If Chad and others argue that naturalistic evolution must be dismissed because we don't know exactly what happened with gene mutation and transmission
frequencies during particular periods of rapid change, then how can we accept a replacement argument in which we don't even know what happens at all?
Not exact matches
«The court observes first of all that the data to be retained make it possible, in
particular, (1) to know the identity of the person with whom a subscriber or registered user has communicated and by what means, (2) to identify the time of the communication as well as the place from which that communication took place and (3) to know the
frequency of the communications of the subscriber or registered user with certain persons
during a given
period.
The
particular frequencies derived from the planets, otherwise known as the «Music of the Spheres», were believed
during the Renaissance
period to have a direct effect on the human psyche.
In
particular, in the European Mediterranean region, increases in the
frequency of extreme climate events
during specific crop development stages (e.g., heat stress
during flowering
period, rainy days
during sowing time), together with higher rainfall intensity and longer dry spells, are likely to reduce the yield of summer crops (e.g., sunflower).