Royal debt jubilees thus
freed society from debt bondage, but did not liberate slaves.
Not exact matches
His top piece of advice was that «2016 is the year to break
free from mediocrity and
society's «norms.»
You're living your
free life and then suddenly isolated
from the rest of the
society.
Therefore, whether current households suffer
from inter-generational inequity depends on whether one believes that the average size of houses is a
free individual choice or, at least to some extent, is being imposed by the construction industry and
society more generally.
Increased repression is a lesson
from Gorbachev: you can't
free up
society while displaying the skeletons in the CCP's closet.
His second tip is that «2016 is the year to break
free from mediocrity and
society's norms.
Buffett added that, «we've got a rich
society that can do that and a
society that will benefit
from free trade, and I think we oughta try to hit both objectives of making sure that there is no roadkill and, at the same time, that 320 million people get the benefits of
free trade.»
the negation of ideology, the political secularization of the doctrine of original sin, the cautious sentiment tempered by prudence, the product of organic, local human organization observing and reforming its customs, the distaste for a priori principle disassociated
from historical experience, the partaking of the mysteries of
free will, divine guidance, and human agency by existing in but not of the confusions of modern
society, no framework of action, no tenet, no theory, and no article of faith, a distrust of the systems and processes of the idol of self and of the lust for power and status, scorn to all approaches of ideology and meta - narrative.
Hope amidst suffering, hope when men know only defeat and despair, hope when death seems to smother out the shoots of life springing
from the hearts of men, hope for our
society, our world, our city, our schools, courts, prisons, legislatures, hope for our children, for our elderly, hope for all the millions of men and women over the face of this globe who simply want to live out their lives as
free human beings not trampled down and stepped on by the overlords of this world.
Ben Whitnall
from the the Bible
Society's told Premier's Marcus Jones on the News Hour why they've launched a
free app to help parents share a Bible story with their children at bedtime.
Perhaps it will help us to break
free from mutual recriminations and to join together in reaffirming the elemental features of our shared faith that can generate and support the attitudinal changes that are so badly needed in the whole of
society.
Religious liberty is plainly essential for the endurance of our
free society and for the protection of the rights and freedoms of the many millions of Americans who dissent
from the caustic Gnosticism that increasingly dominates our culture.
However, the realism indicated above means that, along with dreamers, we need doers who seek power in the real world of the present to
free the oppressed
from the tyranny of the dominating idols of our
society.
Keith Barltrop's review of Alain de Botton's new book brings out the bankruptcy of an alternative, humanist approach, in which Christian ideas, cut
free from their Christian roots, are appropriated by non-believers in their pursuit of an ideal secular
society.
For instance, inasmuch as the founders» notion of
free self - government rests on an essentially Lockean conception of freedom as power outside and prior to truth (however much God or truth imposes an extrinsic obligation to obey, and however reasonable it is to do so in view of future rewards and punishments), then American liberty will eventually erode the moral and cultural foundations of civil
society inherited
from Protestant Christianity.
I think anytime anyone challenges, confronts, or steps aside
from old convictions or
societies assumtions it can be extremely
freeing yet terrifying but it leads to growth in areas you did not know existed.
One of the Yale ministers stated this point of view very well when he said: «Alcoholism is a sin only in the sense that it is a sin attributed to
society, especially a Christian
society — that we have been unable to bring about a world
free from the tensions and conflicts of the present day.
It is love to obey God, and by having a swift death penalty we love the people in our
society [many of whom are our enemies also] and offer them the best chance for a life
free from fear and crime.
Not until
society is cleansed
from this garbage will we be truly
free.
A redeemed
society is one redeemed inwardly and outwardly, purged of personal sin and
freed from the crippling and corrupting effects of social sin.
But the net result is this: All the way
from the street gang of juvenile delinquents through the
free - and - easy sex life of many adolescents and adults to the income tax evasion of many a «respectable» member of
society — to do right is to do what one can get away with; to do wrong is to do what is not safe.
Jesus reveals a
free God, who is uncoopted and uncontained by those identified with religion This God is
free to hear the cry of the outcasts against the guardians of religious
society This God is not under the power of Brahman but is
free to hear ones against Brahmans and other upper castes and side with the Dalits, who are ousted
from the Temples and who are denied the right to study the Scriptures.28
Yeah, just democratic capitalism, which has
freed more people
from slavery, oppression and poverty than any other system of civilized
society in the history of mankind.
The conclusion to be drawn
from Riezler's treatment of public opinion is that true community must be re-established in mass
society if that
society is to remain a
free one which serves the people.
But even before they had
freed themselves
from the bonds of English
society they had undertaken an «Agreement» in Cambridge, England, the year before and bound themselves to a new covenant with obligations both to God and one another.16 The «Agreement» of the Massachusetts Bay Colony was a beginning that contained its own principle, just as, as we have seen, the acts establishing the new republic did.
