Only
a free socialist society will be able to make them fully productive.
Not exact matches
It is hoped that the
socialist society, as visualized by Marx, gives people more social justice and security, more human dignity, more
free time, better standards of living etc..
This liberalism is defined by its vision of
society as a contract among naturally
free and equal persons, and its antitypes are communitarian visions of the left (
socialist, egalitarian community) and of the right (traditional, hierarchical, moralistic community).
In the struggle against such a system, what is being proposed as an alternative is not the
socialist system, which in fact turns out to be state capitalism, but rather a
society of
free work, of enterprise and of participation.
While Lenin definitely puts the
socialist state as a prerequisite and sets a great number of analysis on the subject, there are Marxist groups who totally deny it and aim towards a
free - communist
society as an end - target.
For Marx, Engels, and the
Socialist Party of Great Britain (WSM) since 1904 Socialism / Communism mean the same thing: a global moneyless, classless, wageless, stateless
society where production is for use and there is
free access to all that's produced, a system of
society that can not be established until the overwhelming majority of the worlds workers understand the concept of and want to organise for such a
society.
More modern
socialists have had to cope with the fact that the
free market as it existed in Marx's time continued to develop and create the richest
societies in the history of humankind.
In common with
socialist / Democrats, he remains dlireously keen on using the still highly imperfect and uncertain alarmist stooge - science as a trojan horse to undermine a
free society, advancing his real agenda of a totalirian distopia.
While some regulation and oversight is reasonable and indicated, I don't think we should become a
socialist society which tries to over-control
free markets.