Sentences with phrase «from atonement»

After the couple emerges from the atonement phase with tentative forgiveness, they come together to build a new relationship.

Abrams is wise enough to know that this story needed a great villain so he revisits Khan and casts a spectacular Benedict Cumberbatch (the sleazy dude from Atonement).

If they did, Amy Ryan's chances probably wouldn't be so overdetermined, because if there's anything more eternal than Oscar's penchant for snubbing a critic's darling, it is its tendency to give the cold shoulder to loathsome, almost irredeemable female roles (like Something Ronan's sniveling brat from Atonement, who is redeemed by film's end, but by two other actresses!).

Its beating heart is 21 - year - old Saoirse Ronan, once the bright - eyed teen from Atonement but now, on evidence here, the most quietly expressive actor of her generation.

It could've easily gone to Cate Blanchett, Ruby Dee, or Amy Ryan, Tilda Swinton just managed to come out on top.The girl from Atonement was the only nominee that really had no shot.

After several high - profile grown - up movies (from Atonement to Anna Karenina), director Joe Wright aims this Peter Pan origin story squarely at children.

Teen - assassin movie Hanna from Atonement's Joe Wright has the goods: a Chemical Brothers score, gorgeous locations (perfect for Wright's long shot), immense talent, fairy - tale undertones, and action.

It appears from most of the responses to your post that many will not be benefiting from the atonement of Jesus.

Not all will benefit from the atonement of Messiah.

But let's take a step back from the atonement for a moment.

Not exact matches

From a former Catholic: (Bred, Born and Brainwashed in the RCC for 65 years - altar boy, choir, sacraments, atonement theology, original sin, nun / priest / brother teachers et.

Hebrews outlines a version of the atonement that exists nowhere else in NT scripture — namely from Jesus» own teachings.

It is the whole atonement lesson, from cross through judgement.

I think Paul is hinting the Spirit of God will lead people into the ideas of God (from the whole Tanakh) and they don't need mind themselves with Jewish rituals (ie: circumcision — then I would also say — for that matter atonement — which is a Torah ritual).

We need to resist sickness and, by faith, submit ourselves to healing, which is from God through the atonement of Christ.

If you want to see how today's foundational truth is applied to our understanding of theology, Scripture, and culture, I highly recommend you get my book on the Atonement from Amazon.

Reading Christian books has not been one of my strong points (hang over from too much study), but in the case of the Atonement of God I couldn't put it down.

Biblical ideas of atonement root back in this basic soil and stem out from it; and while the development later carried them to branches far distant from the roots, there is no understanding the topmost twig — for example, «as in Adam all die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive» --(I Corinthians 15:22.)

If we think of Jesus» work apart from traditional atonement theory, what happens to the doctrine of Jesus» person?»

In other words, folks who grew up with the social gospel might need a dose of stubstitutionary atonement to save them from pride, while folks who grew up with the fire insurance gospel need a dose of the kingdom perspective to save them from self - focused individualism.

Among evangelicals, so much emphasis has been placed on the doctrine of substiutionary atonement that the focus has shifted away from FOLLOWING the life and teachings of Jesus (in order to be saved from sin) to simply BELIEVING in the death and resurrection of Jesus (in order to be saved from judgment).

I agree totally with you that our idea of substitutionary atonement has come from reading so much into God giving Adam and Eve coats of skin.

In light of this pattern, we can appreciate that the shed blood of Christ, the «Lamb of God,» made permanent atonement for mankind, and also made it possible for people to be ``... clothed with power from on high» (Luke 24:49).

I prefer to avoid the term «objective» in speaking of the Atonement, partly because of its obvious philosophical difficulties and partly because many theologians have assumed that the death of Christ can have objective efficacy only if it is an act directed either towards God, in satisfaction of his justice or in somehow making it possible for his love to operate for the forgiveness of sinners without compromising his holiness, or towards a personal devil in somehow liberating sinners from his clutches.

I was most nervous about this interview, mainly because discussions about predestination, salvation, limited atonement, and sovereignty tend to elicit strong emotional reactions from me.

The same kind of thing is true for a limited atonement, unconditional grace, total depravity, inability to forfeit salvation, etc. — in other words, in every place where classical Calvinism departs from God's Word.

Maddy, the transition from the old testament to the better New Covenant, reveals that Israel was absolutely supposed to share the laws, and atonement process with the world.

The drama of divine incarnation and atonement ought not to be — as it has easily been — abstracted from the teaching of Jesus, his proclamation of God's kingdom made into an incidental preamble to the «deep» and «real» mystery of faith.

