Metev prefers preceding his characters and shows their stride and movement with a shot reverse shot that becomes the ideal tool to seize the different dynamics of language, in particular
the free language of youth and its catchphrases, onomatopoeias, verses, repetitions and provocations.
Not exact matches
And as a champion
of globalisation,
free trade and multilateralism, it will have strong support from the international community», the English -
language newspaper added.
In latin, Carolus is a strong form
of the pronoun «he» and translates in many related
languages as a «
free or strong» man.
You'd think that investors would be among the most cold - blooded and rational consumers
of information — after all, fortunes depend on them making bias -
free judgments about what they hear on earnings calls — but according to this new research, they are actually highly swayed by one tiny shift in
language, just like everyone.
And as a champion
of globalization,
free trade and multilateralism, it will have strong support from the international community,» the English -
language paper added.
There are also tons
of other
free resources online, including GitHub's 500
free programming books that cover more than 80 different programming
languages.
(1) To address the coding skills gap and help prepare more people for jobs in software development, Apple created a powerful yet easy - to - learn coding
language called Swift (TM), the
free Swift Playgrounds (TM) app and a
free curriculum, App Development with Swift, which are available to anyone and are already being used by millions
of students at K - 12 schools, summer camps and leading community colleges across the country.
«Xi Jinping has used very strong
language in favor
of globalization, in favor
of freer trade.
The app centers around a colorful feed, which Reddy also says has a combination
of AI (natural
language processing also analyzes every post) and human moderation to make sure that users retain their
free speech but don't engage in targeted harassment and other negativity.
Previously, she was at Duolingo bringing
free language education to millions
of people around the world.
In September, Roskomnadzor warned CNN International over alleged violations
of Russian media law.101 In October, the Ministry
of Justice warned Radio Svoboda and Nastoyashcheye Vremya — the Russian -
language outlets
of U.S. - funded Radio
Free Europe / Radio Liberty (RFE / RL)-- about the possibility
of being designated as foreign agents.102 These warnings were apparently aimed at preparing a legal basis for countermeasures if the United States required Kremlin mouthpieces RT and Sputnik to register as foreign agents under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA).
• Clients and non-clients alike may download my
free 90 - page directory
of job search / networking groups throughout NY, NJ, PA, and CT. • To provide the greatest possible reach, I have communication skills in five (5) different
languages and offer unlimited e-mail & phone support.
Offering five customized courses, Skillcrush also offers a
free 10 - day tech bootcamp to get people familiar with the
language and expectations
of a career in the tech world.
They include «rules
of origin,» or the percentage
of parts that must be made in North America for a product to qualify for
free - trade status;
language on how to settle disputes affecting foreign investors; changing Mexican labor standards; and Trump's stated goal
of reducing U.S. bilateral trade deficits.
And in some instances, it has been Scalia and Thomas who have done so more than those who may think
of themselves less as originalists (in one recent case in particular Scalia and Thomas dissented from the majority which held that convicted child molesters could be indefinitely imprisoned despite having fully served their sentences based on subtle shifts
of language and the over-application
of prior case law — no one wants a child molester
free and about, but such results focused outcomes are always dangerous).
I would point out, however, that the actual
language of the Bill
of Rights says, «Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment
of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.»
Pretty strong
language, but no stronger than the metaphor Daniel Mitchell
of the Heritage Foundation used, in an op - ed article in The Washington Times, to «describe a bill designed to prevent corporations from rechartering abroad for tax purposes: Mitchell described this legislation as the «Dred Scott tax bill,» referring to the infamous 1857 Supreme Court ruling that required
free states to return escaped slaves.
The writer who goes under this name has left us some
of the most magnificent poetry in the Bible — poetry which is largely
free from the archaic obscurity
of some
of the earlier prophets, and can be enjoyed for the power and range
of its imagery and its richly embroidered
language, as well as for the sublimity
of its thought, which touches, probably, the highest level reached anywhere in the Old Testament.
Clapping trees, quaking mountains, hearts
of stone exchanged for hearts
of flesh, swords beaten into plowshares and spears into pruning hooks — this is the colorful
language of prophecy, which simultaneously comforts and disturbs, frightens and
frees.
The
Language of God by francis s. collins
free press, 304 pages, $ 26 «Today we are learning the
language in which God created life.»
It should be noted that throughout this book we have assiduously pursued the use
of gender -
free language in speaking
of God.
Religious
language is
of a paradoxical nature, as when it is said that Christ is both God and man, that the Christian is at once
free and unfree, already born and yet unborn, etc..
human beings, «born
free and equal in dignity and rights,» are entitled to human rights «without distinction
of any kind, such as race, color, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status.
The communicative enterprise would become a vast inductive project — a complex exercise in theory - building, leading tentatively and provisionally toward something which, in fact, the imputational groundwork
of our
language enables us to presuppose from the very outset.1 Only by using the resources
of thought to
free our communicative resources from the spatio - temporal processes
of their employment can we manage to communicate with one another across the reaches
of space and time.
Taken to extremes, it results in treating all words for God as
free - floating metaphors pointing at a deity beyond all determinate
language, which can be named in any way that expresses the depths
of human experience.
