Not exact matches
The site provides
free access to cases and statutes for
legal research and uses crowdsourcing — insights contributed by the
legal community — to annotate the
legal materials in its collection.
What if a
free legal research site could post cases and other primary
legal materials and ask its users to help enhance, explain and explicate those
materials?
I blogged earlier today about how Fastcase is disrupting the
legal publishing field, providing
free access to core
legal research materials.
Started in 2010, CourtListener is part of the broader
Free Law Project, a non-profit devoted to providing free online access to primary legal materials and to developing legal research to
Free Law Project, a non-profit devoted to providing
free online access to primary legal materials and to developing legal research to
free online access to primary
legal materials and to developing
legal research tools.
Number 4, «Auction off
legal research access to West or Lexis,» is interesting and it would be a good start — Wexis should definitely have to pay more for its captive audience — but I'd definitely take this further: Put Wexis out of business, either by using eminent domain to buy them out (replacing their for - profit services with non-profit analogues), or by simply creating a publicly - funded competitor that offers the same
material for
free to anyone with an internet connection.
Bear in mind that it is
free for law firms to participate in the
research process for directories like Chambers and
Legal 500, but the costs arise from the considerable staff and lawyer time taken to produce the
materials and engage in the process.