Sentences with phrase «free law movement»

Consequently, the work of the Free Law movement can not stop with making opinions freely available: a free and robust citator is also needed.

He hails from the innovation hub of Stanford Law School and is advancing next - generation methods of graphical legal research, as well as advocating for the free law movement.

While this is true (old law can be bad law) the «up - to - date» mantra is usually interpreted as dependence on insanely expensive looseleaf texts, a publishing format that has dominated in Canada for decades but was long - ago superseded by advances in information technologies and social media as well as the free law movement.

They should not presume to present themselves as a Canadian standard unless they work within the free law movement.

[This is the first of a two - part column on open access and public access to Canadian legal scholarship within the free law movement.

Not exact matches

Le Pen is campaigning for a wholesale renegotiation of the EU's treaties, restoring the primacy of national law, declawing the European Central Bank, ending free movement, and effectively killing the Single Market.

One major catalyst for the referendum was U.K. citizens» fears that high immigration was fueled by the right to free movement of people throughout the EU, which is entrenched in European law.

And Chile is looking to continue to push the movement with the recent passing of a law, allowing companies to incorporate in one day online for free.

Among them are life, liberty, security of person, freedom from slavery and from torture and inhumane treatment; equality before the law; the right to judicial remedies for wrongs; freedom from arbitrary arrest and detention; fair trials and due process of law, including the presumption of innocence; privacy; freedom of movement; equal rights in marriage; freedoms of speech, press, assembly and association; and free elections.

He did not merely copy Democritus» physics, as was commonly thought, but introduced the idea of spontaneity into the movement of the atoms, and to the Democritus world of inanimate nature ruled by mechanical laws he added a world of animate nature in which the human will operated.9 Marx thus favours the views of Epicurus for two reasons: firstly, his emphasis on absolute autonomy of the human spirit has freed human beings from all superstitions of transcendent objects; secondly, the emphasis on «free individual self - consciousness» shows one way of going beyond the system of a «total philosophy».

You did a good job with this topic although as a member of the Hebrew Roots movement, I would disagree with you on being free from the law.

However, the EU said the law is «a restriction on the free movement of goods, as milk powder and concentrated milk are used extensively in Europe».

The law, signed by President Obama on Monday, will add 6 cents to school lunch reimbursements and will expand eligibility for free and reduced - price lunches for kids — not as much as lunch - reform supporters hoped for, but still hailed as a victory by many in the movement.

Germans can't take their US husband or wife to Germany, French can't take their US husband or wife to France, Romanians can't take their US husband or wife to Romania, at least based on EU free movement law.

But with Cameron powerless to act in the event of a larger - than - expected migration (EU law guarantees the free movement of people), UKIP has every incentive to maximise the PM's discomfort.

Mrs May has announced her priorities, and it is easy to infer what pressures create them — no contribution to the EU for access to the single market; no jurisdiction for the Court of Justice of the European Union; no free movement; and British laws being made in Parliament.

Leavers will still be signed up to a close relationship with it in which they must accept free movement and a lot of EU law.

This means updating European laws as they are passed, albeit with no say in them, European Court of Justice (ECJ) jurisdiction and, yes, free movement, although May promised a registration system for new EU arrivals similar to that already used in many continental states.

But Agbaje expressed reservation on the portion of the Ekiti law that places restriction on the free movement of herdsmen.

David Cameron has suffered a blow to his EU reform plans after the outgoing president of the European commission, José Manuel Barroso, said an arbitrary cap on free movement within the EU would be incompatible with European law.

After all, the spirit of free movement law seems to be that the right to residence is not solely the reward for meritorious behavior; it is supposed to protect even those individuals who are no model citizens, as is for example expressed in the decision Orfanopoulos.

«to take the opportunity afforded by these two references to give clear and structured guidance as to the circumstances in which the third country national family member of an EU citizen who is residing in his home Member State but who is exercising his rights of free movement can claim a derived right of residence in the home Member State under EU law.»

In particular, according to the European Commission's guidance, the concept of dependence in case of family members of third - country nationals should be interpreted with reference to the analogous concept in EU free movement law.

On 16 January 2014, the CJEU ruled on case Reyes regarding dependent family members in the EU free movement law.

After this primer in EEA law, we turn now to today's free movement of goods decision that came down today.

Indeed, individual rights under EU free movement law have been uncertain.

In a first case, C - 431 / 11 UK v Council, the CJEU dealt with the choice of legal basis for a measure implementing an European Economic Area (EEA) Agreement as regards social security systems and ruled that it was precisely one of the measures by which the law governing the EU internal market is to be extended as far as possible to the EEA, with the result that nationals of the EEA States concerned benefit from the free movement of persons under the same social conditions as EU citizens.