Spelled out in a lengthy lead editorial entitled «Evangelicals in the Social Struggle,» as well as in books such as Aspects of Christian Social Ethics, Henry's understanding of Christian social responsibility stressed (a)
society's need for the spiritual regeneration of all men and women, (b) an interim social program of humanitarian care, ethical proclamation, and personal, structural application, and (c) a theory of limited government centering on certain «freedom rights,» e. g., the rights to public property,
free speech, and so on.18 Though the shape of this social ethic thus closely parallels that of the present editorial position of Moody Monthly, it must be distinguished
from its counterpart by the time period involved (it pushed others like Moody Monthly into a more active involvement in the social arena), by the intensity of its commitment to social responsibility, by the sophistication of its insight into political theory and practice, and by its willingness to offer structural critique on the American political system.
Also, they may hold that even Christians are not
free from the effects of original sin, so that for them, too, the discipline of want, when they fail to perform their due service to
society, is desirable.
This represents a refreshing and welcome change
from the physicalist and «value
free» programmes which abound in Western
societies.
The question is being asked whether the price for the present pattern is not too high, whether we could not, without losing me many good things in our
society, have a
freer impulse life, a richer imaginative consciousness, be less alienated
from our bodies, be capable of more profound intimacy with a few and more community with many others.
It seems we have passed
from a
society that allows legal access to these drugs and services to one that insists that they must be
free,....
And liberation involves not mere personal repentance but, far more important, social revolution,
freeing the downtrodden
from the oppressive structures of
society.
From your posts looks like you want society to be free from any form of ethics... which makes u the cave
From your posts looks like you want
society to be
free from any form of ethics... which makes u the cave
from any form of ethics... which makes u the caveman.
Griffin & Sherburne, New York: The
Free Press, 1978, 104) The originality prevents us then
from holding that in abstraction
from its animal body an «entirely living» nexus is a
society.
From the perspective of James Madison's observations about factions and freedom in Federalist No. 10, for example, the respect for tradition and the flourishing of faith is not a glitch but a feature of a
free society, which encourages the development of a variety of human types.
How can it claim to bridge the divisions in human
society — divisions between Greek and barbarian, bond and
free, between white and black, Aryan and non-Aryan, employer and employed — if, when men are drawn into it, they find that another division has been added to the old ones — a division of Catholic
from Evangelical, or Episcopalian
from Presbyterian or Independent?
@Atheist,
From a practical standpoint, if there is no
free will then how do you, or
society, hold individuals responsible for their own behavior?
Citizens who take part commonly explain their efforts as attempts to «give back» for all that they have received
from the
free society, or to meet the obligations of
free citizens to think and act for themselves.
Each culture must be
free to draw
from its own tradition, but always in such a way as to direct it towards the needs of an ecologically sensitive global
society.
The ancient dream of a
society free from famine, disease, poverty, and despair is beginning to be fulfilled by the applications of science.
Geographically mobile and deriving prestige, power, and satisfaction
from their work, those who wield the most influence in modern
societies are, as Robert Rodes has observed, often «very
free in adopting measures that undermine the geographical stability and delicate communities on which others depend for practical and emotional support.»
Our prevailing legal emphasis on the
free, self - determining individual fits quite well with the series of economic and social changes that, by liberating so many of us
from family and group ties, have dramatically affected the capacity of families to carry out all the tasks for which
society continues to rely on them.
1) Charities spend their income on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products, rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax -
free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve
society;
from birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends money on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to serve the needy, thus giving «the average citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes
Furthermore, in individual circumstances, though not in
society as a whole, there are situations so
free from injustice that one may well «thank God and take courage.»
Society and morality, like nature, came to be understood as separate
from God and thus
freed from religion.
Founded in 1992 and run since 2000 by the Ethics and Public Policy Center, the Tertio Millennio Seminar on the
Free Society brings two dozen young people from central and eastern Europe together with twelve or so of their American counterparts to explore the principles and prospects of building free and virtuous societ
Free Society brings two dozen young people
from central and eastern Europe together with twelve or so of their American counterparts to explore the principles and prospects of building
free and virtuous societ
free and virtuous
societies.
Imagine being
free of
society,
free to bury oneself, to cut oneself off
from technology and all the attendant chatter and hysteria.
Quite a few of us have stable relationships, raise healthy well - educated children, are
free from addiction, vote, volunteer and donate to support causes that help make this
society work, live in harmony with people who are different
from us — I could go on, but you may get the idea that most of us do things most people would call good and have neither the inclination nor the time to do abominable things.
It is about a
free society, but it's the religious that are trying to prevent it
from being one.
This is your chance to be
free from an entangled mass sheep
society.
Breaking the gospel
free from its European captivity is at one and the same time clothing it in new thought forms and relating it to the realities of Pacific
societies.