Designed to test Warren's doctrine on everything from the sovereignty of God, to unconditional election, to substitutionary atonement, to homosexuality, the interview was seen by Piper as proof that Rick Warren was indeed a «doctrinally sound» evangelist.

A large area of historic Christian theology would have been completely altered if ideas of atonement, especially as related to the blood of Christ, had not been carried over from primitive concepts associated with animal sacrifice.

Cleveland draws from all sorts of sources — from Scot McKnight's A Community Called Atonement, to college football, to multiple scientific studies and surveys, many of which are quite colorful and fascinating.

The concepts of ransom, of vicarious suffering for the guilt of men, of propitiation and sacrifice all too easily turn into descriptions of how God is appeased through suffering, and thus the point that the atonement stems from his love is lost.

We may go beyond the traditional theories of atonement and ask a radical question: «What account would be given of atonement if we were to interpret it from the standpoint of the most realistic analogies we know to human love when it deals with broken relationships and the consequent suffering?»

We speak of «the doctrine of the atonement,» «the doctrine of Christ,» or «the doctrine of God,» and what we have in mind is the collective testimony from the various biblical authors as to what should be believed about the atonement, about Christ, and about God.

You must accept both Jesus» sacrifice as an atonement AND Jesus» sacrifice and resurrection as a work releasing your from sin and dead.

An «open letter» from Joel Edwards, general director of the Evangelical Alliance (UK) to those debating the theory of the atonement following the furore... More

We will look at this verse in more detail when we discuss the Calvinistic idea of Limited Atonement, but for now, it is enough to note that even if the whole world lies under the control of the wicked one, Jesus has done what is necessary to liberate the whole world from the evil one so that they can respond to the gospel and believe in Jesus for eternal life (cf. 1 John 5:7 - 13).

Nevertheless, such sin did not keep God from promising to remember His covenant with the people of Israel and provide atonement for them (Ezek 16:60 - 63).

Gerstenberger has subtly shifted the focus away from what the priests of Leviticus were talking about — namely effecting «kapparah» — and toward what is useful for Christian theological speculations, namely «atonement.»

From biblical accounts of atonement situations, however, we are able to uncover the connection between rite and disrupted reality.»

Christ's Atonement allows mankind to be saved from their sins and return to live with God and their families forever.

Chalke has strayed from safe evangelical territory over the years, upsetting conservatives by publicising his views on homosexuality, biblical interpretation, and the atonement.

For added thought, here is what Professor JD Crossan has to say about atonement theology: (from his book, «Who is Jesus» co-authored with Richard Watts)

And the Passover is the feast of sacrifice and atonement, when the high priest from the Holy of Holies sends the lamb carrying the sins of the people to its death.

There have been many other theories of atonement, each picking out what a given generation took to be the worst possible human situation and going on to affirm that in the action of God in Jesus, God met us precisely at that point: slavery to demonic powers, from which we have been delivered; actual slavery to human masters, with manumission accomplished in Christ; guilt for wrongdoing, with Christ as the advocate who pleads for, and secures, our release; corruptibility and mortal death, met in Christ with healing and eternal life....

Every profound theory of the atonement has its existential aspect, that is, its way of expressing the concrete human situation and what redeems us from futility.

For an added thought, here is what Professor JD Crossan has to say about atonement theology: (from his book, «Who is Jesus» co-authored with Richard Watts)

There are four affirmations about Jesus Christ that historically have been stressed in Christian faith: (1) Jesus is truly human, bone of our bone and flesh of our flesh, living a human life under the same human conditions any one of us faces — thus Christology, statement of the significance of Jesus, must start «from below,» as many contemporary theologians are insisting; (2) Jesus is that one in whom God energizes in a supreme degree, with a decisive intensity; in traditional language he has been styled «the Incarnate Word of God»; (3) for our sake, to secure human wholeness of life as it moves onward toward fulfillment, Jesus not only lived among us but also was crucified for us — this is the point of talk about atonement wrought in and by him; (4) death was not the end for him, so it is not as if he never existed at all; in some way he triumphed over death, or was given victory over it, so that now and forever he is a reality in the life of God and effective among humankind.

In my case I have undergone a life changing shift in my view of what Christ achieved for us (thanks to you) and so I agree with what you have proposed as a more accurate view of the atonement coming from scripture.

The same theme is developed from a different theoretic position in Bernard Steinzor, The Healing Partnership (New York: Harper & Row, 1967); cf. Don S. Browning Atonement and Psychotherapy (Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1966).