«Criticism is also no longer this «outside» look at an «inside», nor the combat of
freedom against the institution.
Not exact matches
In a statement on March 14, 2012, entitled «United for Religious
Freedom,» the Administrative Committee of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops said that the mandate requires individual Catholics, and Catholic
institutions, to «act
against Church teachings.»
I've had a couple of traumatic, triggering experiences this week which have had me thinking again about just how much I struggle
against institutions, so - called authority figures, and what I perceive to be (or are) obnoxious agents trying to exert «control» over my
freedom of expression and thought and behaviors.
God in His
freedom raises up men who speak His word of judgment
against all «holy» orders and
institutions.
Against the
institution's detractors» from Marx to radical feminists to Michel Foucault's theories about oppressive «disciplining» mechanisms» the family provides the modern world with a zone of
freedom joined to responsibility in a way that no other
institution does or could.
Those who argue
against same - sex marriage on the basis of its potential to diminish the effectiveness of the
institution as a solid foundation for social stability have not thought about the price we have already paid for this personal
freedom, or the historical reality that most citizens of Western Nations have already chosen to pay it rather than choose the relative social stability / security of tribalistic collectivism.
And, to make the matter worse, no protest was raised
against the
institution per se, demanding the equal
freedom of all men.
Our laws if allowed to operate according to its spirit and letter, would have imposed legal limits on government's authority by guarantee us certain rights and
freedom when fighting
against these evil practices in our
institutions but unfortunately for us, certain provisions and attitude of party apparatchiks make our leaders automatic dictators who act without limitations.
For this not to happen, and for there to be sustainable peace as well as credible progress
against poverty before 2030, then what needs to be in place are «responsive and legitimate
institutions» that «encourage the rule of law, property rights,
freedom of speech and the media, open political choice, access to justice, and accountable government and public
institutions» (UN-High-Level-Panel, 2013: 9).
Like it is mentioned in the Introduction, weighing the human rights and fundamental
freedoms is not only
against theory and raison d'être of the
institution of the fundamental rights, but theoretically impossible and morally wrong.
Knowledge of the common techniques by which scientists are attacked, irrespective of their discipline and research area, is essential so that
institutions can support their academics
against attempts to thwart their academic
freedom.