The cool thing about this movement to put free law on the Internet is how groups like Cornell and AltLaw have joined with commercial legal providers like Justia and Fastcase and Internet nonprofits like CC, Public.Resource, and the Internet Archive... accessible law on the Internet seems like an idea whose time has come.

It is noteworthy that the Government's plans for the Immigration Bill are described as «allowing for» the repeal of EU law on immigration, including free movement, that would otherwise be incorporated into UK law by the Repeal Bill.

Back to our turf, in 2002 at the Law via the Internet conference in Montreal the LII movement adopted the Montreal Declaration on Free Access to Law.

Second, the study is instructive due to its comprehensiveness with regard to the fields it covers, which range from free movement, citizenship, competition and state aid law to the directives on Services, Public Procurement and Transparency as well as to the sector - specific regulatory regimes.

At the same time the law on public services is under the influence of a whole range of EU law provisions and regimes: namely the rules on free movement, competition law and state aid, general and sector - specific primary law provisions, horizontal rules of secondary law, as well as a large body of sector - specific secondary EU law, which has increased substantially over the past few years.

At the vanguard of this movement is free - access advocate Carl Malamud's Law.gov, which is convening a series of workshops and symposiums at law schools throughout the country, assisted by some of the nation's top legal academics.

With a passion and dedication to the free and open source software movement she set up the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) in 2010, with the aim of protecting the rights of internet users and software providers in this rapidly moving sphere.

Further, the privatization of regulation would represent a significant step backwards in a nation - and world - wide movement to establish free access to law and legal information.

The proper solution would be public free access, available to everyone, on the LII model within the free access to law movement.

Let's try to compare the point 50 of the opinion: «While the movement of citizens of the Union between Member States is governed by EU law, and in particular by Article 21 TFEU and Directive 2004/38, the same does not apply to visits to Member States by Heads of State» which basically says that the movement of diplomats falls outside the scope of EU law, with the judgment of the Court in paragraph 51: «Accordingly, the fact that a Union citizen performs the duties of a Head of State is such as to justify a limitation, based on international law, on the exercise of the right of free movement conferred on that person by Article 21 TFEU.».

The international law obligation would then neatly be fitted into the free movement framework / criteria as a «normal / regular» justification ground.

Nevertheless, the CJEU uses that same international law to interpret the limitations allowed to restrict the free movement of EU - citizens.

Nevertheless, Pelckmans does prompt us to reflect afresh on some important open questions concerning the outer limits of EU free movement law and the Court's particular role in setting those boundaries.

this concept of free public access to law has grown to 22 organizations world - wide; I was pleasantly surprised to learn of movements in Africa, South America, and Europe;

there is a new desire in the free public access to law movement to include not just primary materials of legislation and case law, but also secondary materials such as treatises and law journal articles (or doctrine) in the systems.

I think this is a fabulous opportunity for Canadian legal information professionals to get more involved in the free access to law movement.

The two contributions on the case - law regarding the internal market both investigate the Court's fine - tuning of the Treaties» free movement provisions, but their «plan of attack» differs considerably.

Otherwise, any national technical regulation or specification which «may create obstacles to the free movement of goods within the internal market», as referred to by Directive (EU) 2015/1535 (see Article 6), might be referred to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling by a national judge, contrary to the current case - law already referred to above delimitating the scope of Article 267 TFEU to EU provisions and excluding national ones.

IDRC hopes to deliver an indicator - based framework that will assist Law Societies and other stakeholders involved in the free access to law movement worldwide in measuring the outcome of their efforLaw Societies and other stakeholders involved in the free access to law movement worldwide in measuring the outcome of their efforlaw movement worldwide in measuring the outcome of their efforts.

With regard to the first manifestation, Snell concludes that the judgments on free movement law are insufficiently reasoned and inconsistent (pp. 116 - 117).

51 Accordingly, the fact that a Union citizen performs the duties of a Head of State is such as to justify a limitation, based on international law, on the exercise of the right of free movement conferred on that person by Article 21 TFEU.

A limitation of the free movement of EU - citizen diplomats would then only be allowed when there is an actual and present danger to their security which therefore can not be guaranteed (with an analogy to its case - law on infringements to free movement by expulsion, which is only allowed if the personal conduct of the EU - citizen forms a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society., cf. the Orfanopoulos - case, par.

This argument was not made by any of the parties in this case and the Advocate - General used the international law argument to conclude that EU - law was not applicable at all, whereas the CJEU — in my view — stays quite cryptic about how to fit in the interplay between EU - law and international law in its framework / criteria of judging free movement cases.