Since the Bible is written in androcentric, grammatically masculine
language that can function as generic inclusive or as patriarchal exclusive
language, feminist interpretation must develop a hermeneutics
of critical evaluation for proclamation that is able to assess theologically whether scriptural texts function to inculcate patriarchal values, or whether they must be read against their linguistic «androcentric grain» in order to set
free their liberating vision for today and for the future.
They speak the silent, miraculous
language of grace — the
language that invites us, in rhythms deeper than words, to be buried, united,
freed.
You can say whatever you want to... Al Quran teaches that God created human in different nationality, ethnicity,
language so that one can interact with other and then HE gave
free will to every single one
of the human... and every one
of us will be held accountable for the using
of this «
free will»....
In our generation there is danger and hope — danger that these noncognitive accouterments will lose their aesthetic harmony and hypnotic power when integrated with the basic prehensions
of science, and be reverted into impotent and empty symbols, jarring, ugly, and without force in final satisfactions: hope that the power
of Jesus as lure will reassert itself in an aesthetic context devoid
of supernaturalism, a context such that (the
language now picks up echoes
of van Buren) the vision
of Jesus, the
free man,
free from authority,
free from fear, «
free to give himself to others, whoever they were «1 — such that this vision in its earthly, human purity will lure our aims to a harmonious concrescence, integrating scientific insight and moral vision and producing a modern, intensely fulfilling human satisfaction.
The intense experience
of the personal encounter with God is expressed in
free and open emotional
language that satisfies the quest for spirituality and enriches religious expression and popular culture.
While classification
freed directors to use explicit
language in marvelous films like Platoon and Something Wild and has allowed films like Out
of Africa and Children
of a Lesser God to explore the complex nature
of human sexuality, it has also given us a series
of slasher films — Friday the 13th, with its many parts; The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, parts one and two — and films like Brian DePalma's artistically significant but deplorably explicit Body Double.
The beauty came from elsewhere as a
free gift, in the
language of worship and Scripture chosen in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
To be
free of ideological captivity is to «join the community
of struggle,» to oppose racism and sexism, to fight for human rights and women's ordination, to engage in social action, to envision «holiness as justice,» and to develop nonsexist
language and imagery in order to «empower» and
free the congregation to engage in the «struggle for liberation.»
One can claim or believe himself to be
free because
of language.
But he says this symbolism is «adherent,, rather than being a true act
of language (a true act
of language being, for example, the metaphor, which is a
free invention
of speech).
Biblical
language might
free us from some
of these limitations if we were capable
of thinking in such images, but we have become too literal in our thinking.
«These habits [
of language], stored in these mechanisms... can hold other motor habits in check, and thereby, in overcoming automatism, set consciousness
free» (CE 201).
I won't waste time posting Jefferson / Madison quotes, but simply refer to the Establishment Clause, Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptists and Reynolds v U.S. (1878) which referencing the Jefferson letter's «separation»
language in interpretation
of the Establishment /
Free Exercise clauses states: «Coming as this does from an acknowledged leader
of the advocates
of the measure, it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration
of the scope and effect
of the amendment thus secured.»
Barth insisted that Christian theology can be healthy and
free only if it remains open to a multiplicity
of philosophies, worldviews and forms
of language.
The songs and stories sung about him attribute to him omniscience, the judgment
of children's behavior, and the
free dispensing
of gifts — all sung in the
language of faith.
Meanwhile the USA countered the Taliban propaganda with its own campaign through the use
of Middle Eastern media, besides dropping pamphlets from the air in Afghanistan and creating Radio
Free Afghanistan, broadcasting American news and entertainment to Afghans in their local
languages.
It is also
free of traditional religious
language and images.
To be sure, there is a «
free flow»
of TV — a
free - flowing, endless outpouring
of sitcoms, music - TV, game shows and commercials, none
of which were chosen by the people
of the Caribbean, and none
of which support their own customs, stories, and values — their own «
language.»
In theological terms, God's choice
of language as the basis
of his contact with humanity signifies that we are
free to respond — or to ignore him if we choose.
Such
language makes sense only if we assume that «the original principles in human nature» are seen to be good, that traces
of a «common humanity» remain, that humans have genuine
free will, and that intentional deviation by individuals from what is natural is culpable.
We are now
free to undermine the accumulated prejudices
of our
languages and allow each individual to construct his or her own world on no other basis than preference and desire.
The ideal
of the media meta -
language, let us call it mediaspeak, is to come as close as possible to a transcultural, a-historical, assumption
free Esperanto, that evokes no particular heritage or tradition.
Questions such as whether the
language of «faith» has any authority in a scientific age, or whether mind and life are reducible to atoms and molecules, whether only the tangible is real, whether the human person is anything more than a complex physico - chemical mechanism, whether we are
free or determined, whether there is any «objective» truth to the symbols and myths
of religion — all
of these questions are asked at all only because what is fundamentally at issue is whether there is an ultimate context that gives meaning to cosmic process and significance to our lives in this process.
The uniqueness
of Man is shown by the fact that there is no real intellect in the animals — even the higher apes show no propensity for learning other
languages, for mathematics, science or art; nor do animals show evidence
of free will — they are completely constrained by the material environment and by instinct.
the
language of free choice is in many verses as well.