Sentences with phrase «free speech does»

A commitment to free speech doesn't reconcile easily with human rights codes that may compel respect and courtesy toward specific groups — including their right to be addressed as they choose.

Oh, and by the way, the first amendment right to free speech does not give you a right to anonymous free speech.

A right is not an obligation: having the right to free speech does not mean that you have to speak freely for example.

The IRS denial, in short, hinges on the applicant's activities looking too much like a for - profit trade or business and also the following not qualifying as «charitable» --(1) preserving the fundamental human rights set forth in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (b / c it is a declaration, not a treaty or law) and (2) safeguarding free speech in foreign countries (as the US Constitution's guarantee of free speech does not apply to residents or citizens of foreign countries).

TrueSceptic@23, if you follow the hyperlink I put in, you'll see that a panel of state Supreme Court judges in the US thought that yes, free speech does include the right to tell lies.

As I say, free speech doesn't require «defending».

He says that because (he thinks) she's lying free speech doesn't apply to her.

«Free speech does not extend to misleading the public by making factually inaccurate statements», complained Bob Ward, the charmless leader of this new inquisition.

Note that four of nine justices said that free speech does not apply to corporations.

Incitement to violence is therefore a useful phrase, because it encapsulates how free speech does not extend to encouraging others to take away the freedom of others — in this case to live life without fear of attack.

«I believe in free speech but free speech doesn't mean you have the right to incite murder, to incite child abuse.

But free speech does not mean protection from backlash and people standing up for what's right.

Free speech doesn't mean people can break the law and obstruct public areas.

Free speech does have certain limits.

Free speech does not equal hate speech in my book.

So, all of these people believe that people shouldn't be allowed to say insulting things, because free speech doesn't protect it?

The American value honoring free speech doesn't preclude condemnation of the speech, only that there should be no legal punishment for it.

However, the First Amendment protection of free speech does not extend to children.

And we all know that free speech doesn't mean we can speak and write lies about others (this is how you get sued).

Chief Judge Joy Kramer wrote in her opinion: «The right of free speech does not guarantee to any person the right to use someone else's property.

free speech does not include SLANDER.

My question, if Exxan and GE have the same right to free speech I do as a citizen — why do they pay much lower corporate tax rates?

Dear Mark, as you fight the good fight in defense of free speech did I miss a post regarding The President's «trolling?»

Not exact matches

The right to free speech simply means that when you attempt to speak (or write) no one may rightly take action to forcibly stop you from doing so.

An employee does not have free reign [sic] to engage in political speech that disrupts the workplace, but punishing an employee for deviating from company orthodoxy on a political issue is not allowed either.

Although Thiel implies in his essay that the Gawker story about Hogan's sex tape would not have been published by any right - thinking journalistic outlet, and that the First Amendment doesn't and shouldn't protect such behavior, two higher - court judges ruled before the Hogan decision that the Gawker piece was clearly covered by the Constitution's free - speech protections.

To block very hurtful comments that do not use hate speech (something like «why don't you step in front of a truck») could be perceived as limiting free speech.

Fuchs said UF is dedicated to free speech and public discourse, but that the First Amendment does not require risk of imminent violence to students.

While it speaks volumes that many Americans value their right to free speech, this does not mean that we have to pay for their vitriol.

The tabloid is fighting for an important free speech principle and is pointing out, correctly, that celebrities like Hogan should not be able to use the media when it suits them and shut it down when it doesn't.

The app centers around a colorful feed, which Reddy also says has a combination of AI (natural language processing also analyzes every post) and human moderation to make sure that users retain their free speech but don't engage in targeted harassment and other negativity.

I can not afford the time to consider whether to write an article for some blog or not, whether to do a free speech or not or whether to accept a dinner invitation or not.

In the same way there are limits to free speech in the U.S., there's limits to what you can do on Reddit.

She concurred that given limits to government control of free speech, companies do have more freedom to police what's out there.

«When you have freedom of speech and freedom of expression and don't get thrown in jail by criticizing a bad idea, it's more likely bad ideas will get exposed, and it's not a coincidence oppressive regimes are also oppressive in clamping down on free speech.»

Facebook doesn't like to decide what kind of rhetoric is appropriate or inappropriate for fear of encroaching on its users» free speech rights.

But the two leaders did not take questions from reporters, a win for Xi, who oversees an authoritarian system that has sought to sharply limit free speech and press freedoms.

I don't think anyone would claim that specific groups can't have their own Facebook - like web site, but this particular site is perpetuating a gender segregation philosophy / ideology that many find abhorrent and readily use their free speech rights to argue against.

You are probably for free speech as long as the questions that are asked don't make you uncomfortable?

Nor does the conduct of these elites suggest that unfettered, Voltairean free speech is sacred to them.

> I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

Matt Walsh is a minority voice that is practicing his free speech rights, but his being fired REPEATEDLY in the past 4 years shows that freedom of speech does include the right to call him a pompous ass.

Just look at the visitors to this site that think they will be preaching to the choir only to find free speech is at work, not «fellowship»... some are shocked and try to tell those who don't believe that they have no business here.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

It sounds to me like you are fine with atheists supporting discrimination against gays, just so long as gays don't have to support the free speech or other rights of atheists.

SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s free speech, I just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged by both Christians and atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?

The radio station wrote in a statement: «while KPFA emphatically supports serious free speech, we do not support abusive speech.

Loosely translated, this means that the First Amendment does not protect, but restricts, free speech in public schools if it is religious in nature.

If there is any misunderstanding, school officials should take the opportunity to explain the fundamental principle of free speech in America: the government does not endorse every viewpoint it fails to suppress.