Many educators fear losing support
from affluent parents, who have the option to quit the public schools altogether and enroll their children in private schools — or flee to suburban schools.
Not exact matches
Ms. Agrell suggests that stamps in children's passports are merely status symbols for the aforementioned «
affluent, affected
parents», and even quotes the godfather of travel guidebooks, Arthur Frommer, as questioning how children or
parents benefit
from family travel.
For Levine's latest book is, in fact, a cri de coeur
from a clinician on the front lines of the battle between our better natures —
parents» deep and true love and concern for their kids — and our culture's worst competitive and materialistic influences, all of which she sees played out, day after day, in her private psychology practice in
affluent Marin County, Calif..
Next we heard
from Mark Terry, who gave a compelling comparison of his old school district — a low SES urban district with a high ELL population, an 85 % free / reduced qualifying rate, and a high need for meal and nutrition education services — and his current district, which is more
affluent with a much lower free / reduced qualification rate and a community of
parents who have high expectations for student success and a healthy lifestyle.
But one of the complaints I most often hear
from parents at more
affluent schools is that their kids are «double - dipping» at breakfast, eating a full meal at home and then eating some or all of the school meal as well.
How are
affluent parents preventing their children
from developing grit?
Adoption exists for several reasons: to keep down the number of welfare recipients (i.e. single
parents on welfare), for the North American adoption industry to profit (to the tune of $ 1.4 billion in 1999 alone)
from the spending - power of the
affluent, and (formerly) as a way of punishing young unwed mothers for their «loose and immoral» behaviour.
According to the research, only child in the family develops close relationships with
parents, builds self - esteem, attains high grasping power, becomes orally advanced, more
affluent in education, and receives more support and encouragement
from parents.
The surprise is that Clinton, which routinely smacks down
affluent schools in these competitions, is not full of college - bound kids
from fancy neighborhoods; it is full of everyday kids whose
parents work in blue - collar jobs.
Everything
from teen romance to hateful
parents was touched on as the show tried to guide viewers through a traditional,
affluent teenage experience.
The core of that mush is Thomas (Callum Turner), a kid who just graduated
from college and is trying to make his own way in the big apple — without the help of his
affluent parents.
The push for bilingualism often comes
from English - speaking
parents who live in
affluent suburban communities and want their children to learn a second language, according to Education Trust - West.
Austin is a hard - driving politico
from the
affluent west side of L.A., and now the unlikely head of
Parent Revolution, a mostly Latina advocacy group led by the Los Angeles
Parents Union and bankrolled by Broad and charter proponents.
District 4
parents have even gone so far as to accuse the school of deliberately keeping local families away in favor of more
affluent ones
from other districts via a manipulated waitlist.
But even at Piney Branch, which benefits
from the vast resources of a huge,
affluent school system in Montgomery County, Maryland, it sure seems rickety, held with lots of duct tape and chewing gum, and subject to collapse without just the right staff and
parent support.
The findings
from the Education Next — PEPG survey reported in this essay are based on a nationally representative stratified sample of approximately 550 adults (age 18 years and older) and representative oversamples of roughly 350 members of the following subgroups: the
affluent (as defined below), public school teachers,
parents of school - aged children, residents of zip codes in which a charter school was located during the 2009 — 10 school year, African Americans, and Hispanics.
From my own personal experience (Fordham is working on collecting more rigorous, non-anecdotal data — stay tuned for that),
affluent parents break down into at least three groups:
This is particularly important for low - income students, who tend to learn most content in school and, unlike
affluent children of college - educated
parents, generally do not get to benefit
from trips to museums, story times at the library, and other opportunities.
As proven by Stanford's Sean Reardon, the widening of the achievement gap results
from additional opportunities
affluent parents provide their children out of the K - 12 environment: high - quality pre-K, tutoring, and after - school and summer enrichment.
