Sentences with phrase «free speech activities»

If that had been the end of it, mall owners and managers would have found themselves with the authority to prevent citizens from engaging in free speech activities on mall property.

In the case of Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping Center, the Supreme Court said that first amendment free speech rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution do not guarantee individuals the right of access to private property for the purpose of keeping people informed through traditional free speech activities.

In Pruneyard, the court established that free speech activities were protected in shopping centers, and the only restrictions that mall owners could impose upon these activities were for «objectively reasonable» and «narrowly tailored» time, place, and manner restrictions.

We've learned that the Senator has no hesitation to threaten the livelihoods of members of our group, to attempt to convince the NYPD to stop our lawful free speech activities, and freely mimics Trump's crudeness by dropping an «F - bomb» on one member of our group who asked him politely to stop empowering pro-Trump Republicans in Albany.

At 4 p.m., CUNY student groups and individual students urge the Board of Trustees to reject a proposal that would virtually terminate students» control of their Activity Fee funds designated for political free speech activities, outside Shepherd Hall at 138th St. and St. Nicholas Avenue, Manhattan.

Not exact matches

The report authors also say they have seen significant new activity by political conservatives seeking to protect political free speech by companies, among other issues.

During the McCarthy era, she testified willingly before the House Committee on Unamerican Activities in support of the oppression of American communists, a clear indication that she did not believe in free speech.

With the Roberts Supreme Court already apparently reconsidering past precedents with an eye toward treating corporate and union donations as free speech, a federal appeals court has now ruled on behalf of Emily's List that nonprofits can use functionally unbounded «soft money» to finance their election - year activities.

Which could probably conflict with EU rules for the rights of minorities / free speech / political activities, but it is not the same than «death threat against a national minority».

«What we are witnessing in New York is Huxley's [sic] «Big Brother» in the flesh... Free political speech and association lies at the heart of the American experiment; the state must not be granted the right to monitor routine political activities and associations that pose no security threat.»

Whether we're talking about free speech on Usenet, the policy questions of legitimate marketing and com - mercial activity conducted over email, or the desirable but spam - ish mes - sages that trip the filters and disappear, there is always friction not around the most egregious case (no one argues for Leo Kuvayev's «\ / 1@gR / - \» messages) but at the blurry places where spam threatens to blend into acceptable use, and fighting one might have a deleterious effect on the other.

Harvard Admission Decision Prompts Debate Over Free Speech (Boston Globe) Howard Gardner weighs in on a free speech debate as it applies to a broader Harvard admissions decision this past week to rescind admission to a group of students for their activity on social meFree Speech (Boston Globe) Howard Gardner weighs in on a free speech debate as it applies to a broader Harvard admissions decision this past week to rescind admission to a group of students for their activity on social mefree speech debate as it applies to a broader Harvard admissions decision this past week to rescind admission to a group of students for their activity on social media.

WASHINGTON — Teachers» unions L violate non-members rights to free dom of speech and association when they use the fees that non-members are compelled to pay for activities unrelated to local collective barL gaining, a lawyer for six Michigan college instructors told the U.S. Su preme Court last week.

CALIFORNIA AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM, LOS ANGELES, Jan. 16 CAAM LA, where admission is always free, is hosting a day of activities marathon reading of King speeches, alongside it regular exhibition programming, including «Hank Willis Thomas: Black Righteous Space,» multimedia presentation.

She found herself having to defend fundamental democratic principles of free speech and activities associated with normal discourse such as «having a private meeting, conducting a workshop, publishing a report, or advocating that a public official take action» and underscored the importance of these activities in her own work at various NGOs and in academia — and as a staff member at the State Department.

The fossil fuel industry has responded to these suits by fiercely waging a campaign that claims that any legal action against the fossil fuel companies for funding organizations engaged in climate change denial activities is tantamount to a legally inappropriate suppression of free speech (See: Climate change vs. free speech: Punishing fossil fuel companies for expressing doubt).

The IRS denial, in short, hinges on the applicant's activities looking too much like a for - profit trade or business and also the following not qualifying as «charitable» --(1) preserving the fundamental human rights set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of free speech does not apply to residents or citizens of foreign countries).

Also, the real kicker is that the applicant fails to show that its human rights and free speech promoting activities would be legal under foreign countries» laws (I'm sure they simply forgot to ask Iran, Egypt, Turkey and North Korea).

«Spying on everyone's internet histories and email, text and phone records with no suspicion of serious criminal activity and no basic protections for our rights undermines everything that's central to our democracy and freedom — our privacy, free press, free speech, protest rights, protections for journalists» sources and whistleblowers, and legal and patient confidentiality.

Those countries feel the need to monitor for illegal activity, or for anti-government sentiment that we in North America would consider basic free speech.

In short, the Task Force offers a mix of greater restriction of those who appear to abuse the right of free speech, a mechanism for «positive» organized debate and a nicer environment for the students (although one wonders whether those who have no qualms about verbally beating down those who think differently from them will be persuaded to become genteel debaters because they have more space to engage in their activities).

Therefore, as in Terminiello and Edwards, the conviction under this statute must be reversed, as the statute is unconstitutional in that it sweeps within its broad scope activities that are constitutionally protected free speech and assembly.

v. Law Society of B.C. reviewed the disciplinary activity of the law society in B.C. over advertising practices, and emphasized the distinctions between the freedom of expression with the elective process in our democratic institutions, and that of economic free speech,

A large residential apartment complex is not a public forum, and constitutional free speech guarantees don't extend to the activities of tenant associations, a California appellate court has ruled.

In Golden Gateway Center v. Golden Gateway Tenants Association, California's Court of Appeal, First District, determined that constitutional free speech guarantees do not extend to the activities of a tenant's association in a large apartment complex.

A federal appeals court considered whether a tax on the lobbying activities of a tax - exempt 501 (c)(6) organization unconstitutionally interfered with the free - speech rights of such organizations.