Shared decision making includes mutual sharing of information about benefits and harms of the range of care options, respect for the woman's autonomy to make decisions in accordance with her values and preferences, and
freedom from coercion or punishment for her choices.
To put it another way, Dignitatis Humanae is not just about
freedom from coercion.
Freedom was grounded in the objective dignity of the human person as entailing
a freedom from coercion.
Not exact matches
Second, the image of God entails that men must be allowed
freedom in their own minds («soul liberty»)
from coercion from other men.
Reflect on this a little: Many of the inspirations of the threefold system of political economy derive
from evangelical inspirations such as personal creativity, personal responsibility,
freedom, the love for community through association and mutual cooperation, the aim of bettering the condition of every person on earth, the cultivation of the rule of law, respect for the natural rights of others, the preference for persuasion by reason rather than by
coercion, and a powerful sense of sin.
However, men can not discharge these obligations in a manner in keeping with their own nature unless they enjoy immunity
from external
coercion as well as psychological
freedom.
This
freedom means that all men are to be immune
from coercion on the part of individuals or of social groups and of any human power, in such wise that no one is to be forced to act in a manner contrary to his own beliefs, whether privately or publicly, whether alone or in association with others, within due limits.»
If one asks, what are the possible roads to a world without war, that essential way - station on the way to
freedom of information in anecologically organized world, Arthur Waskow answers that there are five: (a) Control of the nation - state system through stabilizing the balance of power and reducing international tensions but keeping the weapons; (b) Reform of the system through total disarmament without abandoning national sovereignty or the pursuit of national interest; (c) Extension of the system through the creation of a federal world government; (d) Fragmentation of the system through increases in the power of extra-national associations and Institutions across national boundaries, and corresponding decreases in state power as these occupational, industrial, scientific, and other groups gradually expropriate
from the national governments the power to make decisions within their own fields; and (e) Abolition of the system through substituting love f or
coercion.20.»
Still in draft form, the Code of Conduct commits signatories to faithful compliance with Charitable Choice; to straightforward and consistent communication about their religious identity among their volunteers, service beneficiaries, donors and government partners; to refraining
from using government funding for «confessional activities»; to winsome and gentle witness; to love of neighbor; to
freedom from religious
coercion; to nondiscrimination toward program participants; to faithfulness to their mission; to credible and objective evaluation procedures; to avoidance of «turf wars» with other FBOs and nonprofits; and to rigorous financial accountability.
Freedom from the authority of specific norms, and
from a sense of
coercion in following them, leads to moral anarchy and finally degeneracy.
Drawing
from the Islamic imperative that «God is one» and
from the Qur» an's teaching about Adam and Eve, Rauf arrives at two essential principles: that all humans are equal «because we are born of one man and woman,» and that «because we are equal... we have certain inalienable liberties,» such as the
freedom to accept or reject God, to think for ourselves (ijtihad) and to make individual choices without
coercion.
In the Spanish - speaking nations and diaspora, evangélico carries the ideas of
freedom from political compromise, religious
coercion, and ideological rigidness.
In its own words, Dignitatis Humanae says «religious
freedom... has to do with immunity
from coercion in civil society [emphasis added].
But
freedom for the republican consists not in being free
from coercion in respect of some action, but rather in being free
from the possibility of
coercion in respect of it.
Article 18 (2) of the ICCPR provides an important protection to the
freedom of belief, in prohibiting
coercion from impairing the
freedoms to have the religion or belief of one's choice.
Dr Laura Markam has recently written a book called, «Peaceful Parent, Happy Kids, How to Stop Yelling and Start Connecting», which along with Pam Leo's «Connection Parenting: Parenting Through Connection instead of
Coercion, Through Love instead of Fear», and Naomi Aldort's book, «Raising our Children, Raising Ourselves: Transforming Parent - Child Relationshiops
from Reaction and Struggle to
Freedom, Power and Joy», outlines the new consciousness that is entering the parenting arena.
Until I read Pam Leo's book Connection Parenting: Parenting Through Connection Instead of
Coercion, Through Love Instead of Fear and Naomi Aldort's book Raising Our Children, Raising Ourselves: Transforming parent - child relationships
from reaction and struggle to
freedom, power and joy.