Sentences with phrase «from arguments about»

Title insurance: insurance that protects the lender against any claims that arise from arguments about ownership of the property; also available for homebuyers.

I wouldn't say she is even - handed in her criticism of the opposing sides, and I think she is taking precisely the wrong lesson from her arguments about uncertainty, but she doesn't seem more denier - ish lately to me.

We were rather weak on facts and figures, on causes and consequences, and shied away from arguments about practicalities.

Quite apart from arguments about «responsible solutions» (let's not do that again), an isotope that's radioactive has potential energy — that's what makes it radioactive, after all — so that in principle transmuting it to a more stable isotope * should release energy, which could be harnessed.

Indeed, even many Republican politicians now shy away from arguments about the importance of marriage for fear of veering into the debate over same - sex marriage.

Those judgments tend to arise from arguments about invertebrates» failure to demonstrate the behaviors we usually associate with a pain response.

Resident Mark Patrick said the time has come to step back from arguments about the wisdom of building the Sanctuary Course.

It would also, appropriately, decouple arguments about legitimate and illegitimate types of relationships from arguments about what is best for children.

In the first place it is inconceivable that a resolution will come from arguments about who is right or wrong, because in such arguments there is already an implicit acknowledgement by both parties that secular reason is the arbiter.

it stemmed from an argument about what to stuff the turkey with... mom wanted bread - like dressing with celery but it gave me heartburn... so she made that dressing separate and we stuffed the turkey with granny smith apples, raisins, dried apricots and cranberries, walnuts, some nutmeg, cinnamon, and a single clove leaf.

Not exact matches

«Arguments about net neutrality shouldn't be used to prevent the most disadvantaged people in society from gaining access or to deprive people of opportunity.

Testing hypotheses and trading arguments about theories often works better than planting a flag and asking team members to try to topple you from opinion mountain.

The solution then is inflation, in our arguments over the last week Nick and I disagreed about the various transmission mechanisms from monetary policy to the real economy (we also argued over the basic causes of the trap, the last sentance was my version).

Every email your sales team sends, every voicemail they leave, and every demo they give in person or over the phone reinforces or detracts from this commercial argument you make to your prospect about why your solution is so fantastic for her business.

Critics from the right tend to be concerned about the content of their message, noting that successful CEO activism often advances left - leaning arguments on issues like gun control and diversity.

In short, the arguments about the difficulties of influencing activity should make central bankers cautious and modest about their role as cyclical stabilisers, but do not excuse them from taking the cycle into account in setting policy, and doing what they can to lop peaks and fill troughs.

Unfortunately, we drifted away from the actual question, dreamed about a logical fallacy and refuted an argument that was never made.

But it appears to be relying in part on an argument from ignorance, since one of its arguments is that not enough is known yet about how diluted bitumen might behave when spilled in the marine environment.

The argument is that the warrant, submitted to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, relied on dubious information from the Trump - Russia dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele — and that the judge was not informed about the actual source of the information.

Much of your argument such as I've seen, for your sky fairy (and I really think that is an appropriate term for your obviously fictional deity with all the self - contradictory tales about it in the bible), really seems to consist of a combination of willed ignorance and arguments from ignorance.

Economists are rightly skeptical of moral arguments about market abuse, as such arguments are usually followed by legislation that protects companies of the old, stodgy type from young upstarts or that just feathers a nonmarket or quasi-market nest.

Perhaps P is true for another reason other than G. Additionally, you claims about life have purpose is fallacious, i.e. argument from incredulity or common sense.

He's still upset because he lost that argument about god / no god from a couple pages ago.

You have taken a story about a community pulling together, drawing strength and inspiration from one another regardless of race and drawn it into a petty argument.

I've heard lots of arguments about why everything Matt Walsh publishes should be deleted, recycled, and then the hard drives they were deleted from melted down into slag and thrown into an active volcano to ensure that none of his radical ultra-conservative garbage is ever recovered, but all of them seem to center around the idea that because he is condescending, he is wrong.

