Because I know — and people who know me know — I am none of those things, I would normally ignore these unjust charges if
free speech just meant I suffered a few hurt feelings.
It is not an abuse of
free speech just to express something somebody else disagrees with.
We have rights to
free speech just as you do and I, for one, am SICK TO DEATH of hearing just your side of things!
This rioting over
free speech just proves the West and Islamic world are not compatible.
Not exact matches
A number of the users whose accounts were limited after this feature was being tested complained that their
free -
speech rights were being restricted for no reason,
just because they used a specific word.
Jurors in the federal
free speech lawsuit filed by James Tracy took
just three hours to reject his claim that the university...
But folks, this idea that we should be afraid of
free speech is
just unAmerican.
Just like with Phil Robertson, matt has the right to
free speech, but not freedom from consequences or people showing him the door
> I agree with Richard some people
just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to
free speech also.
I know this is very hard for theists to accept, but
free speech isn't
just for those who agree with you.
Just look at the visitors to this site that think they will be preaching to the choir only to find
free speech is at work, not «fellowship»... some are shocked and try to tell those who don't believe that they have no business here.
So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people
just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to
free speech also.
It sounds to me like you are fine with atheists supporting discrimination against gays,
just so long as gays don't have to support the
free speech or other rights of atheists.
SisterChromatid - your missing my point I am not trying to trample anyone else s
free speech, I
just personally think it could have been said differently, what they said makes them appear like the self righteous ones and that helps no one, as someone who is spiritual and gay I have been judged by both Christians and atheists alike, one says I am going to hell the other says I'm a nutjob, when does it stop?
But that freedom is
just one of many that we enjoy in the United States — and religious tolerance is no more, or less, valuable than are rights to
free speech, to bear arms, to be
free from search and seizure, to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, to be tried by our peers, to have our day in court, to not be imprisoned or fined without cause, to ensure State's rights, to be
free from slavery and involuntary servitude, and on, and on, and on.
There is no hate
speech,
just attempts to stifle
free speech with thought control laws.
The term «hate
speech» is
just a veiled attempt invented by the liberals to stifle
free speech.
The fact is... it has nothing to do with
free speech... you simply
just don't like his opinion.
Since pastors are
free to make political endorsements as individual citizens,
just not in their official capacities as leaders of the church, supporters of the Johnson Amendment contend that rather than restricting political
speech, the rules protect nonprofits from lobbying interests.
what happens when you try to facilitate
free speech / freedom of press and
just plain honesty in a catholic country?
Look at the commnents that you have given Bob alone????? I am all for
free speech, but seriously any one of you that sticks up for Tom Tom is
just a sick as he is.
@Ray: It's not
just the «so called «liberal»» that is for
free speech.
Just a friendly update from California that I have now spent my fifth day working on contacting all of the big
free speech legal advocates in Canada and the United States (and those important organizations in Europe as well) about this story and the entire issue of Free Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silen
free speech legal advocates in Canada and the United States (and those important organizations in Europe as well) about this story and the entire issue of
Free Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silen
Free Speech (which these public figure pastors in the U.S. who are nationally known want to silence).
Hi David,
Just a note that even though I am in California, I have contacted top Canadian
free speech legal experts about what this US group is doing to you and the you've been «warned» part.
Thanks Elvis, People love
free speech,
just not from uneducated cave dwellers named Elvisisback, maybe you should have finished school?
@perrrob — you forgot the concentration camp, the torture, the suspension of habeas corpus, the illegal mass wiretapping of Americans, the secret renditions, the black prisons, the reduction of
free speech into «
free speech zones», the blockage of stem cell research, and
just so much more.
I think it
just speaks for itself, when some random assortment of leaders offer a bounty to murder anyone who exercises
free speech that contends with the word of the murderer muhamed, they too should be murdered.
But giving your mom a
speech about how you are morally superior to her for not eating animals is false logic, considering the slave labor used to produce your fruits, vegetables, nuts, and other delicious animal -
free ingredients (coffee, sugar, bananas, mangos, berries, peaches, and cashews are
just a few examples of foods imported from the third world where workers are severely mistreated and underpaid, or farmed by underpaid Mexican immigrants in the US).
Or if it is
just my general wordy style that irritates you, well it is a
free country and we are allowed
free speech.
That is not
free speech, but plain Stereotyping and the victim in this case
just happened to be a muslim pundit that he stumbled upon.
there's
free speech and then there's
just giving license to brainlessness!
They have a right to
free speech and
free demonstration
just as much as your teen does.
These are
just a few
free resources to help cope with a toddler
speech delay.
I'm
just of the opinion that populism isn't a bad thing; I see controlled media in the hands of the few, spin, party politics, censoring and suppression of
free speech as much more harmful to society.
Free speech, baby — it's yours for
just as long as you're willing to defend it.
I too believe in
free speech and Obama should've
just laughed this one off.
For instance, in a major policy
speech before the Constituent Assembly in Karachi on August 11, 1947,
just three days before Pakistan's inception, he stated, «You are
free to go to your temples, you are
free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this state of Pakistan.
It's
just a question of
free speech after all, right?
If people can buy things in order to restrict
free speech you're
just switching the power of censorship from election to mammon.
Leading off the argument was former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who said corporations have the right to
free speech during elections,
just as individuals do.
Suppressing Internet access is
just one more way to keep
free speech in check.
Yes, this sounds like the start of a bad joke, but for regular Westminster Watchers, familiar with the Reform Section 5 Campaign, this unlikely alliance has
just secured a major victory for
free speech.
I
just don't know what the mechanism would be like in terms of removing him... I don't know what's protected by
free speech.
«The battle for
free speech has
just begun.»
This is
just as the party said it believes that the reported moves to arrest the media adviser to former military President Ibrahim Babangida, Mr. Kassim Afegbua over General Babangida's declaration that President Muhammadu Buhari should not be voted to continue in office by 2019, is a ploy to set the table for a vicious muzzling of constitutionally guaranteed
free speech and right to opinion of citizens in the country.
3.20 pm: On the Comment is
free rolling blog, Polly Toynbee has
just posted her verdict on Sarah Teather's
speech.
The key section of his
speech was these words: «
Just as those who supported the dogma of big government were proved wrong, so, too, those who argue for the dogma of unbridled
free - market forces have been proved wrong again.»
NEC members praised his conference
speech and drew attention to Tory attacks on employment rights including access to tribunals, the paradox under which British railways can be run by states as long as they are foreign states, the need for good jobs not
just any jobs, further cuts in public service pay, the threat of a new European / United States trade agreement, excessive warmth towards
free schools, and expansion of food banks and payday loans into mainstream society.
We can now create our own content and share it with audiences large and small, so we should worry about anyone who aims to stand in the way of the transmission of
free speech —
just as we would worry about someone who would try to block you from telephoning a friend, or using a fax machine to send them a document.
Sign up a
free personal
speech in the category Casual dating sites to dating, Via a clear definition you want to dissatisfaction may be found herself Maureen that treats you
just head under the site came arcoss many of Craigslist.