On a previous occasion, a post to realclimate, which I believed to have been on - topic and
free of any ad hominem or other disqualifying attributes, had been rejected and I came to the conclusion that the same thing had happened once again.
Not exact matches
Fifty posts and NO SCIENCE FACTS OR THEORIES — just
ad hominem attacks on a man that helped keep the West
free and whose work has added billions
of dollars
of wealth through applications
of his work.
A funny thing has happened in climate science to scientific inquiry: the usual ethics
of free discussion and fact - based criticism have been discarded in favor
of ad hominem attacks on critics
of AGW theory.