Sentences with phrase «free speech rights as»

The US Supreme Court decided in the past year that a corporation has the same free speech rights as an individual, so campaign contribution limits did not apply.

At the time, this letter was also criticized for failing to clarify free speech rights as previous OCR letters had done.

Not exact matches

Some right - wing websites have already started criticizing the company's latest move as a crackdown on free speech, and an attempt to enforce «politically correct» behavior.

As long as people have a right to freedom of speech, businesses are free to sell whatever is still legaAs long as people have a right to freedom of speech, businesses are free to sell whatever is still legaas people have a right to freedom of speech, businesses are free to sell whatever is still legal.

Facebook, which got the case moved to San Francisco from Illinois, argued the users hadn't suffered a concrete injury such as physical harm, loss of money or property; or a denial of their right to free speech or religion.

«Kanye West has a right to free speech, and he has the right to spout lies and misinformation and misplaced opinions — but we as consumers have the right to fight back against this type of dangerous propaganda,» it read.

As blame fell to Facebook for Trump's election, word of Facebook prototyping a censorship tool for operating in China escaped, triggering questions about its respect for human rights and free speech.

Laycock's hypothesis ripened into full - blown suspicion by June 2000 when Justice Stevens took the position that the free speech rights of the Boy Scouts were not violated by a state law requiring them to employ an avowed homosexual as an assistant scoutmaster.

«Unfortunately, this new action can not be seen as anything other than an attempt to muzzle the church and subject our right of free speech to government review and regulation,» he added.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

It sounds to me like you are fine with atheists supporting discrimination against gays, just so long as gays don't have to support the free speech or other rights of atheists.

Besides, are you suggesting that we suppress anyone's right to free speech because if you are than you need to move to one of these bass ackward countries where a less than middle school quality production of a total farce can insight people to act as a pack of rabid dogs blaming America for why they live in dirt... We are LUCKY and BLESSED to live in a land where we can smile and walk away from an opinion that we disagree with... that South Park can but Jesus in a boxing ring against Satan and depict Moses as a glowing spinning dreidl... and these nutcases want to burn and pillage because one lunatic makes a childish and stupid play on videotape?

Christians get up in arms whenever anybody messes with the «rites» of baptism and the Lord's Supper, and we get up in arms whenever anybody messes with our legal «rights,» such as the right to free speech, the right to practice our religion, or the right to bear arms.

A parallel can be found in a civil right as sacred as that of free speech, which can not be infringed but does suffer some regulation: pornography, fighting words, and libel are not protected from state law by the First Amendment.

While this is usually spun as a victory against intrusive moralists, in expanding the free speech right the Court nonetheless threw under the bus those people particularly susceptible to becoming consumed by obscenity.

Or, should conservative America rally around Eich's right to free speech, as they have around Dan Cathy and Phil Robertson, Firefox might surpass the other browsers and come out stronger than before.

We have rights to free speech just as you do and I, for one, am SICK TO DEATH of hearing just your side of things!

Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a) society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property, free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.

However, we, as Americans should know better about the ramifications of our actions before we use our wonderful right of «free speech» as it could possibly get someone killed by some murderous fanatic half way around the world, or... even possibly here in our own country.

In a statement, Broglio's office said: «Archbishop Broglio and the Archdiocese stand firm in the belief, based on legal precedent, that such a directive from the Army (about not reading the letter) constituted a violation of his Constitutionally - protected right of free speech and the free exercise of religion, as well as those same rights of all military chaplains and their congregants.»

As collective individuals they have a right to influence through free speech and voting, the moral landscape of their society.

As a matter of fact I believe in Gay marriage, I think everyone should have equal rights... even equal rights at free speech.

Atheists have the same right to free speech as religious zealots.

The NFL Players» Union issued a statement defending its members right to free speech, saying «It is a source of enormous pride that some of the best conversations about these issues have taken place in our locker rooms in a respectful, civil and thoughtful way that should serve as a model for how all of us can communicate with each other.

Their lawyers also said Mr Avakian and the state Bureau of Labor and Industries violated the Kleins» rights as artists to free speech, their rights to religious freedom and their rights as defendants to a due process.

