Sentences with phrase «free men if»

I once thought it would be impossible to live without these illusions; now I know that I would never have become a free man if I hadn't managed to get rid of them on my long journey home.

You can't say that Conrad Black would be a free man if he had been tried in Canada without any kind of proof.

Not exact matches

Not a musician, not a band (unless you consider him the front man for the band called Apple), just the guy who realized that even in a world of «free,» millions of people would pay for music if the service and player were easy to use, convenient, and extremely user - friendly.

If the chain is floundering, there's no evidence of it in the brand new outlet in a sprawling strip mall in suburban Toronto, where, one brisk Sunday evening in March, three men in their 40s sat beneath a wall - mounted flatscreen TV with their laptops, sipping coffee and taking advantage of the free Wi - Fi offered at the newly renovated franchise.

If, in our hypothetical example, the tax man agrees with your company's judgment about the spin - off's tax - free status, you will be guaranteed that treatment once the deal happens — with one important caveat.

Jason; so sorry you were so misled but the Bible refers to the earth as a circle (Isa.40: 22) some 700 years before Jesus ever came here and many other descriptions of what goes on here are so accurate as to make one wonder how man would know and if you are sincerely interested in finding what the bible really teaches (and having those misconceptions corrected) just ask and I will be glad to help or go to jw.org for all the free help you will ever need.

Which does mean that if a woman can have sex with a man than a man would be equally free to have sex with a man, as the genders «male and female» are treated the same (i.e. interchangeably).

They made differences to help souls of men get free from vice and avarice, and it appears to me that this is what God wants if he does indeed speak to you and me at all.

(Exodus 21:7 - 8) «If a man sells his daughter as a slave, the rules for setting her free are different from the rules for setting the male slaves free.

For example, if a man drives drunk and kills a family of 6, then it was his free will to get drunk and into his car, and God had nothing to do with it.

(This view is abbreviated DP3) J. L. Mackie has described a crucial aspect of this position: «If men's wills are really free, this must mean that even God can not control them... «5 If one takes seriously that idea of a universe composed of actual things in real relations with other actualities, then the idea that all power is concentrated in one actuality is nonsensical.

This is consistent, Plantinga says, if it means, «God created men and these free men always do what is right.»

We are free to choose — and what profiteth a man if he chooses «captivity and death»?

But if it means, «God creates free men and brings it about that they always freely do what is right,» it is inconsistent; for if God brings about their right actions, they do not do the actions freely.

If one believes in man's free will than what purpose does god serve (expect if there is an afterlife which is a whole other can of wormsIf one believes in man's free will than what purpose does god serve (expect if there is an afterlife which is a whole other can of wormsif there is an afterlife which is a whole other can of worms).

Observer, you can call God «Zeus», if you regard Him as our eternal infinite Holy Creator and Judge, who created all and will continue to create, whose purity requires purity to dwell with Him, whose love within overflowed to create man in His image with free will, who permitted rebellion for the purpose of destroying evil, and who surrendered His Son to allow us to use our free will to glorify Him and enjoy Him forever.

Yes, I have often wondered if this is a big reason Free Grace theology has not made greater inroads in certain areas, and why men like MacArthur just ignore us.

Man of himself is tempted to oppose God's will, to seek to do his own will, to feel free only if he is autonomous; he sets his own autonomy against the heteronomy of obeying God's will.

If his master gave him a wife while he was a slave, and they had sons or daughters, then the man will be free in the seventh year, but his wife and children will still belong to his master.

Islam permits the husband to resort to the remedy of divorce twice, and to remarry each time if a satisfactory reconciliation is attained, but a third divorce is decisive and a woman so divorced can not be made a legitimate wife a fourth time unless she first marries a different man and is then divorced by that man of his own free will, and there have been no consequences of that marriage.

If a person wishes to pursue a dubious moral course, the easy way is to disguise his conduct as the action of a free man, uninhibited by old rules, breaking loose and acting on his own.

If a man looks at a woman with the intent to have sex with her, or even just cat - calls her, it's because of how * she's * dressed, or how * she * presents herself, and * she's * always the one who is encouraged to do something about it, while the men get a free pass because hormones (or whatever excuse).

21:7 - 8) «If a man sells his daughter as a female slave, she is not to go free as the male slaves do» [God] Notice that God doesn't oppose this at all.

If the early church could hold together communities made up of Jews and Greeks, slaves and free, men and women, circumcised and uncircumcised, tax collectors and zealots, prostitutes and Pharisees, kosher believers and non-kosher believers, those who ate food sacrificed to idols and those who refused, I guess this evolution - accepting, hell - questioning, liberal - leaning feminist can worship Jesus alongside a Tea Party complementarian who thinks the earth is 6,000 years old and that Ghandi and Anne Frank are in hell.

If a man can be free of it, can he then will it, and if he is bound to it, can he be said to will iIf a man can be free of it, can he then will it, and if he is bound to it, can he be said to will iif he is bound to it, can he be said to will it?

Administrators who are rigid, «organization man» types find any group which nurtures free spirits an irritant if not an outright threat to their values and life - style.

