
His program
of a thoroughgoing
interpretation of the Christian message under the rubrics
of history and eschatology looked like another interpretive tour de force, another exercise in killing the Oedipal father (or fathers, in the form
of Barth and Bultmann) so that the children are
free to pursue their own projects.
To commit one's time and energies, and his best
interpretations and arguments, to decision in which others share must inevitably be an anxiety - inducing business unless one has a bit
of a psychological
free - swing about him.
We have read the
free exercise claims and arguments put forward by the prochoice lawyers in the current wave
of litigation, and in our judgment, these claims would not be meritorious under even the most generous
interpretation of free exercise rights under RFRA.
The mind can and does provide justification for anything it chooses to, typically through selective out -
of - context quoting and creative
interpretation (innovation), and each mind is
free to make its own choices.
Since the Bible is written in androcentric, grammatically masculine language that can function as generic inclusive or as patriarchal exclusive language, feminist
interpretation must develop a hermeneutics
of critical evaluation for proclamation that is able to assess theologically whether scriptural texts function to inculcate patriarchal values, or whether they must be read against their linguistic «androcentric grain» in order to set
free their liberating vision for today and for the future.
In the end he plainly allows the
interpretation that the
free will is preeminent in the moral architecture
of the self.
This oral tradition was supposed to have been inspired on Mt. Sinai together with the written law, though it often actually adjusted the requirements
of the ancient laws to new circumstances and customs by rather
free interpretations.
As secretary
of the Cambridge University
Free Trade Association, he wrote in 1923: «We must hold to free trade, in its widest interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with us
Free Trade Association, he wrote in 1923: «We must hold to
free trade, in its widest interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with us
free trade, in its widest
interpretation, as an inflexible dogma, to which no exception is admitted, wherever the decision rests with us....
Gospels and epistles alike offer a field
of study in which the labour
of criticism and
interpretation may initiate us into the «many - sided wisdom «which was contained in the apostolic Preaching, and make us
free to declare it in contemporary terms to our own age.
It is incipiently rational, because its attention is directed to data supplied by the receptive consciousness, and insofar as the reflective consciousness becomes
free from the dominance
of the unconscious, these data must play a larger and more direct role in their own
interpretation.
With a subjective
interpretation and adjudication
of such cases, we need reassurance that such would not restrict the
free exercise
of religion for our chaplains and military personnel.
If the left insists on the liberal
interpretation of our constitutional and political institutions in an uncompromising effort to defend the ever - expanding role
of the state to secure the practical liberty
of individuals, the right defends the
free - market system and uncompromisingly rejects any restraint on the unfettered economic choices
of individuals.
Its immediate effect was to leave Paul and those who shared his view
free to continue the Gentile mission with the support
of the leaders
of the Jerusalem church, but with an
interpretation of Jesus» life and teaching different in some important respects from their own (cf. Chap.
The Calvinists on the other hand have their particular bias, precedence,
of man having no inherent -
free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which
interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their ideas
of unconditional election and irresistible grace.
The Arminians have their particular bias, precedence, that initially fallen man did not have inherent -
free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts that they interpret John 6:25 - 71 with — which
interpretation is consistent with their precedence and consistent with their idea
of universal prevenient grace that gave all
of fallen mankind a
free will capacity (at some time after the fall) to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts.
My interest in Barth as moral theologian suggests to me that his
interpretation of the Reformed tradition (as equally concerned with God's glory and the
free action
of creatures) was deeply important in his theological growth.
In the third paragraph I, upfront, indicated my bias as to what I believe is the Biblical precedence which is that fallen mankind has the inherent -
free - will capacity to accept or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, teachings, promises and gifts which biased my
interpretation of John 6:25 - 71 — and my
interpretation indicates that section
of Scripture can be understood (interpreted) to be consistent with the precedence I mentioned.
Members
of davidhayward.ca... I'm doing a one hour Webinar today,
FREE to members, on «Dream
Interpretation 101».
Third, the implementation
of free trade policies based on the idea that specialization furthers growth and appeal to fallacious
interpretations of the principle
of comparative advantage have left large portions
of the Third World unable to feed themselves.
It is the Reason
of Plato at work,
freeing us from old, stale habits
of thought in the expectation that out
of the resulting conversation, from the very turmoil and confusion
of interpretations at war with one another, can emerge in good time a better understanding and a better practice
of what it is to become and be within human communities.
Biblical scholar Paul Hanson writes, «Perhaps the best way to begin to understand shalom is to recognize that it describes the realm where chaos is not allowed to enter, and where life can be fostered
free from the fear
of all which diminishes and destroys» («War and Peace in the Hebrew Bible,»
Interpretation, vol.
I won't waste time posting Jefferson / Madison quotes, but simply refer to the Establishment Clause, Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists and Reynolds v U.S. (1878) which referencing the Jefferson letter's «separation» language in
interpretation of the Establishment /
Free Exercise clauses states: «Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader
of the advocates
of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration
of the scope and effect
of the amendment thus secured.»
And since we are not burdened with the need to come up with one good
interpretation that incorporates all
of these — as is the literalist — we are
free to choose for ourselves the one which best helps us to understand Jesus and to respond to his message.
Is it evidence
of a shortcoming
of Scalia's
interpretation of the
Free Exercise Clause?
It depends on your denomination and
interpretation of complicated theological topics like predestination and
free will.
We are now
free to explore this meaning without being restricted to a particular concept or
interpretation which because
of our pre-suppositions, we think the word «resurrection» must possess.
[2] One canget a glimpse
of how far this can go in some
of the more extreme
interpretations of Maximus the Confessor, in which it is suggested that, without the fall, the Incarnation would not have taken place in the person
of Jesus, but in a «universal» incarnation in human nature through man's
free co-operation with divine grace.