Sentences with phrase «frivolous claims cost»

Not exact matches

In the event that you are able to demonstrate that the costs of Arbitration will be prohibitive as compared to the costs of litigation, NBCUniversal will pay as much of your filing and hearing fees in connection with the Arbitration as the Arbitrator deems necessary to prevent the arbitration from being cost - prohibitive, regardless of the outcome of the Arbitration, unless the Arbitrator determines that your claim (s) were frivolous or asserted in bad faith;
This is why the industry is doing everything possible to reduce costs, for example by campaigning for compensation reform to tackle excessive legal costs and frivolous claims, and setting up the Insurance Fraud Register to further reduce fraud».
Don't forget that if a claim is brought that would be covered by the policy, the policy also covers the cost of defending you against that claim — even if it's ridiculous, frivolous, or otherwise shouldn't have been brought in the first place.
Payment of a large claim, and even defense against a frivolous one, is well worth the few dollars a month that renters insurance costs in Plainsboro.
We know what lawyers cost, and you don't want to have to pay a defense attorney to defend you against a frivolous claim.
Liability coverage generally includes defense costs, as well, and most policies pay those without regard to the policy limits because it's in the best interest of you, the company, and other policyholders to prove the liability claim before paying it, in order to avoid large settlements for false or frivolous claims.
Just as importantly, it also pays for your defense costs if someone brings a claim and says you injured them in a way that would be covered, even if the claim is frivolous.
If you're sued once for that amount, even if the claim isn't paid because the suit is frivolous, the defense costs paid by the insurer more than make up for the money you paid in.
Deductibles help you to manage your insurance costs; they also help to prevent frivolous claims and abuse of the system.
By treating the claim as an asset with a value that can be measured in the marketplace, Juridica adds important incentives to the corporate litigation and arbitration system: far greater transparency, reduction of unnecessary costs, faster resolution of cases, and a reduction in frivolous claims — with better outcomes for businesses.
Our snapshot of cases captures a somewhat different picture, which is the cost of self - represented litigants to the justice system in terms of frivolous, unsupported, or improperly framed claims, applications and appeals, resulting in adjournments and, more generally, wasted and inefficiently used court time.
Act 2, including: changes to Wisconsin's product liability laws; adding Daubert standards for cases tried in Wisconsin involving expert opinion and evidence; eliminating the controversial «risk contribution» theory created by the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 2005 Thomas v. Mallett decision; placing caps on punitive damages; and reducing frivolous lawsuits by holding parties liable for costs and fees for filing frivolous claims.
«The costs are still far higher in the UK than the US because here you pay the other side's costs if you lose, which means that funders will not get involved in frivolous claims.
The front loading of costs on the claimant might deter some of the more frivolous or vexatious claims.
Set against the Gosling decision, it is worth remembering the ideology as outlined by Lord Justice Jackson in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&rCosts - Final Report of December 2009, para 2.11: «On the basis of the material provided during the Costs Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&rCosts Review, it seems to me inevitable that, provided the costs rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&rcosts rules are drafted so as (a) to deter frivolous or fraudulent claims and (b) to encourage acceptance of reasonable offers, the introduction of one way costs shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&rcosts shifting will materially reduce the costs of personal injuries litigation.&rcosts of personal injuries litigation.»
[55][56] In the case of Fox v. Vice, U.S. Supreme Court held that reasonable attorneys» fees could be awarded to the defendant under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1988, but only for costs that the defendant would not have incurred «but for the frivolous claims
Just as importantly, it also pays for your defense costs if someone brings a claim and says you injured them in a way that would be covered, even if the claim is frivolous.
Don't forget that if a claim is brought that would be covered by the policy, the policy also covers the cost of defending you against that claim — even if it's ridiculous, frivolous, or otherwise shouldn't have been brought in the first place.
The reason that car insurance companies add a deductible to their policies is because it helps them to reduce their costs and avoid frivolous claims.
Deductibles help you to manage your insurance costs; they also help to prevent frivolous claims and abuse of the system.
That's why Silver Spring Renters Insurance covers defense costs for a claim that would be covered by the policy, even if the suit is frivolous, ridiculous, bizarre, obtuse, or just plain nuts.
The frivolous claims still cost money to defend against, and your policy can provide defense coverage — even if the claim has no merit at all.
We know what lawyers cost, and you don't want to have to pay a defense attorney to defend you against a frivolous claim.
Payment of a large claim, and even defense against a frivolous one, is well worth the few dollars a month that renters insurance costs in Plainsboro.
It is a form of protection that you really shouldn't lean on for small or frivolous claims, because this sort of tendency can end up costing you on your rates for years to come.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z