If Catholics run the risk of resolving the divine / human paradox in favor of human free will (Co-Redemptrix), Protestants run the danger of resolving the paradox in favor of divine decree (double predestination — man is a zero).

But we can see that if man is to have life, he has to become free from the cycle of struggling not to covet, coveting, and condemning himself for coveting.

If man today is asking, can God's existence be reconciled with man's deepened experience of himself as free creator of the world, the Whitheadian approach with its notion of God's persuasive personal action in the world, with its discovery of God's presence yet absence in man's creative activity, with its stress on the mutual immanence of God and the world, offers pathways for further development.

If by the power of God's grace we are in a position to accept ourselves as pilgrims, as mortal men seeking their way with difficulty through the darkness, as failing again and again and yet bound in duty to an earthly task; if the Church effects that acceptance by celebrating the death of the Lord, and makes us men of prayer who are really conscious of the future judgment of God, if the Church sends its children strengthened with God's grace out into their own maturity which burdens them but sets them free, then the Church by its official ministry has done what it alone can and must dIf by the power of God's grace we are in a position to accept ourselves as pilgrims, as mortal men seeking their way with difficulty through the darkness, as failing again and again and yet bound in duty to an earthly task; if the Church effects that acceptance by celebrating the death of the Lord, and makes us men of prayer who are really conscious of the future judgment of God, if the Church sends its children strengthened with God's grace out into their own maturity which burdens them but sets them free, then the Church by its official ministry has done what it alone can and must dif the Church effects that acceptance by celebrating the death of the Lord, and makes us men of prayer who are really conscious of the future judgment of God, if the Church sends its children strengthened with God's grace out into their own maturity which burdens them but sets them free, then the Church by its official ministry has done what it alone can and must dif the Church sends its children strengthened with God's grace out into their own maturity which burdens them but sets them free, then the Church by its official ministry has done what it alone can and must do.

Still wandering the sea in thy scaly armor to inquire humbly at the mouths of rivers if man has perchance left them free for thee to enter....

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

If in Emerson's words «Every great institution is the lengthened shadow of a single man'there's no doubt that the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association's commitment to accountability is both a true reflection of Graham and a key reason why he has remained free of financial scandal.

If man does not have free will then how can he be guilty of sin?

If one lets the no - inherent - free - will interpretation of the less than 0.5 % of the Scriptures set the precedence on what the word of God says about man's free will, then a person is forced to do some absurd reasoning / interpretation of the majority of scriptures that imply that man has the inherent ability to accept / believe or reject God's call / drawing, commands, instructions, promises and gifts.

If you are a true believer you belive that God gave man free will.

-- Exodus 21:7 - 8 «If a man sells his daughter as a slave, the rules for setting her free are different from the rules for setting the male slaves free.

If you were God everything would be right and everyone would love everyone and nothing bad would ever happen and the deficit would be eliminated and all the men would be good looking and all the women strong and all the children above average and a chicken in every pot and free beer on Fridays and we'd all like it whether we wanted to or not.

Economic security for all men means something about colonies, about tariffs, about the free access of goods to those people who must have raw materials and markets if they are to have in normal times a standard of living adequate to relieve hunger and permit the free development of body and spirit.

If modern man can learn to use his free time well, he will live well generally, for the employment of leisure is the measure of selfhood.

If modern liberal education is to provide for the nurture of free men, it must regain the ideal of generality which characterized the traditional liberal arts, but it must do so without sacrificing the variety and scope made possible by modern advances in knowledge.

If you want to believe in a magical old man in the sky who has a plan for everything (nevermind the fact that if anyone deviates from this master plan that the aforementioned old man will never do anything to correct the deviation... of course... because he gives people free will, rightIf you want to believe in a magical old man in the sky who has a plan for everything (nevermind the fact that if anyone deviates from this master plan that the aforementioned old man will never do anything to correct the deviation... of course... because he gives people free will, rightif anyone deviates from this master plan that the aforementioned old man will never do anything to correct the deviation... of course... because he gives people free will, right?)

If it does not expect blind providence to save man through technical and material change, neither does it trust to a «free - ranging human intellect which contrives systems of absolute validity.»

19 And the priest shall put her under oath, and say to the woman, «If no man has lain with you, and if you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rsIf no man has lain with you, and if you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rsif you have not gone astray to uncleanness while under your husband's authority, be free from this bitter water that brings a cu «rse.

For centuries, men have worried about this problem: if God's grace is indeed His activity, coming before and present in every good human act, how can such acts be truly free and responsible acts on the part of the human agent?

Theologian Henri de Lubac dealt with this issue at length in his masterful book, The Drama of Atheist Humanism: «If man takes himself as a god, he can, for a time, cherish the illusion that he has raised and freed himself.

If «god» gave man free will, then why is it that everyone has to punished that doesn't obey?

This concept never received very clear definition from Kierkegaard but we are perhaps not far wrong if we say that repetition is man's free enactment of his relationship to eternity.

If man is determined, then he is not free to make choices and hence is morally not responsible.

If by nature things are determined by eternal, scientific laws, then man too is determined and not free.