In 2014,
parents of students at Horace Mann Elementary School in Northwest Washington, D.C., spent over $ 470,000 of their own money to support the school's programs.1 With just under 290 students enrolled for the 2013 - 14 school year, this means that, in addition to public funding, Horace Mann spent about an extra $ 1,600 for each student.2 Those dollars — equivalent to 9 percent of the District of Columbia's average per - pupil spending3 — paid for new art and music teachers and classroom aides to allow for small group instruction.4 During the same school year, the
parent - teacher association, or PTA, raised another $ 100,000 in
parent donations and collected over $ 200,000 in membership dues, which it used for similar initiatives in future years.5 Not surprisingly, Horace Mann is one of the most
affluent schools in the city, with only 6 percent of students coming
from low - income families.6
In both districts, schools serving the most
affluent students received tens of thousands of dollars in additional funding each year
from parents, while the highest - poverty schools received very little, if anything,
from their PTAs.
An evaluation study of the district's equity fund highlighted several implementation challenges.65 Some PTAs simply did not comply with the district's policy to give back some dollars, and the district had difficulty figuring out how to exempt some PTA expenses fairly
from redistribution.66 The evaluators did not examine how this policy affected PTA revenues, but there was significant pushback
from members of the community, with some
parents threatening to reduce donations during initial policy negotiations.67 A group of
parents voiced that the approach was punitive, and that instead,
parents should be encouraged to donate to a separate equity fund or to other, less
affluent schools.68 Other districts that have considered establishing an equity fund have feared similar pushback, worrying that rich
parents will threaten to leave the district, disinvest in their schools, or decrease their overall contributions.69
School leaders in
affluent areas are able to call on support
from wealthier
parents to provide funding for better facilities, unlike leaders in less advantaged schools, where «
parents aren't in a position to help financially».
You might recall
from a post I released approximately 1.5 years ago a story about how a person who self - identifies as «Virginia SGP,» who is also now known as Brian Davison — a
parent of two public school students in the
affluent Loudoun, Virginia area (hereafter referred to as Virginia SGP), sued the state of Virginia in an attempt to force the release of teachers» student growth percentile (SGP) data for all teachers across the state.
Students who are not fluent in English and whose
parents are not college educated and have low incomes generally fare worse on standardized tests than students who come
from more
affluent backgrounds and whose
parents are highly educated.
Poor children are not given the same high - quality education that children
from affluent neighborhoods are given, and certainly not ever without a struggle
from parents.
If the power of solidarity is going to reclaim our schools, more
affluent, predominantly white activists will need to develop an anti-racist understanding of the movement against standardized testing and the barriers that communities of color face to joining — including the very real fear
from parents of color that their children's schools will be shut down if they don't encourage them to score well on the tests.
This is particularly important for low - income students, who tend to learn most content in school and, unlike
affluent children of college - educated
parents, generally do not benefit
from trips to museums, story times at the library, and other opportunities.
But this reminded me of something I read recently, a complaint that «
affluent parents have become role models for luxury and licentiousness, and have moved far away
from caring about whether their children develop habits of discipline and self - restraint.
Parenting support programs have been shown to have positive effects among families with young infants at high psychosocial risk.20 - 25 Our results suggest a benefit from the universal provision of parenting and child development support services to an unselected sample of families with health coverage, who ranged from the affluent and employed to those at greater socioeconomic and psychosoc
Parenting support programs have been shown to have positive effects among families with young infants at high psychosocial risk.20 - 25 Our results suggest a benefit
from the universal provision of
parenting and child development support services to an unselected sample of families with health coverage, who ranged from the affluent and employed to those at greater socioeconomic and psychosoc
parenting and child development support services to an unselected sample of families with health coverage, who ranged
from the
affluent and employed to those at greater socioeconomic and psychosocial risk.
Parents in the slums of Africa face a daily struggle to survive but a Triple P study suggests their dreams for their children appear the same as those of parents from more affluent cou
Parents in the slums of Africa face a daily struggle to survive but a Triple P study suggests their dreams for their children appear the same as those of
parents from more affluent cou
parents from more
affluent countries.
Specific group differences noted
from Tukey pairwise comparisons revealed that younger adolescents (12 — 14 years), and those
from more
affluent families (≥ $ 60,000), reported more favorable views of
parents» monitoring when compared to a «good
parent».