As long as consumers are not misled, they have a free speech right to call their products what they arAs long as consumers are not misled, they have a free speech right to call their products what they aras consumers are not misled, they have a free speech right to call their products what they are.

His actions can be taken as ableist microagressons against slower, smaller, less talented players and if your going to be consistant here his free speech ends where my right to not watch TD dances begins.

They have a right to free speech and free demonstration just as much as your teen does.

However as I keep reminding all and sundry, every one of us has the right to free speech and expression, BUT everyone also has the responsibility to know what they are talking about.

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) in Ghana believes in the principles that democratic societies provide individuals with the best conditions for political liberty, personal freedom, equality of opportunity and economic development under the rule of law; and therefore being committed to advancing the social and political values on which democratic societies are founded, including the basic personal freedoms and human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prosprights, as defined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prospRights; in particular, the right of free speech, organization, assembly and non-violent dissent; the right to free elections and the freedom to organize effective parliamentary opposition to government; the right to a free and independent media; the right to religious belief; equality before the law; and individual opportunity and prosperity.

Leading off the argument was former Solicitor General Ted Olson, who said corporations have the right to free speech during elections, just as individuals do.

Elia responded Thursday in a letter to the governor that she too supported the students who exercised their free speech rights, and that her agency will investigate «any reports where the safety of students was put in jeopardy, as we always do.»

In the past, Halloran has also warned the Mayor's office of many unconstitutional city plans, such as the so - called Crisis Pregnancy Center Bill that Bloomberg signed into law and was struck down in Federal Court three days after he signed it, which curtailed the free - speech rights of Catholic institutions.

«Russia's own constitution is under assault as Putin cracks down on the rights of gays and lesbians, any NGO receiving non-Russian funding, and free speech rights for all Russians.»

We uphold the ideal of free speech on reddit as much as possible not because we are legally bound to, but because we believe that you - the user - has the right to choose between right and wrong, good and evil, and that it is your responsibility to do so.

Teachout said she «disagrees» with Cuomo's order this month banning business with pro-BDS companies because, «as a strong advocate for the First Amendment right to free speech, I will stand up for the right of any group to share its views, even when I disagree with it.»

The only serious candidate among them who can sustain the prevailing peace as well as keep the democratic space for free speech and the enjoyment of fundamental human rights is Mr. John Dramani Mahama.

If Paladino does not step down, as expected, the board will appeal to state Education Commissioner MaryEllen Elia to remove him, forcing her to weigh his opponents» arguments of racism against his First Amendment right to free speech.

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions can be considered individuals as far as their political contributions are concerned and that restricting their ability to donate to candidates amounted to a violation of their First Amendment right of free speech.

«My client feels very strongly that his constitutional rights, including his right to free speech have been violated by the actions of the majority members of the Board, the Board of Education and the school district as a result of a resolution that was passed seeking to remove my client from elected office,» Vacco said.

The other board members seized on Paladino's comments as an opportunity to remove him from the Board of Education, despite protection under the First Amendment and his right to free speech, the lawsuit alleges.

«Free speech is the cornerstone to our democracy and the defendants» actions in this instance are a flagrant violation of my client's protected rights as a citizen of this nation,» Vacco said.

According to the Buffalo News, that process could take up to eight months, as Elia will have to «weigh the board's arguments against Paladino's First Amendment right to free speech.»

The We the People Amendment is the only amendment that deals with both Supreme Court doctrines that grant constitutional rights to artificial entities and that define spending money as free speech.

We find this act a criminalization of free speech, a breach of the fundamental human right of Mr. Fadi, and as well, a slap on the face of rule of law.

This section specifically was found to violate the rights of free speech, as protected by the First Amendment, for a collection of individuals gathered via contractual agreement.

Shouldn't the Supreme Court conclude that if EXXON Mobile and GE have the same free speech right that I do as a citizen that they should pay taxes at the same rate a normal citizen pays?

I ask again, if EXXON Mobil and GE have the same free speech right I do as a citizen then don't you agree they should pay taxes at the same rate a normal citizen pays?

Our legal giants confused citizens rights to free speech with a corporations right to make unlimited donations as «free speech.»

My question, if Exxan and GE have the same right to free speech I do as a citizen — why do they pay much lower corporate tax rates?