Sentences with phrase «frivolous disputes»

However, credit reporting agencies are prone to catching on to the trick and can refuse to investigate what they believe to be frivolous disputes, leaving you back to square one.

The only exception is if they think you're making a frivolous dispute.

The reason why our already burdened legal system has this requirement is to avoid having to hear every frivolous dispute that may arise.

Not exact matches

By law, the credit bureaus are usually required to investigate the item in question within 30 days, unless they consider your dispute to be frivolous.

The law requires credit bureaus to investigate the items in question, usually within 30 days, unless your dispute is considered «frivolous».

The law requires credit bureaus to investigate the items in question, usually within 30 days, unless your dispute is considered «frivolous».

Not only are these disputes very likely to be rejected, but the credit bureaus do not even need to investigate disputes that are considered to be frivolous.

The FCRA allows consumer - reporting agencies to ignore any disputes it deems as frivolous or irrelevant.

If you identify information in your file that is incomplete or inaccurate, and report it to the consumer reporting agency, the agency must investigate unless your dispute is frivolous.

By law, the credit bureaus are usually required to investigate the item in question within 30 days, unless they consider your dispute to be frivolous.

It is required to only dispute 3 to 4 items at once because you don't want the credit bureau agencies to see the the disputes as «frivolous»: a term used in the Credit Repair world.

If doing it yourself, remember that the credit reporting agency has the right to refuse an investigation if they feel the dispute is frivolous, so you should be well informed before attempting.

If you send too many disputes at one time, the credit bureau can decide these disputes are frivolous and refuse to process the disputes.

Unless your dispute is frivolous or irrelevant, the credit bureau then must reinvestigate the matter.

Allow me to point out a section of the Fair Credit Reporting Act Section 611 (a)(3)(A) which states that a credit bureau may determine a requested reinvestigation dispute is frivolous and allow them to not conduct the investigation due to a lack of sufficient information to investigate the disputed information.

You must give solid reasons to accept your written dispute, otherwise the credit bureau may just dismiss your dispute as frivolous.

Furthermore, despite the fact that the internet is awash with reports of consumers getting rid of thousands in unpaid debts through credit repair, be cautious about filing frivolous credit report disputes.

Specifically, the credit bureaus do not have to investigate any credit report disputes they consider to be frivolous or irrelevant in nature.

They must reinvestigate the items in question, usually within 30 days, unless they consider your dispute frivolous.

CRAs must reinvestigate the items in question (usually within 30 days) unless they consider your dispute frivolous.

Do not let their «frivolous» statements discourage your efforts to dispute.

When disputes are submitted by consumers, the bureaus will send out a vague response that most commonly says something like, «We've already verified this item» or, «We find this dispute to be frivolous.»

The bureau will attack with their frivolous statements once again, but this time they will have reason to believe that your disputes are frivolous or designed to misdirect.

They believe that credit bureaus will see more than two disputes filed at once as «frivolous» and not take them seriously.

By law, credit bureaus have to investigate your dispute, unless it is frivolous.

When a consumer sends in a dispute letter, it is first sent through the E - Oscar automated re-investigation system to filter out any duplicate or «frivolous» requests.

Consumer reporting companies must investigate the items you question within 30 days — unless they consider your dispute frivolous.

Unfortunately, this also happens when they designate a dispute as «frivolous.»

The credit dispute letter can determine whether your dispute is taken seriously or thrown in the pile labeled frivolous.

We have reasonably determined that the dispute submitted on your behalf is frivolous or irrelevant.

These can include letters from the bureaus that say that the dispute is frivolous.

Trump, who does not actually have a Ph.D. in anything, is perhaps referring to his extensive experience with frivolous lawsuits, such as the trademark dispute over the phrase «You're fired» with Susan Brenner, the owner of You're Fired, a combination ceramics studio and arts and crafts store.

Fortunately, federal magistrates also read the rules quite literally and have a low tolerance for frivolous discovery disputes.

Although we advocate an aggressive litigation approach for our clients since strength deters frivolous claims and litigation tactics, we also know that our clients are well served by attempting to settle their disputes as soon as possible.

Should this application be dismissed without a hearing because it is frivolous, vexatious or was commenced in bad faith in accordance with Rule 68 of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code?

A letter dated March 6, 2014 was mailed to him at his last known address advising that under certain rules of the Dispute Resolution Practice Code (the Code) a hearing may be dismissed if the proceeding is deemed to be frivolous, vexatious or commenced in bad faith.

An interest in deterring frivolous lawsuits — and which cases qualify is often in the eye of the beholder — can not outweigh our imperative to have disputes resolved in a impartial tribunal when no other means is available.

Litigation (besides the frivolous kind) exists only for two reasons: disputed facts or, more rarely, disputed law.

Three of the most high profile proposals are: (1) the Saving High - tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes (SHILED) Act «forces patent trolls to financial responsibility for frivolous lawsuits»; (2) the Patent Quality Improvement Act expands the AIA by allowing more businesses to be covered under the transitional program for business method patents; and (3) the End Anonymous Patent Act, which requires the owner of patents to register with the UPSTO.

Michael Pattinson, head of the California Building Industry Association Dispute Resolution Task Force, called for tort reform, characterizing most of the lawsuits as frivolous.