... psst arguments about god are discredited from the get go until gods can be properly defined and demonstrated to exist.

That's not an argument for God, but it does tell a very different story about Him from the one told by Fry.

The Catholic Church, to take one prominent institution devoted to the defense of human life from conception until natural death, makes no «theological» argument about the nature of the life in the womb.

And this exchange, totally imaginable — perhaps some version of it has occurred in these very United States, between people who couldn't tell John Roberts from the Dread Pirate Roberts — must, when it occurs between two private parties, quickly devolve into an argument about whose need trumps whose: the couple's need for the florist's services, or the florist's need to obey his conscience.

William Chip and Michael Scaperlanda renew their argument about the churches and immigration, while Gary Anderson undertakes a critical examination of the important recent book from Kevin J. Madigan and Jon D. Levenson, Resurrection: The Power of God for Christians and Jews.

The argument between Ford and traditional interpreters, then, is about how to move forward from the very last phase of Whitehead's formulations in Process and Reality, not about what Whitehead intended to say.

I read two articles last year (which I didn't document, like you, thinking it was out of the question) about pedophiles making the exact same argument as the present day argument that homosexuals have taken from the cause of the Black people; «they were born that way.»

I haven't heard that argument used for movies since the early days of pornography when hard - core pictures were preceded by a warning from a man wearing a doctor's smock about the terrible things viewers were about to witness.

Employing biblical, theological, and philosophical arguments, John Paul described the Christian conception of man, and spoke about the inviolability of human life, from conception to death.

I refer to my earlier comment about an argument from authority being fallacious.

The same argument could be made about the entire bible — being that it's an assembly of writings from unverifiable authors... just say «n.

You haven't responded to what I have talked about with argument from authority, so I'm not going to consider your recommendations.

Bernardo, I just think you are continuing to be silly in professing to have wisdom to impart and continuing down this path of rhetoric about a «myth» and logical fallacy of argument from authority.

Absent from either argument is any question about whether the bishops ought to have an explicit political agenda at all.

I only say that to say that if you are allowed your argument what prevents others from using the same argument about actions they don't want classified as sin.

We can connect Whitrow's argument with Craig's intuitions about counting to infinity, but this time, we will run the sequence from the past to the present (indeed, the past is symmetrical).

Thus examination of the argument from parsimony serves finally to suggest not merely that Whiteheadian panpsychism remains unwarranted, but also that it is actually incompatible with what it seems responsible to take to be facts about a physical world, and should therefore be deemed false.

So if what Jesus said to Philip can't be used to teach us about the nature and character of God because it's historical narrative, then this same argument applies to every text in the Bible, and you can also not use anything from the Law, the Writings, the Prophets, the Gospels, or the Epistles.

the writers gained NO money and power from writing it... sorry... your argument is weak and baseless... and the 4 Gospels were written from about 15 to 30 years after Jesus... pretty ignorant to think it was 40 to 80..

It lies at the heart of revisionist arguments about sex, and these can not be assessed apart from an analysis of the significance and adequacy of «the self» as a moral notion.

A developed argument about American exceptionalism and the nature of the American Founding would take us a long way toward understanding why we don't want religion to be pushed from the shared mainstream over to one side's shore.

Their argument seems to imply they don't share that empathy... they are ultimately worried about being punished, in the end I don't truly believe they don't share the same empathy, but it is funny that is a logical conclusion to make from their position.

To those who think attributing scientific results to God is a poor argument, just think about the big bang... it probably happened but where did the atoms come from to create the big bang?

Realizing that he is about to transgress something holy, Klosterman backs away from the implications of his argument.

Speculation about what nature is in itself, backed up by rational arguments, particularly about the mind - body problem, and empirical evidence from the sciences, is therefore a necessary dimension of a process Christian theology.