Results
from annual standardized tests can be useful for accountability purposes, but student progress must be measured on a far more frequent basis if the data are being used to inform instruction and improve achievement.
Not exact matches
Adding to a system that includes ELA and Math
tests from 3rd to 8th grade, the New York State Report Card and AYP ratings (Adequate Yearly Progress), New York State is incorporating the new
Annual Professional Performance Review or «APPR» which measures teacher performance based, in part, on
standardized state
tests.
Judging pediatricians on the changes in the height and weight of their young patients as measured at their
annual physicals
from one year to the next makes just as much sense as using student «growth» on
annual standardized reading and math
tests to evaluate teachers.
In August, Oklahoma became the second state to lose a waiver
from the 2001 law, which mandated
standardized testing and set
annual growth goals called Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP).
Not too long ago, California released its statewide 2012
annual school rankings, listing the top - performing schools in the state, based on the Academic Performance Index (API), which is calculated
from standardized test results.
Last month, the results
from the second part of the 46th
annual PDK / Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes Toward the Public Schools demonstrated that the public is growing more skeptical of using student
standardized test scores to evaluate teachers.
While the Common Core State Standards might survive in some form without
annual standardized testing, the
testing consortia, Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) and Smarter Balance Assessment Consortium (SBAC), began their work with the support of federal grants almost as soon as the standards were being adopted thanks to financial support
from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and federal incentives
from the Race to the Top grant program.