Sentences with phrase «free speech if»

Left unchecked, they may also introduce new forms of discrimination fueled by profiling and automated decisions - making, and potentially inhibit free speech if people in Canada fear their words may be collected, aggregated, and used to affect them in unpredictable ways.

So, free speech is only free speech if you agree with it?

You don't have free speech if everyone can only say what isn't offensive to anyone.

The entire staff of CNN has been forced to convert to mormonism ahead of the election out of fear of what concentration camp they will go in for their belief in free speech if romney wins.

Not exact matches

Because if money is free speech, so is horse shit.

It wasn't until I asked him if he'd heard of free speech that the tone changed.

Mr. Zuckerberg declined to answer whether Facebook is a neutral public forum or if it is expressing its own views of free speech, avoiding a complex legal question that Mr. Cruz was posing.

If true, then here we have another example of the state of free speech in the land of Campbell.

If the federal and state governments come in and slap new regulations and oversight on these companies, it's their own fault for practicing elitist arrogance in an attempt to shape a specific narrative that damages the very fabric of a society where the first amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the rights of free expression and free speech.

Well, if you're a tech company, then it's much easier to regulate your product without worries about infringing on free speech and freedom of the press, particularly if it can be proven that Facebook is bad for mental health and perhaps even for democracy.

If you ask them, I'm pretty sure that most liberal mainstream journalists are against punching conservatives who are peacefully exercising their rights to free speech - and they will probably mean what they say.

Even though that is a free speech, in any private company if disobey orders or slander private companies, you'll be fired.

I'm reading NFIB v. Sebelius (the Obamacare decision) in preparation for teaching the case to my constitutional law students and came across the following most interesting passage in in Justice Ginsburg's opinion: «A mandate to purchase a particular product would be unconstitutional if, for example, the edict impermissibly abridged the freedom of speech, interfered with the free exercise of religion, or infringed on a liberty interest protected by the Due Process Clause.»

I suggest that the same freedom of speech be afforded to both the «religious» and the «religious free» that there can be healing and healthy dialogue in community if all parties are committed to that.

Free speech means the right to express yourself even if others disagree with your views.

When the U.S. Muslim community sounds out LOUD and CLEAR, without equivocation, and immediately against all forms of terrorism, including all aggressive religious intolerance for human rights, women's right, children, equal protection under the law, the respect for other religions to coexist, the right to free speech, and the ability to separate church from state, IF THEY FINALLY DO THAT AND LOUDLY, then we will begin to feel comfortable that they are truly embracing American ideals and here to join us, not to oppose, defy, or undermine what we hold dear.

egyptians think you can have democracy if you have elections and free speech.

Perhaps it's easier to understand why this is not an easy free - speech case if I change «homosexual» to «Jew.»

Loosely translated, this means that the First Amendment does not protect, but restricts, free speech in public schools if it is religious in nature.

If there is any misunderstanding, school officials should take the opportunity to explain the fundamental principle of free speech in America: the government does not endorse every viewpoint it fails to suppress.

Corporations are people and have free speech rights, so businesses should be able to deny services to gays because of their beliefs, but if another corporation doesn't want to enter into a business venture because they found out their future partners are anti-gay bigots that is somehow wrong?

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

If I am to have a right to free speech, for example, then I must be empowered to speak and be heard, which means using the power of the state to give me the resources I need and to suppress anything that might disempower me.

If its the comments upsetting you then, like it or not, this is what free speech is about.

This site advocates free speech, so I thought, but if one gets too close to heart on truth, then you, and your speech is exiled, and not allowed on the premisses, plainly stated, you are booted out.

Here in the US, we have the freedom of religion and the right to free speech (though people tend to be persecuted if they step too far away from «political correctness» these days.

If someone is making a screamingly illogical argument, cite that fact in your own free speech to defeat that thought in the minds of others.

(CNN)- The deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans amid protests against a film that denigrates Islam has sparked global discussion and debate about whether there is a line between free speech and hate speech and, if so, where it lies.

If you ban free speech against Islam then Christians and others will feel justified in killing people as well when they are disrespected and insulted.

I am certain there have been many cases in the U.S. history that the court simply and clearly distinguished between free speech and hate speech and has set very heavy sentences for folks who did not care if their words cause harm.

CNN: Reaction to anti-Islam film fuels debate on free speech versus hate speech The deaths of the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans amid protests against a film that denigrates Islam has sparked global discussion and debate about whether there is a line between free speech and hate speech and, if so, where it lies.

If you start picking and choosing and labeling speech you don't like as hateful, it's not free anymore.

@Kevin, by your logic, if a group of Muslims want to have something to commemorate those who flew the planes into the building, that would simply be free speech.

Moulana Yousaf Qureshi — I will offer the same amount to anyone who will behead YOU for the same offense to Asia Bibi — if you have her killed, we would also like to see you killed because of offense to humanity — the same humanity that speaks for free speech, free chhoice of religion, free choice of politics, etc..

If Russia's neighbors were Canada and Mexico, rather than Germany, China, Turkey, and Poland, and if its other flanks were guarded by thousands of miles of open ocean, it might have free institutions and long traditions of free speech and the rule of laIf Russia's neighbors were Canada and Mexico, rather than Germany, China, Turkey, and Poland, and if its other flanks were guarded by thousands of miles of open ocean, it might have free institutions and long traditions of free speech and the rule of laif its other flanks were guarded by thousands of miles of open ocean, it might have free institutions and long traditions of free speech and the rule of law.

In its places, come things that are instituted by the dictator, and if you don't agree to go, you will be made to go, and free speech is out the window.

I wonder if they would endorse the FREE SPEECH of having a SIGN at these meetings that state: END THIS TIME WASTING, NONSENSE RITUAL, AND GET ON WITH DOING THE (NAME OF GOVERNING BODY»S) BUSINESS!

If your definition of freedom of speech has a «except when» in it, then you don't believe in the principle of free speech.

If Chick - fil - A discriminates based on race, gender, or sexual orientation, then they should be subject to government intervention, but a government can not and should not punish someone for free speech.

Perhaps you'd feel more comfortable is such a censored forum if free speech bothers you so?

Why is it that lately it seems that if somebody proclaims to be Christian and to hold onto those beliefs it's a problem because somebody else thinks differently and that they believe because you share what you believe that you are forcing it on somebody else but if a non-Christian tells a Christian that they ought to be quiet or tells the Christian that they are wrong it's okay and it's free speech.

The west is doomed if people contine to stifel free speech, if Muslums are so offended why do nt they show evidance to the contrary, rather then threatening peoples lives, destroying buildings, ect.

«If you can't persuade, silence,» tweeted Karen Swallow Prior, professor and pro-life activist who recently recalled her own encounter with the limits of liberal free speech when protesting abortion in the 1980s and»90s.

free speech only if it agrees with me?

I guess the whole free speech thing goes out the window if you are not a leftist liberal or a Sharia Muslim.

It sorta like if I went into a hospital and cussed at a patient and then claimed free speech as I got fired.

His actions can be taken as ableist microagressons against slower, smaller, less talented players and if your going to be consistant here his free speech ends where my right to not watch TD dances begins.

And if you are slamming SKJ as disloyal because he thinks he will have a better chance of reaching his goals elsewhere, then allow me (and others, I'm sure) to exercise my free speech to say that the thing that you said sucks.

And if free speech offends your delicate ears try moving to Russia, China or North Korea where it is denied.

Or if it is just my general wordy style that irritates you, well it is a free country and we are allowed free speech.